Notices
DIY Turbo Discussion greddy on a 1.8? homebrew kit?

GT2860RS direct bolt-in replacement for GT2560 ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 2, 2010 | 06:39 PM
  #1  
JasonC SBB's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,420
Total Cats: 84
Default GT2860RS direct bolt-in replacement for GT2560 ?

Is it?

TIA
Old Aug 2, 2010 | 07:01 PM
  #2  
bbundy's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,502
Total Cats: 146
From: Anacortes, WA
Default

Originally Posted by JasonC SBB
Is it?

TIA
I think there are a couple different versions for both of those turbos. Might be a difference in the inlet to the compressor but should be relatively easy work around with a different diameter inlet pipe to the air filter. Exhaust side fits up the same.

Bob
Old Aug 2, 2010 | 10:18 PM
  #3  
y8s's Avatar
y8s
DEI liberal femininity
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 19,338
Total Cats: 574
From: Fake Virginia
Default

You may also want to check the exhaust flanges. I know there are two five bolt patterns, but i'm not sure what they go to.
Old Aug 2, 2010 | 10:32 PM
  #4  
shlammed's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,910
Total Cats: 51
From: Kingston, Ontario
Default

there is the typical 5 bolt and iirc the skyline bolt pattern.

they should be nearly the same with the difference of the 3" compressor inlet if you get a REAL 2860rs.

having had the 2860RS and a 2871 i would suggest going straight to the 2871. (if your open to suggestions, and if your going new)
Old Aug 4, 2010 | 12:30 PM
  #5  
JasonC SBB's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,420
Total Cats: 84
Default

What's a REAL vs "fake" GT2860rs?

What differences did you see between the '60 and the '71?
Old Aug 4, 2010 | 03:00 PM
  #6  
clay's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 373
Total Cats: 0
From: San Diego, Ca
Default

Call Corky or FM and ask as they use both turbos on their kits. At the most it may require clocking or modifying the intake pipe.
Old Aug 4, 2010 | 05:00 PM
  #7  
shlammed's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,910
Total Cats: 51
From: Kingston, Ontario
Default

real being the 3" inlet RS with a 0.86 hotside... the other one is dubbed a 28rs but with alternate housings and such.
Old Aug 4, 2010 | 05:03 PM
  #8  
shlammed's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,910
Total Cats: 51
From: Kingston, Ontario
Default

i have yet to get the 2871 dyno tuned, but it makes more power everywhere at the same boost level.

cars that i couldnt keep up to before i can now and from visual 4th gear pulls i make peak boost at identical rpm's on the same manifold

(however i did change from t2 flanged to the newer TiAL housing which means i had to hack off the t2 flange to weld the vband flange onto the tubular manifold)
Old Aug 4, 2010 | 07:46 PM
  #9  
JasonC SBB's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,420
Total Cats: 84
Default

Originally Posted by shlammed
i have yet to get the 2871 dyno tuned, but it makes more power everywhere at the same boost level.
What were your '60 and '71 a/r's? And, how much low end (3000`3500 RPM) and spoolup did you lose?
Old Aug 5, 2010 | 12:20 AM
  #10  
shlammed's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,910
Total Cats: 51
From: Kingston, Ontario
Default

0.86 AR hotside with iirc 62 trim 28rs wheels and 56 trim 71r wheels?

low end i dont think that i really lost any power... if i have it might have been 200-300rpm.

i know that i needed to retune my cells in boost at 3200-3700 the most which means that the turbo flows more in those cells and then there was ~4% more flow at the same map pressures for the remainder of the power cells. aka 3700-7100
Old Aug 6, 2010 | 03:32 PM
  #11  
JasonC SBB's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,420
Total Cats: 84
Default

So there's the rub - I'm looking at the 0.64 a/r GT2860RS as it is primarily a street car. Should be way spoolier than the 0.86 a/r, or any of the 2871's.
Old Aug 6, 2010 | 04:10 PM
  #12  
shlammed's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,910
Total Cats: 51
From: Kingston, Ontario
Default

go with that then.
if you have a nice manifold, some time and the funds, the TIAL hotside is (IMO) the reason my spool remained similar between the 2860 and the 2871 as thats literally the only difference between the setups.

the 2860 should flow enough even in the top end with a 0.64 that you shouldnt be noticing a power drop in the higher RPM since you have the AEM EMS and the nice boost control that it offers.

-Matt
Old Sep 4, 2010 | 07:09 PM
  #13  
falcon's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,499
Total Cats: 16
Default

what do you think a 2860rs with a .64 housing is good for on a 1.6? Say at 15-16PSI?
Old Sep 5, 2010 | 04:24 PM
  #14  
shlammed's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,910
Total Cats: 51
From: Kingston, Ontario
Default

would probably be ok.

bigger is better.
Old Sep 5, 2010 | 04:33 PM
  #15  
falcon's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,499
Total Cats: 16
Default

My block is built. Plus headwork and cams in the near future. Goal is 300whp. It's either a 2860rs or a Rotrex. I am teetering back and forth between the two.
Old Sep 5, 2010 | 10:39 PM
  #16  
shlammed's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,910
Total Cats: 51
From: Kingston, Ontario
Default

if you have a built engine get the 2871.

2860 0.64 will probably make 280whp but will die in higher rpms
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
emilio700
Wheels and Tires
151
Jun 2, 2017 02:36 PM
Frank_and_Beans
Supercharger Discussion
13
Sep 12, 2016 08:17 PM
lsc224
Miata parts for sale/trade
2
Oct 1, 2015 09:17 AM
mx592
Suspension, Brakes, Drivetrain
1
Oct 1, 2015 12:45 AM
shooterschmidty
Engine Performance
8
Sep 30, 2015 10:28 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:24 PM.