Notices
DIY Turbo Discussion greddy on a 1.8? homebrew kit?

GT3071 on stock 1.6

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 23, 2010 | 02:45 PM
  #21  
DLN84's Avatar
Newb
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 27
Total Cats: 0
Default

This thing will be extremely laggy. I ran a fully built Audi A4 1.9L 9.5:1 compression with meth injection and full 3 inch exhaust all the way through. Got full 24 psi at 4800 RPM.
Old Sep 23, 2010 | 03:18 PM
  #22  
Reverant's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 6,020
Total Cats: 369
From: Athens, Greece
Default

I've tuned one, 1.6L built engine (Wisecos and Eagle rods) on a '97 chassis.

7psi at 5100rpm, I kid you not.

Honestly, sell it and get a 2560.
Old Sep 23, 2010 | 04:02 PM
  #23  
shlammed's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,910
Total Cats: 51
From: Kingston, Ontario
Default

just change your redline to 9,000rpm and you will be fine.

OPG's ATI dampner and the mazdacomp lifter kit with intake manifold and cam gears.
Old Sep 25, 2010 | 11:36 PM
  #24  
jtothawhat's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,376
Total Cats: 4
From: Chicagoland
Default

I've had a bigger turbo on my 1.6L depends on your horsepower goals, I don't understand why people are so scared to go big on a Miata.
Old Sep 26, 2010 | 12:17 AM
  #25  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

Me either.
Old Sep 26, 2010 | 03:41 AM
  #26  
Bond's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 3,219
Total Cats: 14
From: Southlake,Texas
Default

Originally Posted by jtothawhat
I've had a bigger turbo on my 1.6L depends on your horsepower goals, I don't understand why people are so scared to go big on a Miata.
Because **** breaks at 250whp and that power level can be achieved by more responsive turbo. Assuming stock motor of course.
Old Sep 26, 2010 | 04:05 AM
  #27  
Reverant's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 6,020
Total Cats: 369
From: Athens, Greece
Default

I'm sure a GT42 turbo fits under the hood, why not try that?

What fun is a miata that doesn't have boost until 5000rpm? The 2871 is probably the biggest turbo I would go with on a 1.8. I've tried all sorts of different combinations on many cars I've tuned and driven, from a smaller-than-T25 on a 93, a 2560 on a '00 1.6, a 2860 on 1.8 '00, a 2871 on 2002 1.8 to a 3071 on a '97 1.6.

I didn't like the 3071 on the 1.6 at all. I loved the 2560 on the 1.6, very easy to drive around at 12psi, hugely fun. The 2002 on the 2871 was a beast (420rwhp at 23psi) but you could still have fun because it made 14psi at 4000rpm, and 7-8psi at 3300rpm.
Old Sep 26, 2010 | 05:10 AM
  #28  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default



3076 on my 00 1.8

It is a TON of fun and great around town.
~5psi down low generates enough grunt to be able to get out of your own way, then after 4 all hell breaks loose.
People often forget that with a large turbo flowing large ammounts of air you can massage the ignition down low even at low boost and make up for quite a bit of the "lag"


In a perfect world I'd have a 2L 35R weekend toy and 2560 low boost quiet/soft "daily"
Old Sep 26, 2010 | 11:04 AM
  #29  
Reverant's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 6,020
Total Cats: 369
From: Athens, Greece
Default

On the 1.6:

Old Sep 26, 2010 | 02:52 PM
  #30  
xCOLEx's Avatar
Newb
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 10
Total Cats: 0
From: Hawaii
Default

Originally Posted by 18psi
3076 on my 00 1.8

It is a TON of fun and great around town.
~5psi down low generates enough grunt to be able to get out of your own way, then after 4 all hell breaks loose.
People often forget that with a large turbo flowing large ammounts of air you can massage the ignition down low even at low boost and make up for quite a bit of the "lag"


In a perfect world I'd have a 2L 35R weekend toy and 2560 low boost quiet/soft "daily"
What do you mean by "massage the ignition down low"? Retard the timing? Im very curious because i plan on getting a T3/T4 50 a/r 57 trim for my stock 1.6. Im afraid this would be to laggy also.
Old Sep 26, 2010 | 04:35 PM
  #31  
shlammed's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,910
Total Cats: 51
From: Kingston, Ontario
Default

advance it in the low low reigons with no boost to try to keep it quick and retard it right before the turbo spools to help it spool up faster has worked for me.
Old Sep 26, 2010 | 05:10 PM
  #32  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

Pretty much.

And the graph reverant posted is identical to mine in shape but about 1300rpm to the right.

Might be a LITTLE too laggy for a 1.6, now that I see when it hits peak boost
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Full_Tilt_Boogie
Build Threads
84
Apr 12, 2021 04:21 PM
Rick02R
WTB
3
Jan 3, 2016 07:18 PM
tazswing
Race Prep
20
Oct 3, 2015 11:04 AM
Trent
WTB
2
Oct 1, 2015 12:15 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:14 AM.