Notices
DIY Turbo Discussion greddy on a 1.8? homebrew kit?

how much does a cat hurt?

Old Sep 27, 2007 | 10:22 AM
  #1  
m2cupcar's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,486
Total Cats: 372
From: Atlanta
Default how much does a cat hurt?

Any examples of with and without power runs? Just wondering. At some point I'm going to flange the back side of my cat so I can swap it out and get an actual number, along with checking a muffler vs. a straight pipe.
Old Sep 27, 2007 | 10:24 AM
  #2  
magnamx-5's Avatar
:(
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 8,255
Total Cats: 4
From: nowhere
Default

hmm at a 15 psi car with decent size turbo probably 30 whp given you adjust the fuel and timming. given 8 psi maybe 15 whp. Seems like a fun thing to try though.
Old Sep 27, 2007 | 10:25 AM
  #3  
Splitime's Avatar
Miotta FTW!
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,290
Total Cats: 31
From: Chicagoland, IL
Default

It all depends, has it been de-clawed?
Old Sep 27, 2007 | 10:44 AM
  #4  
y8s's Avatar
y8s
DEI liberal femininity
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 19,338
Total Cats: 574
From: Fake Virginia
Default

hey rob, I plan to pull my cat at some point so i can flange (v-band) a new one in. I can probably whip up a test pipe and see what difference it makes if you want.

want = buy me another pair of v-band flanges so I dont have to shell out for them.
Old Sep 27, 2007 | 10:44 AM
  #5  
Zabac's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (39)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 4,850
Total Cats: 8
From: High Point NC
Default

Originally Posted by Splitime
It all depends, has it been de-clawed?
nice....:gay:

but good question, i have no clue, magna's numbers sound a bit too high for me, it would be awesome if someone made an actual comparo...i think a lot of people would benefit from that knowledge...i myself am going cat less without even knowing what my power gains will be
Old Sep 27, 2007 | 10:46 AM
  #6  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

the next time i dyno will be with no cat.

the next time after that will most liekly be with a cat. if you can wait 6 months ill let you know.
Old Sep 27, 2007 | 10:54 AM
  #7  
Ben's Avatar
Ben
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,659
Total Cats: 134
From: atlanta-ish
Default

Not terribly direct, but my test pipe power run made 255 whp. My with cat power run made 233 whp. BUT I also changed intercoolers AND only made 11 psi to redline. With the test pipe it held 13 psi to redline. And the two runs were months apart. They were on the same dyno, but with different operators.

There is also a small loss of spool/response at positive pressure transition with the cat. I liked the test pipe response, but also like how the cat makes the exhaust not stink.
__________________
Chief of Floor Sweeping, DIYAutoTune.com & AMP EFI
Crew Chief, Car Owner & Least Valuable Driver, HongNorrthRacing

91 Turbo | 10AE Turbo | 01 Track Rat | #323 Mazda Champcar

Originally Posted by concealer404
Buy an MSPNP Pro, you'll feel better.
Old Sep 27, 2007 | 11:03 AM
  #8  
Zabac's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (39)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 4,850
Total Cats: 8
From: High Point NC
Default

still a big gain over small changes, but IMO the response is just as important
Old Sep 27, 2007 | 11:04 AM
  #9  
jwarriner's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 564
Total Cats: 1
From: Denver, CO
Default

Originally Posted by m2cupcar
Any examples of with and without power runs? Just wondering. At some point I'm going to flange the back side of my cat so I can swap it out and get an actual number, along with checking a muffler vs. a straight pipe.
This isn't a direct data point for Miatas but it is interesting. When I gutted the cat on my Talon I went from being able to make 0psi at the line to 10psi at the line.
Old Sep 27, 2007 | 11:14 AM
  #10  
RotorNutFD3S's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,522
Total Cats: 36
From: Newnan, GA
Default

I don't have any power charts to compare, but I will say that when I had the cat on, I'd only be hitting 57 mph at the top of second gear. In the same run with my test pipe on, I now hit 63 mph.
Old Sep 27, 2007 | 11:17 AM
  #11  
magnamx-5's Avatar
:(
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 8,255
Total Cats: 4
From: nowhere
Default

Originally Posted by RotorNutFD3S
I don't have any power charts to compare, but I will say that when I had the cat on, I'd only be hitting 57 mph at the top of second gear. In the same run with my test pipe on, I now hit 63 mph.
Uh RTN top o 2nd is gear limited not hp per the same rpm you will always hit the same speed. unless the tire goes flat etc. now if you are talking about over a certian distance then that is relavent to the hp in question
Old Sep 27, 2007 | 11:22 AM
  #12  
Ben's Avatar
Ben
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,659
Total Cats: 134
From: atlanta-ish
Default

Originally Posted by RotorNutFD3S
I don't have any power charts to compare, but I will say that when I had the cat on, I'd only be hitting 57 mph at the top of second gear. In the same run with my test pipe on, I now hit 63 mph.
So the cat came with a new rear diff ratio too?
__________________
Chief of Floor Sweeping, DIYAutoTune.com & AMP EFI
Crew Chief, Car Owner & Least Valuable Driver, HongNorrthRacing

91 Turbo | 10AE Turbo | 01 Track Rat | #323 Mazda Champcar

Originally Posted by concealer404
Buy an MSPNP Pro, you'll feel better.
Old Sep 27, 2007 | 11:36 AM
  #13  
Loki047's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 4,143
Total Cats: -5
From: Chicago
Default

didnt yours?
Old Sep 27, 2007 | 11:40 AM
  #14  
cjernigan's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 8,091
Total Cats: 7
From: Atlanta, GA
Default

I know mine did, torsen too. (picked it up yesterday)
Old Sep 27, 2007 | 11:42 AM
  #15  
RotorNutFD3S's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,522
Total Cats: 36
From: Newnan, GA
Default

IDK... That was what I noticed before I installed the test pipe. I purposefully did a test run before and after I swapped everything out. I made sure I shifted at the same point, and that's what I came out with. I'm not trying to argue with what y'all are saying, but that's what I got. However, I didn't even think about it from a gear mindset and seeing how it wouldn't make sense. If I had, I would have tried things over again to see if I did something different. I'm not too savvy yet on gearing, so it doesn't click in my mind real fast.

Last edited by RotorNutFD3S; Sep 27, 2007 at 11:55 AM.
Old Sep 27, 2007 | 11:55 AM
  #16  
m2cupcar's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,486
Total Cats: 372
From: Atlanta
Default

all you had to do was say you hit a higher mph before you had to hit the brakes to avoid driving off the edge of the cliff Of course better brakes would've achieved the same.

I just brought it up because if the difference is big, then it could be an "apples to apples" issue when comparing dyno runs across turbo setups. I'm set on testing it and the muff because I really want to see just how much of a choke these things put on the turbo.

Way back I swapped to what I thought would be a more restrictive cheapie turbo style muffler and got datalogs that showed a 200rpm+ quicker spool across the board over the "flowmaster" that was on the car. Looking at a cutaway of both muffs you wouldn't think the turbo muff would flow better, but me thinks those flat panels do bad thinks to exhaust flow on a turbo setup (as someone mentioned in that thread.)
Old Sep 27, 2007 | 12:08 PM
  #17  
Loki047's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 4,143
Total Cats: -5
From: Chicago
Default

well you gotta remember, if you reach a choked condition before the cat, removing the cat and all that **** wont increase flow or power. I dont think thats the case so do it.
Old Sep 27, 2007 | 01:03 PM
  #18  
m2cupcar's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,486
Total Cats: 372
From: Atlanta
Default

I'm sure there's some choking due to my crap OE internal gate dumping through the 2.5" internal gate exit. After that it's 3" all the way. The external gate will come after the next dyno round. I think the more setups we get, the more interesting it will be to see how things differ.
Old Sep 27, 2007 | 01:10 PM
  #19  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

acutally i forgot. ive done this before.

ive dynoed twice at the same boost level before.

first time ever, making 173rwp. second time with the begi manifold and dp and no cat making 171rwhp. the plots are almost identical with a bit less torque with the begi setup as i was too rich.

i suspect i need an exhaust that actually flows good and then try again. oh, interesting i just ordered a 3" exhaust and test pipe :gay:
Attached Thumbnails how much does a cat hurt?-first_begi_dyno.jpg  
Old Sep 27, 2007 | 02:27 PM
  #20  
Loki047's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 4,143
Total Cats: -5
From: Chicago
Default

Originally Posted by m2cupcar
I'm sure there's some choking due to my crap OE internal gate dumping through the 2.5" internal gate exit. After that it's 3" all the way. The external gate will come after the next dyno round. I think the more setups we get, the more interesting it will be to see how things differ.
well its adding resistance to the flow. It would be choked if flowrate couldnt increase, and I dont think we hit that condition ever

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:01 PM.