Notices
DIY Turbo Discussion greddy on a 1.8? homebrew kit?

If EFR budget...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 2, 2014 | 01:01 PM
  #1  
astroboy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,787
Total Cats: 6
From: oahu
Default If EFR budget...

A two part query for you:

If you had the budget for a efr 7163 and a chassis waiting on power would you consider anything else (gtx, comp triple ball bearing, ect)?

Why?

I have the chassis, powerplant to support, and have done my research but need to get a new Mani built to insert said turbo and am looking for some other opinions. Thanks guys.
Old Jul 2, 2014 | 01:04 PM
  #2  
Savington's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,106
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Default

Not really. Maybe re-evaluate your power goals and decide whether you really want/need 500whp, and if you can live with 450, look at a 6758 to improve low-end power.
Old Jul 2, 2014 | 02:30 PM
  #3  
Ryan_G's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,568
Total Cats: 217
From: Tampa, Florida
Default

Originally Posted by Savington
Not really. Maybe re-evaluate your power goals and decide whether you really want/need 500whp, and if you can live with 450, look at a 6758 to improve low-end power.
Although I agree that making sure 500rwhp is something you are actually looking for I would like to add that the testing I have seen of the two turbo's back to back show that the 7163 out performs the 6758 in almost every way because it is a gen 2 design.

EDIT: I also understand that this is a full throttle run and does not provide part throttle or transient response data but my throttle only has 2 positions anyway



EDIT 2: Not a built bp but the behavioral characteristics are still relevant.
I ran a GT2860RS and GT2871R with a Tial turbine housing and external gate on my car (2.0Lt on E85) before moving to the EFR turbos.

Car is now running an EFR7163 after initially having the EFR6758. The 6785 out flowed the GT2817R, had better spool (boost threshold) and better transient response than the GT8271. The 7163 was around the same boost threshold but way outflowed it and has better transients. It was making around 325kw ATW's before we ran out of injector so it might have a little more in it but I think the turbine housing is going to start choking it off pretty soon.
Attached Thumbnails If EFR budget...-efr7163vs6758bad17bar.jpg  
Old Jul 2, 2014 | 03:41 PM
  #4  
soviet's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 3,493
Total Cats: 269
From: VA
Default

Until there is an acceptable transmission solution I can't really recommend anything except 6258.
Old Jul 3, 2014 | 03:09 AM
  #5  
astroboy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,787
Total Cats: 6
From: oahu
Default

So the goal is 300 HP with low boost but also to have the ability to run a higher pressure and not be limited by the turbo or fuel. I feel I have the supporting items to do that before going with a new engine management system and a vvt head (these are the next steps for me).
Old Jul 3, 2014 | 09:37 AM
  #6  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

get the 6258
Old Jul 3, 2014 | 10:45 AM
  #7  
soviet's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 3,493
Total Cats: 269
From: VA
Default

I made you a chart
Attached Thumbnails If EFR budget...-untitled.png  
Reply
Leave a poscat 23 Leave a negcat
Old Jul 3, 2014 | 02:11 PM
  #8  
concealer404's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,917
Total Cats: 2,206
Default

Gooby plz!
Old Jul 3, 2014 | 02:26 PM
  #9  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

wish I could probab that 10 more times
Old Jul 3, 2014 | 02:44 PM
  #10  
Savington's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,106
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Default

Originally Posted by astroboy
So the goal is 300 HP
Get a 6258.
Old Jul 3, 2014 | 03:53 PM
  #11  
Chiburbian's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,331
Total Cats: 204
From: Loganville, GA
Default

Along these lines... I already have a Precision 4828 which is supposedly a potato with some better parts. It is on a BEGI cast manifold. Would it make sense to move the precision turbo over to an EFR compatable manifold and fab a downpipe until I can afford to build the motor (hopefully get better spool out of it) or should I just hold off and do the EFR at the same time as the manifold/downpipe? I am at about 230whp now but I feel like I am not hitting 10psi boost until 4,300 rpm or so.

(my spool data
https://www.miataturbo.net/diy-turbo...2/#post1140285

Current downpipe is BEGI non-divorced gases pipe that exits to 2.5" and it continues 2.5" to the muffler at which point it exits at 3". I am holding off upgrading the mid-pipe until I also do the downpipe...

If my goal is to improve spool and reduce the amount of parts bought twice, where is the smart money?

Given the following future upgrades: build engine with forged rods, EFR 6758 or 6258, EFR compatable manfold, 3" turbo to tailpipe.

Also, consider that the block is stock for now.
Old Jul 3, 2014 | 04:04 PM
  #12  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

if you want spool your money needs to go to tubular hotside parts and a proper 3" tbe
I'm also assuming you're already running ebc and the wga arm is tight. (forgot your mod list already)
Old Jul 3, 2014 | 04:23 PM
  #13  
Chiburbian's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,331
Total Cats: 204
From: Loganville, GA
Default

Originally Posted by 18psi
if you want spool your money needs to go to tubular hotside parts and a proper 3" tbe
I'm also assuming you're already running ebc and the wga arm is tight. (forgot your mod list already)
^ Yes.

To isolate one question I asked above, can I mount my current turbo on a tubular manifold designed for an EFR? Obviously it would be a different downpipe than an EFR but if I am going to replace something, i'd rather it be the downpipe. Heck, I might even be able to modify the downpipe to make it work, but then that might be almost as much money as a brand new one?
Old Jul 3, 2014 | 04:39 PM
  #14  
astroboy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,787
Total Cats: 6
From: oahu
Default

Sounds like an efr it is. Thanks guys
Old Jul 3, 2014 | 06:24 PM
  #15  
Twodoor's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 628
Total Cats: 44
From: Meridian, Mississippi
Default

One point here,

Never use a dynapack dyno to show differences in spool up of different turbos. You can program the ramp rate of the dynapack which allows you to set it to increase RPM's from 2000 to 4000 very slowly, and this will tend to make a large turbo spool at a much lower RPM than it would if RPM's increased at a faster rate. I'm not sure if other load cell dyno's can do this but I know that the dynapack can.

Keith
Old Jul 3, 2014 | 09:20 PM
  #16  
ctdrftna's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,146
Total Cats: 56
From: Cromwell CT
Default

what is the availability like on these things now?
Old Jul 3, 2014 | 09:34 PM
  #17  
Leafy's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 9,491
Total Cats: 105
From: NH
Default

Originally Posted by Ryan_G
Although I agree that making sure 500rwhp is something you are actually looking for I would like to add that the testing I have seen of the two turbo's back to back show that the 7163 out performs the 6758 in almost every way because it is a gen 2 design.

EDIT: I also understand that this is a full throttle run and does not provide part throttle or transient response data but my throttle only has 2 positions anyway



EDIT 2: Not a built bp but the behavioral characteristics are still relevant.
Stop using this graph please. The 6758 had the TGVs stuck closed on a bank and the 7163 was the pre-release version with the not as good compressor wheel.
Old Jul 9, 2014 | 07:20 AM
  #18  
muoto's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 414
Total Cats: 69
From: Finland
Default

Originally Posted by soviet
Until there is an acceptable transmission solution I can't really recommend anything except 6258.
This.
Old Jul 9, 2014 | 08:11 AM
  #19  
BoostedSmurf's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 403
Total Cats: 65
From: Windsor, Ontario
Default

Originally Posted by muoto
This.
What's wrong with a TII drivetrain?
Old Jul 9, 2014 | 08:24 AM
  #20  
Leafy's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 9,491
Total Cats: 105
From: NH
Default

Originally Posted by BoostedSmurf
What's wrong with a TII drivetrain?
Gearing.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:56 PM.