DIY Turbo Discussion greddy on a 1.8? homebrew kit?

Indicated AFRs misbehaving

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-09-2014, 09:21 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Schuyler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 1,332
Total Cats: 87
Default Indicated AFRs misbehaving

So, recently my AFRs have started behaving very sporadically, with no changes to my tune whatsoever. Before, WOT would get me mostly under 13:1, sometimes upwards around 13.2. N/A. Now, it's solid 15s/16s. It goes rich between gears and on decel (though this is probably just a lack of overrun)

Initially, since this all just suddenly started happening, I thought maybe my pre-cat (CA-spec car) had become clogged. I still think this may be a possibility, but I now have to helicoil a hole in my head due to the bolt bringing 2/3 of the threads with it, and I stopped swapping them there. I'll reapproach this idea when I have time.

Tune and Log attached. Ignore the AFR target table. It has been modified, but the VE table hasn't. Haven't run VEAL or enabled EGO since.

Suggestions?
Wideband issue?
Car is actually running at those AFRs?
Attached Files
File Type: msl
weird AFR.msl (742.7 KB, 126 views)
File Type: msq
Schuyler is offline  
Old 11-09-2014, 09:34 PM
  #2  
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
deezums's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Kansas
Posts: 3,146
Total Cats: 201
Default

Did you calibrate your wideband recently?

Any old logs? Has your pulsewidth dropped at the lean conditions?
deezums is offline  
Old 11-09-2014, 09:35 PM
  #3  
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joe Perez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,020
Total Cats: 6,588
Default

Disclaimer: I've never dealt with a clogged cat first-hand.

Originally Posted by Schuyler
Initially, since this all just suddenly started happening, I thought maybe my pre-cat (CA-spec car) had become clogged.
What makes you think this?

Having no actual experience in the matter, I would think that a plugged catalytic converter would manifest itself in the form of richer AFRs, not leaner. By restricting the exhaust flow, you're going to get less intake air for the same MAP. Less air with same amount of fuel = richer AFR.
Joe Perez is offline  
Old 11-09-2014, 09:45 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Schuyler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 1,332
Total Cats: 87
Default

Originally Posted by Joe Perez
Disclaimer: I've never dealt with a clogged cat first-hand.
What makes you think this?

Having no actual experience in the matter, I would think that a plugged catalytic converter would manifest itself in the form of richer AFRs, not leaner. By restricting the exhaust flow, you're going to get less intake air for the same MAP. Less air with same amount of fuel = richer AFR.
Honestly, my initial thoughts were the same. All I knew was that I've been told clogged cats before a wideband make them behave "unexpectedly," and that the pre-cats are very fragile. I guess you could saw I was clutching at straws at this point. My only thought currently is the clogged cat would be effectively filtering more, as the air is forced to make its way through narrower openings.
(EDIT: just adding for anyone not familiar with the cal-spec setup. This cat is part of the header, so the wideband is POST cat (well, after the first cat, before the second))

Originally Posted by deezums
Did you calibrate your wideband recently?

Any old logs? Has your pulsewidth dropped at the lean conditions?
Most recent logs I had aside from those are attached. And sorry, meant to specify in the initial post, AEM EUGO. Which aside from the calibration between MS and the gauge (which is 1:1 atm), there is no calibration button etc. like on the LC1.

EDIT: the other was too big to upload here. https://www.dropbox.com/s/gtorfrt4ub...42.09.msl?dl=0
Attached Files
Schuyler is offline  
Old 11-09-2014, 09:52 PM
  #5  
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
deezums's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Kansas
Posts: 3,146
Total Cats: 201
Default



Similar conditions, but a lot less PW and a lot leaner mix. Are you sure nothing changed?
Attached Thumbnails Indicated AFRs misbehaving-pwcompare_zps253fba6f.png  
deezums is offline  
Old 11-09-2014, 10:04 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Schuyler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 1,332
Total Cats: 87
Default

Originally Posted by deezums

Similar conditions, but a lot less PW and a lot leaner mix. Are you sure nothing changed?
Current tune to 9-28-14 19:16:
AFR Targets, SD card logging disabled, Sensor checking disabled (CEL).

Don't see anything that has changed since then that should effect VE.
Schuyler is offline  
Old 11-09-2014, 10:35 PM
  #7  
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joe Perez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,020
Total Cats: 6,588
Default

Originally Posted by Schuyler
(EDIT: just adding for anyone not familiar with the cal-spec setup. This cat is part of the header, so the wideband is POST cat (well, after the first cat, before the second))
Ah- I missed that part, assumed you were running the wideband before the cat.

Is this even a valid configuration? Running a wideband after the pre-cat? I mean, the factory NB02 sensor is before the first cat, I can't imagine how the readings wouldn't be distorted by placing a wideband after it.

[/voice of absolutely no experience whatsoever]
Joe Perez is offline  
Old 11-09-2014, 10:41 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Schuyler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 1,332
Total Cats: 87
Default

Originally Posted by Joe Perez
Ah- I missed that part, assumed you were running the wideband before the cat.

Is this even a valid configuration? Running a wideband after the pre-cat? I mean, the factory NB02 sensor is before the first cat, I can't imagine how the readings wouldn't be distorted by placing a wideband after it.

[/voice of absolutely no experience whatsoever]
Oh I completely agree they will be distorted to some degree, but I decided to go ahead and install the ms and get familiar with it before boost, as in theory the readings should always read leaner than reality, resulting in a richer (read:safe) tune. Plugs have never been overly rich, so I've never really worried about it, until now when things just seem completely out of the ball park. The fact I've ran a potentially rich tune for ~6mo now was also more rational for a clogged cat.

Name:  AGjPbvzl.jpg
Views: 11
Size:  34.2 KB
(Picture taken recently (in the past week))
Schuyler is offline  
Old 11-10-2014, 08:38 AM
  #9  
Elite Member
iTrader: (5)
 
BTMiata's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 1,512
Total Cats: 30
Default

Isn't 13:1 crazy dangerous to begin with?

*Edit never-mind I mis-read your sig and thought you were FI
BTMiata is offline  
Old 11-11-2014, 02:21 PM
  #10  
Junior Member
 
sharkythesharkdogg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Anderson, SC
Posts: 146
Total Cats: 9
Default

I suppose nothing obvious like exhaust leak around the pre-cat joints or head is likely? Can you smoke the system? Sometimes they're small enough not to be that audible but still cause weird AFRs.
sharkythesharkdogg is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
satisfied
MEGAsquirt
144
11-05-2018 04:05 PM
itsMikey
MSPNP
3
09-28-2015 06:40 AM
elior77
MEGAsquirt
30
09-23-2015 06:38 PM
eunosgippa
MEGAsquirt
0
09-09-2015 05:19 PM
Motorsport-Electronics
ECUs and Tuning
0
09-05-2015 08:02 AM



Quick Reply: Indicated AFRs misbehaving



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:34 AM.