Notices
DIY Turbo Discussion greddy on a 1.8? homebrew kit?

Intake Manifold Modification... And more.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 21, 2008 | 09:37 PM
  #1  
patsmx5's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 9,405
Total Cats: 558
From: Houston, TX
Default Intake Manifold Modification... And more.

So yeah, I did this. Should have been doing other things, but I couldn't resist.

Name:  100_1858.jpg
Views: 3235
Size:  195.9 KB

Name:  100_1859.jpg
Views: 2836
Size:  199.2 KB

Name:  100_1860.jpg
Views: 1983
Size:  123.2 KB

Name:  100_1861.jpg
Views: 1980
Size:  194.1 KB

Name:  100_1862.jpg
Views: 1917
Size:  163.9 KB

Name:  100_1863.jpg
Views: 1870
Size:  174.8 KB

Name:  100_1868.jpg
Views: 2182
Size:  163.8 KB

Name:  100_1869.jpg
Views: 1831
Size:  169.3 KB

Name:  100_1870.jpg
Views: 2287
Size:  173.6 KB




Also, added two ports to the now larger plenum. One for the wastegate, one for BOV. Made a hardline to go to the wastegate. Will make one for the BOV when I do charge pipes.

Favorite pic.
Name:  100_1873.jpg
Views: 1866
Size:  198.2 KB

Name:  100_1878.jpg
Views: 1929
Size:  172.2 KB

Name:  100_1879.jpg
Views: 1862
Size:  175.5 KB

Name:  100_1880.jpg
Views: 1869
Size:  138.1 KB

Name:  100_1881.jpg
Views: 2033
Size:  186.4 KB

Name:  100_1882.jpg
Views: 1841
Size:  88.8 KB
Old Dec 21, 2008 | 09:58 PM
  #2  
patsmx5's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 9,405
Total Cats: 558
From: Houston, TX
Default

One more:

Name:  100_1875.jpg
Views: 1840
Size:  147.3 KB
Old Dec 21, 2008 | 10:19 PM
  #3  
Toddcod's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,829
Total Cats: 0
From: Dallas
Default

Ok, what difference is that going to make? Is it going to jack up idle?
Just curious. I have a spare motor. If this would make alot of power, i could do it tommorrow.

Brain, Joe, what up with it.

What do you think will be the con's and Pro's of doing this?
Old Dec 21, 2008 | 10:45 PM
  #4  
patsmx5's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 9,405
Total Cats: 558
From: Houston, TX
Default

Basically I removed the "ceiling" above the butterfly valves so that when they open *gasp* air can pass through them. Before, they were VICS, a resonance chamber. Now it's another set of runners to feed the engine air. Should help top end power. Artie Partie dyno'd doing this on a turbo car and had good results.
Old Dec 21, 2008 | 10:50 PM
  #5  
99NBMia's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 322
Total Cats: 0
From: So Cal
Default

Good stuff
Old Dec 21, 2008 | 11:49 PM
  #6  
Toddcod's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,829
Total Cats: 0
From: Dallas
Default

Does the 1.6L have this? And does cutting it out, hurt low end?
Old Dec 22, 2008 | 12:15 AM
  #7  
cjernigan's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 8,091
Total Cats: 7
From: Atlanta, GA
Default

Originally Posted by patsmx5
Basically I removed the "ceiling" above the butterfly valves so that when they open *gasp* air can pass through them. Before, they were VICS, a resonance chamber. Now it's another set of runners to feed the engine air. Should help top end power. Artie Partie dyno'd doing this on a turbo car and had good results.
He actually removed all of the VICS and runners out of the lower portion as well. Basically making it a huge plenum with smooth runners. Modifying the lower portion requires some aluminum welding though.

Originally Posted by Toddcod
Does the 1.6L have this? And does cutting it out, hurt low end?
No it doesn't have that.
Old Dec 22, 2008 | 12:42 AM
  #8  
musanovic's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 707
Total Cats: 2
From: North Cackalackey
Default

nice job man love the work and u got some good posts keep it up. i wish i did the hard lines they are soooo much cleaner looking damn
Old Dec 22, 2008 | 02:52 AM
  #9  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

I'm curious as to how much power it will add..I've seen the other one, and this one will be the second, so it will either prove this mod worth it or not. unless its 20hp+, I wont bother with mine.
Old Dec 22, 2008 | 09:11 AM
  #10  
hustler's Avatar
Tour de Franzia
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 29,085
Total Cats: 375
From: Republic of Dallas
Default

i just realized that I forgot to jack with vics on my car before it hits the dyno. I was just going to take the butterfly out.
Old Dec 22, 2008 | 09:36 AM
  #11  
johndoe's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,970
Total Cats: 1
From: NYC
Default

Remember though that Artie never dynod it with the VICS working. So his comparison was with VICS there but doing nothing compared to VICS removed. The gain might be smaller if the comparison included working VICS.
Old Dec 22, 2008 | 09:55 AM
  #12  
patsmx5's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 9,405
Total Cats: 558
From: Houston, TX
Default

I've done a lot of headwork to my motor. So it flows more than most 99's. The stock intake manifold was holding it back. I hope this helps some. I still plan to build/buy a new one this summer.
Old Dec 22, 2008 | 09:28 PM
  #13  
TurboTim's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 7,033
Total Cats: 425
From: Chesterfield, NJ
Default

Originally Posted by johndoe
Remember though that Artie never dynod it with the VICS working. So his comparison was with VICS there but doing nothing compared to VICS removed. The gain might be smaller if the comparison included working VICS.
I don't remember how the VICS works, but I thought the VICS was activated by engine vacuum. So with Artie's car on the dyno at WOT and the VICS not hooked up the VICS position should be the same as if it were hooked up, i.e. deactivated? If true, VICS may help him in part throttle driving, not at WOT.

Or am I wrong here (yeah I can search but what's the fun in that)? Does the OEM ECU use that small vacuum chamber to keep the VICS active during WOT? If so, yah an active VICS "before" would make the comparison nicer.
Old Dec 22, 2008 | 09:33 PM
  #14  
patsmx5's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 9,405
Total Cats: 558
From: Houston, TX
Default

The vics will be open unless the solenoid is energized and therefore were "working" even if they weren't plugged in. No idea where it gets vacuum from at WOT though.
Old Dec 23, 2008 | 03:00 AM
  #15  
VanMSM's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 129
Total Cats: 6
From: Vancouver, BC
Default

Originally Posted by patsmx5
Also, added two ports to the now larger plenum. One for the wastegate, one for BOV. Made a hardline to go to the wastegate. Will make one for the BOV when I do charge pipes.
Why don't you just use the port on the turbo compressor outlet for the wastegate source? Supposedly quicker response the closer it is to the turbo. Also, your spool is gonna suffer without even a simple ball&spring MBC...but I assume that's your intent initially.
Old Dec 23, 2008 | 09:03 AM
  #16  
musanovic's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 707
Total Cats: 2
From: North Cackalackey
Default

Originally Posted by VanMSM
Also, your spool is gonna suffer without even a simple ball&spring MBC...but I assume that's your intent initially.
how do you get to this logic?
Old Dec 23, 2008 | 09:32 AM
  #17  
olderguy's Avatar
AFM Crusader
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,716
Total Cats: 364
From: Wayne, NJ
Default

I don't see a coolant reroute in process
Old Dec 23, 2008 | 09:34 AM
  #18  
olderguy's Avatar
AFM Crusader
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,716
Total Cats: 364
From: Wayne, NJ
Default

INHO the wastegate actuated off the intake manifold gives you more accurate control and makes up for piping loses.
Old Dec 23, 2008 | 09:44 AM
  #19  
rharris19's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,417
Total Cats: 20
From: Seabrook, TX
Default

I was under the impression that the VICS worked off of rpm and not vacuum. Maybe that is just the way that i ahd to hook mine up since it is a 92 and did not have the controls to begin with. I have mine activated through a MSD pill switch.
Old Dec 23, 2008 | 10:14 AM
  #20  
patsmx5's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 9,405
Total Cats: 558
From: Houston, TX
Default

Originally Posted by VanMSM
Why don't you just use the port on the turbo compressor outlet for the wastegate source? Supposedly quicker response the closer it is to the turbo. Also, your spool is gonna suffer without even a simple ball&spring MBC...but I assume that's your intent initially.
As olderguy said, I'd rather have XX boost to the engine all the time, not XX boost coming out of the turbo that will drop more and more as flow through the IC changes.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:17 AM.