Miata Turbo Forum - Boost cars, acquire cats.

Miata Turbo Forum - Boost cars, acquire cats. (https://www.miataturbo.net/)
-   DIY Turbo Discussion (https://www.miataturbo.net/diy-turbo-discussion-14/)
-   -   Intake Manifold Modification... And more. (https://www.miataturbo.net/diy-turbo-discussion-14/intake-manifold-modification-more-29501/)

patsmx5 12-21-2008 09:37 PM

Intake Manifold Modification... And more.
 
15 Attachment(s)
So yeah, I did this. Should have been doing other things, but I couldn't resist.

Attachment 209464

Attachment 209465

Attachment 209466

Attachment 209467

Attachment 209468

Attachment 209469

Attachment 209470

Attachment 209471

Attachment 209472




Also, added two ports to the now larger plenum. One for the wastegate, one for BOV. Made a hardline to go to the wastegate. Will make one for the BOV when I do charge pipes.

Favorite pic. :)
Attachment 209473

Attachment 209474

Attachment 209475

Attachment 209476

Attachment 209477

Attachment 209478

patsmx5 12-21-2008 09:58 PM

1 Attachment(s)
One more:

Attachment 209463

Toddcod 12-21-2008 10:19 PM

Ok, what difference is that going to make? Is it going to jack up idle?
Just curious. I have a spare motor. If this would make alot of power, i could do it tommorrow.

Brain, Joe, what up with it.:)

What do you think will be the con's and Pro's of doing this?

patsmx5 12-21-2008 10:45 PM

Basically I removed the "ceiling" above the butterfly valves so that when they open *gasp* air can pass through them. Before, they were VICS, a resonance chamber. Now it's another set of runners to feed the engine air. Should help top end power. Artie Partie dyno'd doing this on a turbo car and had good results.

99NBMia 12-21-2008 10:50 PM

Good stuff :)

Toddcod 12-21-2008 11:49 PM

Does the 1.6L have this? And does cutting it out, hurt low end?

cjernigan 12-22-2008 12:15 AM


Originally Posted by patsmx5 (Post 344182)
Basically I removed the "ceiling" above the butterfly valves so that when they open *gasp* air can pass through them. Before, they were VICS, a resonance chamber. Now it's another set of runners to feed the engine air. Should help top end power. Artie Partie dyno'd doing this on a turbo car and had good results.

He actually removed all of the VICS and runners out of the lower portion as well. Basically making it a huge plenum with smooth runners. Modifying the lower portion requires some aluminum welding though.


Originally Posted by Toddcod (Post 344201)
Does the 1.6L have this? And does cutting it out, hurt low end?

No it doesn't have that.

musanovic 12-22-2008 12:42 AM

nice job man love the work and u got some good posts keep it up. i wish i did the hard lines they are soooo much cleaner looking damn

18psi 12-22-2008 02:52 AM

I'm curious as to how much power it will add..I've seen the other one, and this one will be the second, so it will either prove this mod worth it or not. unless its 20hp+, I wont bother with mine.

hustler 12-22-2008 09:11 AM

i just realized that I forgot to jack with vics on my car before it hits the dyno. I was just going to take the butterfly out.

johndoe 12-22-2008 09:36 AM

Remember though that Artie never dynod it with the VICS working. So his comparison was with VICS there but doing nothing compared to VICS removed. The gain might be smaller if the comparison included working VICS.

patsmx5 12-22-2008 09:55 AM

I've done a lot of headwork to my motor. So it flows more than most 99's. :) The stock intake manifold was holding it back. I hope this helps some. I still plan to build/buy a new one this summer.

TurboTim 12-22-2008 09:28 PM


Originally Posted by johndoe (Post 344278)
Remember though that Artie never dynod it with the VICS working. So his comparison was with VICS there but doing nothing compared to VICS removed. The gain might be smaller if the comparison included working VICS.

I don't remember how the VICS works, but I thought the VICS was activated by engine vacuum. So with Artie's car on the dyno at WOT and the VICS not hooked up the VICS position should be the same as if it were hooked up, i.e. deactivated? If true, VICS may help him in part throttle driving, not at WOT.

Or am I wrong here (yeah I can search but what's the fun in that)? Does the OEM ECU use that small vacuum chamber to keep the VICS active during WOT? If so, yah an active VICS "before" would make the comparison nicer.

patsmx5 12-22-2008 09:33 PM

The vics will be open unless the solenoid is energized and therefore were "working" even if they weren't plugged in. No idea where it gets vacuum from at WOT though.

VanMSM 12-23-2008 03:00 AM


Originally Posted by patsmx5 (Post 344156)
Also, added two ports to the now larger plenum. One for the wastegate, one for BOV. Made a hardline to go to the wastegate. Will make one for the BOV when I do charge pipes.

Why don't you just use the port on the turbo compressor outlet for the wastegate source? Supposedly quicker response the closer it is to the turbo. Also, your spool is gonna suffer without even a simple ball&spring MBC...but I assume that's your intent initially.

musanovic 12-23-2008 09:03 AM


Originally Posted by VanMSM (Post 344657)
Also, your spool is gonna suffer without even a simple ball&spring MBC...but I assume that's your intent initially.

how do you get to this logic?

olderguy 12-23-2008 09:32 AM

I don't see a coolant reroute in process:eek5:

olderguy 12-23-2008 09:34 AM

INHO the wastegate actuated off the intake manifold gives you more accurate control and makes up for piping loses.

rharris19 12-23-2008 09:44 AM

I was under the impression that the VICS worked off of rpm and not vacuum. Maybe that is just the way that i ahd to hook mine up since it is a 92 and did not have the controls to begin with. I have mine activated through a MSD pill switch.

patsmx5 12-23-2008 10:14 AM


Originally Posted by VanMSM (Post 344657)
Why don't you just use the port on the turbo compressor outlet for the wastegate source? Supposedly quicker response the closer it is to the turbo. Also, your spool is gonna suffer without even a simple ball&spring MBC...but I assume that's your intent initially.

As olderguy said, I'd rather have XX boost to the engine all the time, not XX boost coming out of the turbo that will drop more and more as flow through the IC changes.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:12 AM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands