Intake Manifold Modification... And more. - Miata Turbo Forum - Boost cars, acquire cats.

DIY Turbo Discussion greddy on a 1.8? homebrew kit?
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Intake Manifold Modification... And more.

Old 12-21-2008, 10:37 PM
  #1  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (15)
 
patsmx5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 8,824
Total Cats: 268
Default Intake Manifold Modification... And more.

So yeah, I did this. Should have been doing other things, but I couldn't resist.

Name:  100_1858.jpg
Views: 624
Size:  195.9 KB

Name:  100_1859.jpg
Views: 761
Size:  199.2 KB

Name:  100_1860.jpg
Views: 467
Size:  123.2 KB

Name:  100_1861.jpg
Views: 450
Size:  194.1 KB

Name:  100_1862.jpg
Views: 481
Size:  163.9 KB

Name:  100_1863.jpg
Views: 451
Size:  174.8 KB

Name:  100_1868.jpg
Views: 463
Size:  163.8 KB

Name:  100_1869.jpg
Views: 445
Size:  169.3 KB

Name:  100_1870.jpg
Views: 650
Size:  173.6 KB




Also, added two ports to the now larger plenum. One for the wastegate, one for BOV. Made a hardline to go to the wastegate. Will make one for the BOV when I do charge pipes.

Favorite pic.
Name:  100_1873.jpg
Views: 449
Size:  198.2 KB

Name:  100_1878.jpg
Views: 484
Size:  172.2 KB

Name:  100_1879.jpg
Views: 454
Size:  175.5 KB

Name:  100_1880.jpg
Views: 455
Size:  138.1 KB

Name:  100_1881.jpg
Views: 494
Size:  186.4 KB

Name:  100_1882.jpg
Views: 453
Size:  88.8 KB
patsmx5 is offline  
Old 12-21-2008, 10:58 PM
  #2  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (15)
 
patsmx5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 8,824
Total Cats: 268
Default

One more:

Name:  100_1875.jpg
Views: 410
Size:  147.3 KB
patsmx5 is offline  
Old 12-21-2008, 11:19 PM
  #3  
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Dallas
Posts: 1,830
Total Cats: 0
Default

Ok, what difference is that going to make? Is it going to jack up idle?
Just curious. I have a spare motor. If this would make alot of power, i could do it tommorrow.

Brain, Joe, what up with it.

What do you think will be the con's and Pro's of doing this?
Toddcod is offline  
Old 12-21-2008, 11:45 PM
  #4  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (15)
 
patsmx5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 8,824
Total Cats: 268
Default

Basically I removed the "ceiling" above the butterfly valves so that when they open *gasp* air can pass through them. Before, they were VICS, a resonance chamber. Now it's another set of runners to feed the engine air. Should help top end power. Artie Partie dyno'd doing this on a turbo car and had good results.
patsmx5 is offline  
Old 12-21-2008, 11:50 PM
  #5  
Junior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: So Cal
Posts: 322
Total Cats: 0
Default

Good stuff
99NBMia is offline  
Old 12-22-2008, 12:49 AM
  #6  
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Dallas
Posts: 1,830
Total Cats: 0
Default

Does the 1.6L have this? And does cutting it out, hurt low end?
Toddcod is offline  
Old 12-22-2008, 01:15 AM
  #7  
Elite Member
iTrader: (13)
 
cjernigan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 8,140
Total Cats: 6
Default

Originally Posted by patsmx5 View Post
Basically I removed the "ceiling" above the butterfly valves so that when they open *gasp* air can pass through them. Before, they were VICS, a resonance chamber. Now it's another set of runners to feed the engine air. Should help top end power. Artie Partie dyno'd doing this on a turbo car and had good results.
He actually removed all of the VICS and runners out of the lower portion as well. Basically making it a huge plenum with smooth runners. Modifying the lower portion requires some aluminum welding though.

Originally Posted by Toddcod View Post
Does the 1.6L have this? And does cutting it out, hurt low end?
No it doesn't have that.
cjernigan is offline  
Old 12-22-2008, 01:42 AM
  #8  
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: North Cackalackey
Posts: 707
Total Cats: 2
Default

nice job man love the work and u got some good posts keep it up. i wish i did the hard lines they are soooo much cleaner looking damn
musanovic is offline  
Old 12-22-2008, 03:52 AM
  #9  
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
18psi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,125
Total Cats: 3,133
Default

I'm curious as to how much power it will add..I've seen the other one, and this one will be the second, so it will either prove this mod worth it or not. unless its 20hp+, I wont bother with mine.
18psi is offline  
Old 12-22-2008, 10:11 AM
  #10  
Tour de Franzia
iTrader: (6)
 
hustler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Republic of Dallas
Posts: 29,085
Total Cats: 367
Default

i just realized that I forgot to jack with vics on my car before it hits the dyno. I was just going to take the butterfly out.
hustler is offline  
Old 12-22-2008, 10:36 AM
  #11  
Elite Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,970
Total Cats: 1
Default

Remember though that Artie never dynod it with the VICS working. So his comparison was with VICS there but doing nothing compared to VICS removed. The gain might be smaller if the comparison included working VICS.
johndoe is offline  
Old 12-22-2008, 10:55 AM
  #12  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (15)
 
patsmx5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 8,824
Total Cats: 268
Default

I've done a lot of headwork to my motor. So it flows more than most 99's. The stock intake manifold was holding it back. I hope this helps some. I still plan to build/buy a new one this summer.
patsmx5 is offline  
Old 12-22-2008, 10:28 PM
  #13  
Elite Member
iTrader: (9)
 
TurboTim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chesterfield, NJ
Posts: 6,570
Total Cats: 283
Default

Originally Posted by johndoe View Post
Remember though that Artie never dynod it with the VICS working. So his comparison was with VICS there but doing nothing compared to VICS removed. The gain might be smaller if the comparison included working VICS.
I don't remember how the VICS works, but I thought the VICS was activated by engine vacuum. So with Artie's car on the dyno at WOT and the VICS not hooked up the VICS position should be the same as if it were hooked up, i.e. deactivated? If true, VICS may help him in part throttle driving, not at WOT.

Or am I wrong here (yeah I can search but what's the fun in that)? Does the OEM ECU use that small vacuum chamber to keep the VICS active during WOT? If so, yah an active VICS "before" would make the comparison nicer.
TurboTim is offline  
Old 12-22-2008, 10:33 PM
  #14  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (15)
 
patsmx5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 8,824
Total Cats: 268
Default

The vics will be open unless the solenoid is energized and therefore were "working" even if they weren't plugged in. No idea where it gets vacuum from at WOT though.
patsmx5 is offline  
Old 12-23-2008, 04:00 AM
  #15  
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 129
Total Cats: 6
Default

Originally Posted by patsmx5 View Post
Also, added two ports to the now larger plenum. One for the wastegate, one for BOV. Made a hardline to go to the wastegate. Will make one for the BOV when I do charge pipes.
Why don't you just use the port on the turbo compressor outlet for the wastegate source? Supposedly quicker response the closer it is to the turbo. Also, your spool is gonna suffer without even a simple ball&spring MBC...but I assume that's your intent initially.
VanMSM is offline  
Old 12-23-2008, 10:03 AM
  #16  
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: North Cackalackey
Posts: 707
Total Cats: 2
Default

Originally Posted by VanMSM View Post
Also, your spool is gonna suffer without even a simple ball&spring MBC...but I assume that's your intent initially.
how do you get to this logic?
musanovic is offline  
Old 12-23-2008, 10:32 AM
  #17  
AFM Crusader
iTrader: (18)
 
olderguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Wayne, NJ
Posts: 4,549
Total Cats: 122
Default

I don't see a coolant reroute in process
olderguy is offline  
Old 12-23-2008, 10:34 AM
  #18  
AFM Crusader
iTrader: (18)
 
olderguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Wayne, NJ
Posts: 4,549
Total Cats: 122
Default

INHO the wastegate actuated off the intake manifold gives you more accurate control and makes up for piping loses.
olderguy is offline  
Old 12-23-2008, 10:44 AM
  #19  
Elite Member
iTrader: (41)
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Seabrook, TX
Posts: 2,417
Total Cats: 20
Default

I was under the impression that the VICS worked off of rpm and not vacuum. Maybe that is just the way that i ahd to hook mine up since it is a 92 and did not have the controls to begin with. I have mine activated through a MSD pill switch.
rharris19 is offline  
Old 12-23-2008, 11:14 AM
  #20  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (15)
 
patsmx5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 8,824
Total Cats: 268
Default

Originally Posted by VanMSM View Post
Why don't you just use the port on the turbo compressor outlet for the wastegate source? Supposedly quicker response the closer it is to the turbo. Also, your spool is gonna suffer without even a simple ball&spring MBC...but I assume that's your intent initially.
As olderguy said, I'd rather have XX boost to the engine all the time, not XX boost coming out of the turbo that will drop more and more as flow through the IC changes.
patsmx5 is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Intake Manifold Modification... And more.


Archive Advertising Cookie Policy Privacy Statement Terms of Service

© 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands

We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.