DIY Turbo Discussion greddy on a 1.8? homebrew kit?
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

intercooler pipeing/endtank size

 
Old 04-18-2008, 10:29 PM
  #1  
I'm Miserable!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
bryantaylor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: jacksonville, fl
Posts: 1,711
Total Cats: 0
Default intercooler pipeing/endtank size

i know most people here run 2 inch hot side and 2.5 cold side. same as me right now, and i have just shy of 2inch inlets on my endtanks (starion intercooler).

but the real question is when do you need to run bigger pipeing and why?

i just did a t3/t4 and plan on running upwards of 15psi (its on 7psi right now) is there really a point were any of us need to be running a full 2.5 inch charge setup from the turbo all the way to the mani? does the extra 1/2inch make any difference at all?
bryantaylor is offline  
Old 04-18-2008, 11:28 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: North Cackalackey
Posts: 707
Total Cats: 2
Default

no. not that much at the psi you are going to be running.
my friend with a VW GTI is running about 2 inch hot side and 2.5 cold side with 23psi and no flow problem. if you want to invest extra money go ahead but i don't see a need.
musanovic is offline  
Old 04-19-2008, 12:28 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Guam (U.S Terr.)
Posts: 786
Total Cats: 0
Default

There was a thread about this not long ago and Braineack posted up something showing an equation that 2" pipe can hold like 350hp IIRC.
mike_671 is offline  
Old 04-19-2008, 10:50 AM
  #4  
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 72
Total Cats: 0
Default

FLOW - cubic foot per minute and balancing pressures - turbo output, intercooler inlet capabilities, intercooler flow volume, intercooler outlet, etc - seems the better balanced the total flow, the better the performance. Pipes too small, intercooler too big, yadda-yadda makes for poorer performance than having a balance across all of your stuff. A long time ago someone figured out the Starion IC's with 2" in/out and made a statement about them being more balanced against the turbo capabilities, that had to do with why they were more popular at the time. I ran the Starion setup that way and was just fine with the total performance of the system. I did a dyno years ago, can't remember what my RWHP was exactally but it was right at 200-something with my setup. I guess I'll have to find the paperwork.

Recently I decided that my pipes (mild steel) were looking a little shotty, so I am now re-doing my system with 2" out to IC, new IC that will handle about 600 cfm instead of the Starion's flow at somewhere around 525 cfm (which is perfectly good up to 5/6 lbs of boost with the stock Greddy) and 2-1/2" out the IC to the TB. Good, bad or indifferent, who knows, but I thought as long as I was re-doing things I'd make those changes.

I could have easily kept the Starion but I figured since new pipes I'd go to new intercooler as well.
93inNM is offline  
Old 04-19-2008, 03:16 PM
  #5  
I'm Miserable!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
bryantaylor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: jacksonville, fl
Posts: 1,711
Total Cats: 0
Default

some good info so far. but its nice that 2inch pipe will support 350hp, but with the rest of the system taying the same, will upgrading to 2.5inch yeild a gain?
bryantaylor is offline  
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
StratoBlue1109
Miata parts for sale/trade
21
09-30-2018 01:09 PM
Quinn
Cars for sale/trade
6
10-23-2016 07:58 AM
The Gleas
MEGAsquirt
3
10-01-2015 09:30 AM
itsMikey
MSPNP
3
09-28-2015 06:40 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: intercooler pipeing/endtank size


Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

© 2019 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands

We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.