Notices
DIY Turbo Discussion greddy on a 1.8? homebrew kit?

large honeycomb for in front of intercooler / radiator?

Old Feb 23, 2007 | 09:22 PM
  #1  
y8s's Avatar
y8s
Thread Starter
DEI liberal femininity
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 19,338
Total Cats: 574
From: Fake Virginia
Default large honeycomb for in front of intercooler / radiator?

so this maybe is an old trick or something BUT...

what do you all think about putting a honeycomb in the mouth of the car to keep air flowing INTO the IC/radiator?

I envison a 3-4" long (thick?) layer with 3/4-1.5" cells mounted against the IC in the front of the car.

Also perhaps a thinner version between the IC and radiator (touching both) to keep the flow from escaping out the sides/top/bottom.



Now the real question... where do you find this stuff? I bet you could get it from hexcel or something.... I think McMaster sells aluminum version but I'd rather have a plastic for resilience.


Gimme about 6 square feet to play with. I bet it helps TONS.

Matt
Old Feb 23, 2007 | 10:38 PM
  #2  
LOOINEY's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 198
Total Cats: 0
From: Winona, MN
Default

I bet it would help the flow compared to nothing but if your intercooler and radiator are inline with each other just form some ducting around it from the mouth of bumber. I see it work well for Vmounts so it should help?
Old Feb 23, 2007 | 10:49 PM
  #3  
mazda/nissan's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,075
Total Cats: 0
From: Lexington, SC
Default

bell engineering makes a plate to cover the top of the radiator and the frame so that air doesn't pass through the ic then rise to the hood instead of going through the radiator.
Old Feb 23, 2007 | 11:03 PM
  #4  
y8s's Avatar
y8s
Thread Starter
DEI liberal femininity
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 19,338
Total Cats: 574
From: Fake Virginia
Default

well even with the shrouds around the side, you get flow perpendicular to the plane of the rad/ic. there's not much room for flow anywhere but through the tube with the honeycomb.
Old Feb 23, 2007 | 11:27 PM
  #5  
jayc72's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,908
Total Cats: 1
From: Edmonton, AB
Default

Would the shape of the cells matter? could you use cylinders instead or a hex shape?

Reminds me of the mythbusters using drinking straws at the front of a mini wind tunnel they created.
Old Feb 23, 2007 | 11:33 PM
  #6  
LOOINEY's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 198
Total Cats: 0
From: Winona, MN
Default

you sugesting to glue a buch of plastic tubes and mounting that to the front? lol it could be a way to try it cheap...
Old Feb 23, 2007 | 11:44 PM
  #7  
jayc72's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,908
Total Cats: 1
From: Edmonton, AB
Default

I suggest nothing, just drawing a parallel. And maybe if the theory was the same, maybe using tubing would be cheaper and easier than something else exotic.
Old Feb 23, 2007 | 11:54 PM
  #8  
y8s's Avatar
y8s
Thread Starter
DEI liberal femininity
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 19,338
Total Cats: 574
From: Fake Virginia
Default

I'm sure it'd be easier and cheaper... but i'm idealizing. I mean you'd have little between-circle segments that might not flow so well...

so why not hex....
Old Feb 24, 2007 | 12:12 AM
  #9  
UofACATS's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,017
Total Cats: 0
From: Tucson "it's 110º" Arizona
Default

Originally Posted by y8s
well even with the shrouds around the side, you get flow perpendicular to the plane of the rad/ic. there's not much room for flow anywhere but through the tube with the honeycomb.
Thats true. I had not thought of that. I bet it would cut down on the turbulance inbetween the two. (My setup is AC/IC/RAD sandwiched, but there's a little space)

Originally Posted by y8s
you'd have little between-circle segments that might not flow so well... so why not hex....
Yes, hex much better. They actually fit together.

Personally, I like the idea in the nose of the car. Directed airflow.
Old Feb 24, 2007 | 02:42 AM
  #10  
akaryrye's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,557
Total Cats: 5
From: Central California
Default

Um im not totally sure I understand what you are trying to do here. Are you saying that you would have a shroud in front with tubes coming off of that shroud directed to the intercooler? If so, why not just make a shroud around the whole thing?
Old Feb 24, 2007 | 10:19 AM
  #11  
y8s's Avatar
y8s
Thread Starter
DEI liberal femininity
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 19,338
Total Cats: 574
From: Fake Virginia
Default

Originally Posted by akaryrye
Um im not totally sure I understand what you are trying to do here. Are you saying that you would have a shroud in front with tubes coming off of that shroud directed to the intercooler? If so, why not just make a shroud around the whole thing?
a big shround is an improvement over no shroud but this thing is an improvement over that (I think--hence my post)

It's AKA an "Air straightener" or "flow straightener"

http://www.fi.edu/flights/first/tunn..._settling.html

directs the turbulent air into and through the cores instead of anywhere else.
Old Feb 24, 2007 | 10:37 AM
  #12  
akaryrye's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,557
Total Cats: 5
From: Central California
Default

ah, thats pretty neat.
Old Feb 24, 2007 | 11:07 AM
  #13  
Mechazawa's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 147
Total Cats: 0
From: Farmington Valley, CT
Default

http://cgi.ebay.com/honeycomb-alumin...QQcmdZViewItem
Old Feb 24, 2007 | 11:19 AM
  #14  
olderguy's Avatar
AFM Crusader
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,716
Total Cats: 364
From: Wayne, NJ
Default

A turbulent flow will be more efficient at heat transfer than a laminar flow.
Old Feb 24, 2007 | 11:36 AM
  #15  
kotomile's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 7,537
Total Cats: 42
From: Monterey, CA
Default

I happen to be home this weekend, and asked my dad (lifelong mech. engineer and racer) what he thought of this. To paraphrase, he said that the outlet side is much more important. Remove any restriction from the backside of the radiator (he is speaking generally, but on a miata there's not much to remove) and box up the front side so air cannot escape around it. Any restriction in front of the radiator - even if it's intended to straighten flow - wouldn't be worth the weight or cost. Much more effective to ensure that the backside of the radiator is lower pressure than the front side.

Anyway, that's his opinion. I tend to think he's a pretty smart guy, but I'm biased.
Old Feb 24, 2007 | 11:49 AM
  #16  
y8s's Avatar
y8s
Thread Starter
DEI liberal femininity
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 19,338
Total Cats: 574
From: Fake Virginia
Default

turbulent flow is more efficient if you're talking about along a smooth surface where the air can mix and remove heat, but I'm talking about entering the radiator. it will still be turbulent once it gets to the IC/rad fins.

koto, thanks for the dad input--I actually got this idea from my dad a while back. he used to race cars

I'm thinking the obstruction in front of the IC would be virtually zero since the honeycombs are thin wall and large cell. about as restrictive as chicken wire, maybe less.

and yeah, can't do much about the back side. the fans pretty much are going to stay.
Old Feb 24, 2007 | 12:05 PM
  #17  
olderguy's Avatar
AFM Crusader
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,716
Total Cats: 364
From: Wayne, NJ
Default

so keeping both fans running would be the best bet?
Old Feb 24, 2007 | 02:58 PM
  #18  
y8s's Avatar
y8s
Thread Starter
DEI liberal femininity
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 19,338
Total Cats: 574
From: Fake Virginia
Default

Originally Posted by olderguy
so keeping both fans running would be the best bet?
that's all well and good for temps below say 230F...
Old Feb 24, 2007 | 04:59 PM
  #19  
PAT!'s Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 464
Total Cats: 0
Default

From what I've been told you will end up losing a significant percentage of flow. Take a look at how chickenwire or a screen door reacts on a windy day, now imagine if the wind was moving at 60+ mph... might as well be a a solid wall. I've been in three hurricanes and a tornado and I've seen chainlink fences blown flat.
Old Feb 24, 2007 | 06:34 PM
  #20  
y8s's Avatar
y8s
Thread Starter
DEI liberal femininity
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 19,338
Total Cats: 574
From: Fake Virginia
Default

Originally Posted by PAT!
From what I've been told you will end up losing a significant percentage of flow. Take a look at how chickenwire or a screen door reacts on a windy day, now imagine if the wind was moving at 60+ mph... might as well be a a solid wall. I've been in three hurricanes and a tornado and I've seen chainlink fences blown flat.
how does chicken wire in front of a picket fence fare? remember it's in front of a radiator.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Full_Tilt_Boogie
Build Threads
84
Apr 12, 2021 04:21 PM
StratoBlue1109
Miata parts for sale/trade
21
Sep 30, 2018 01:09 PM
tazswing
Race Prep
20
Oct 3, 2015 11:04 AM
The Gleas
MEGAsquirt
3
Oct 1, 2015 09:30 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:57 PM.