DIY Turbo Discussion greddy on a 1.8? homebrew kit?

Map Sensor feed position vs. output

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-04-2017, 11:30 AM
  #1  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
shlammed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Kingston, Ontario
Posts: 2,910
Total Cats: 51
Default Map Sensor feed position vs. output

Have any of you guys spent any time trying different areas inside the plenum for a MAP sensor reading? Being that we are all retrofit and no pressure sensor it has me wondering how much the location of the vac source changes the output to the MAP front to back of plenum.

Cheers,
Matt
shlammed is offline  
Old 08-04-2017, 11:39 AM
  #2  
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
18psi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,481
Default

Never had the need to do this. What exactly is the problem you're experiencing
18psi is offline  
Old 08-04-2017, 12:02 PM
  #3  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
shlammed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Kingston, Ontario
Posts: 2,910
Total Cats: 51
Default

Non-Miata related question. Just a general question. Im building an intake manifold for my personal car. (small photo below of concept)

Wondering where I can get the most stable yet proper representation of MAP or if its a non-concern. The sensor I'm using is a tMap though so I am pretty limited on where to put it (pretty much right behind the throttle body would be the best temperature reading)

Photo
Name:  tL9yx7vm.jpg
Views: 66
Size:  22.8 KB
shlammed is offline  
Old 08-04-2017, 12:04 PM
  #4  
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
18psi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,481
Default

The OEM map sensor in these cars is plumbed after tb but before runners
18psi is offline  
Old 08-04-2017, 03:59 PM
  #5  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
shlammed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Kingston, Ontario
Posts: 2,910
Total Cats: 51
Default

This engine did not have a MAP
shlammed is offline  
Old 08-04-2017, 04:19 PM
  #6  
Elite Member
 
z31maniac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: OKC, OK
Posts: 3,693
Total Cats: 222
Default

Looks similar to the way alot of custom BMW guys build manifolds.

I'd be more concerned about equal flow to all runners, years ago on R3V someone was building proto's like this, and his simulation software was showing it hard to get a good balance.
z31maniac is offline  
Old 08-04-2017, 06:38 PM
  #7  
Art
Junior Member
 
Art's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 369
Total Cats: -251
Default

.

Last edited by Art; 06-11-2018 at 05:52 PM.
Art is offline  
Old 08-08-2017, 11:01 AM
  #8  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
shlammed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Kingston, Ontario
Posts: 2,910
Total Cats: 51
Default

Originally Posted by Art
Honda but also right behind the TB:

Edit: Check your plenum volume on the last runner near the firewall it may be way too small?
The pipe half was just sitting on the bottom, not how it will look in finished trim.
shlammed is offline  
Old 08-08-2017, 12:38 PM
  #9  
Elite Member
iTrader: (4)
 
psyber_0ptix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 4,648
Total Cats: 544
Default

If it's worth anything to you, I ran an external AEM Map sensor to a small port behind the throttle body, before the runners with nipples that looked like they'd normally be purposed to the FPR or Cruise Control. This is on a square top. As I recall, it's around the same area that the Megasquirt manuals would recommend running a loooooooong skinny line to.
psyber_0ptix is offline  




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:17 AM.