Notices
DIY Turbo Discussion greddy on a 1.8? homebrew kit?

my 2871r dyno vs the turbonetics shitter

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 20, 2009 | 11:28 PM
  #1  
TURNS101's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 715
Total Cats: 5
Default my 2871r dyno vs the turbonetics *******

So the 2871 is at 20psi also. It wasnt tuned long though. Timing wasnt changed from the S60. Just adjusted AF so it would be safe. I believe there is alot of room for timing and much better improvement.
Attached Thumbnails my 2871r dyno vs the turbonetics shitter-t3-s60-stage-1.jpg   my 2871r dyno vs the turbonetics shitter-315hp.jpg   my 2871r dyno vs the turbonetics shitter-315hp-boost.jpg  
Old Oct 20, 2009 | 11:33 PM
  #2  
SolarYellow510's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 349
Total Cats: -2
Default

Significantly faster spool.
+40 lb-ft
+30 hp

How is that other company still in business?
Old Oct 20, 2009 | 11:35 PM
  #3  
jtothawhat's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,376
Total Cats: 4
From: Chicagoland
Default

Great gains, was your previous turbo DBB?
Old Oct 21, 2009 | 12:43 AM
  #4  
TURNS101's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 715
Total Cats: 5
Default

Originally Posted by SolarYellow510
Significantly faster spool.
+40 lb-ft
+30 hp

How is that other company still in business?
I am actually down in power. The s60 was on a mustang, the 2871 is on a dyno pack. The car feels significantly less powerful.
It does appear to spool better, but def alot less *****.
Originally Posted by jtothawhat
Great gains, was your previous turbo DBB?
The previous turbo was the Turbonetics bb. Its not a DBB and that company is full of lying ********.

Anyway. I think the 2871 has alot of room for improvement. I am going to leave it at the dyno for a while to get it dialed in..

I will post the difference between now and then as soon as I have it.
Old Oct 21, 2009 | 01:26 AM
  #5  
Hi Im Simon's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 303
Total Cats: 0
From: Temple City, Ca
Default

may i ask what's your build on your engine. too lazy to search. LOL

that's the turbo i'm going to put on soon hopefully
Old Oct 21, 2009 | 11:39 AM
  #6  
dc2696's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,202
Total Cats: 21
From: Edmonton Ab, Canada
Default

The 2871 .64a/r feels to small on my car. If I had the choice again I would have sprung for a 3076. I'm on a built motor aswell.
Old Oct 21, 2009 | 11:57 AM
  #7  
fmowry's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,907
Total Cats: 6
From: Severn, MD
Default

Wow RRE is still around? I remember them back from my DSM days.
Old Oct 21, 2009 | 12:00 PM
  #8  
hustler's Avatar
Tour de Franzia
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 29,085
Total Cats: 375
From: Republic of Dallas
Default

damn, I bet that car scoots.
Old Oct 21, 2009 | 12:02 PM
  #9  
Ben's Avatar
Ben
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,659
Total Cats: 134
From: atlanta-ish
Default

Hmm. Kind of looks like you wanted a 3071.
__________________
Chief of Floor Sweeping, DIYAutoTune.com & AMP EFI
Crew Chief, Car Owner & Least Valuable Driver, HongNorrthRacing

91 Turbo | 10AE Turbo | 01 Track Rat | #323 Mazda Champcar

Originally Posted by concealer404
Buy an MSPNP Pro, you'll feel better.
Old Oct 21, 2009 | 12:19 PM
  #10  
neogenesis2004's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,413
Total Cats: 20
Default

I love how the t3s60 womps the 2871. I can't wait to dyno my shizzle on the NE Dyno Day.
Old Oct 21, 2009 | 12:26 PM
  #11  
magnamx-5's Avatar
:(
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 8,255
Total Cats: 4
From: nowhere
Default

hmm i think once you get the timming sorted it will be atleast as good if not better. still very respectable and workable in getting sideways imo
Old Oct 21, 2009 | 12:32 PM
  #12  
Savington's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,106
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Default

Get the timing sorted out. What A/R did you go with?
Old Oct 21, 2009 | 12:39 PM
  #13  
fmowry's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,907
Total Cats: 6
From: Severn, MD
Default

2871 has 3 different compressor trims too. Lot of flavors in trims and A/R combos.
Old Oct 21, 2009 | 12:41 PM
  #14  
Savington's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,106
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Default

If he got the turbo he was talking about from the other thread, it's the 52 trim compressor. He was talking about doing a very small A/R to aid spool, which would obviously hurt top end.
Old Oct 21, 2009 | 05:53 PM
  #15  
TURNS101's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 715
Total Cats: 5
Default

I dont have the a/rs on hand.
This is the .64 housing.

Once the timing is sorted I think it will be much better.

this is the turbo I have. The very generic model most have.
TurboByGarrett.com - Catalog

Again, we will sort the timing and see what happens. I am surprised i am at the same boost. I expected to be running it lower. i am sure the timing is why. I would like to see 350-360 whp and ftlbs on this dyno pack thingy.

RRE is still rocking it out. They had the bay full of time attack car, road race, and ralley cars. I was the 5th person on the dyno that day..

More to come. car should be on the dyno next week..
Old Oct 21, 2009 | 06:17 PM
  #16  
Loki047's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 4,143
Total Cats: -5
From: Chicago
Default

Its nice to see what they turbos can do.
Old Oct 22, 2009 | 11:06 AM
  #17  
sixshooter's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 22,204
Total Cats: 3,560
From: Tampa, Florida
Default

What gear was your car in when pulling on the Dynapack? It says you have a final drive ratio during the pull of 6.033 to 1. If you were in fourth, which is probable, that would mean that your tq and hp numbers are artificially high (which always makes a happy customer but doesn't tell the truth). The dyno operator knows this and is giving you BS numbers to make you feel good. That is why it feels slower than the numbers indicate. The numbers are just incorrect. It is a very common trick...happens often...

Good luck.
Old Oct 22, 2009 | 11:18 AM
  #18  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

Final drive ratio is irrelevant as Dyno is calibrated to Hub speed and engine rpm. The software should self calibrate, unless they didn't set it up properly.
Old Oct 22, 2009 | 04:47 PM
  #19  
TURNS101's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 715
Total Cats: 5
Default

I am not sure what gear it was in.
I am quite sure this tuner and the shop would not **** around with fluffing numbers. They know it wont fly with me and or my engine builder. The tuner is also an honest guy.

I am down on power simply because the 2871 numbers are on a wimpy dyno, not a mustang.
The HP is about what the mustang said and about TQ is about 20ftlbs less.

So the lower tq and the non mustang dyno all = less power. It wasnt a slouch, it just didnt have the ***** I did before. This is the one track I need every amount of power i could get..

Originally Posted by sixshooter
What gear was your car in when pulling on the Dynapack? It says you have a final drive ratio during the pull of 6.033 to 1. If you were in fourth, which is probable, that would mean that your tq and hp numbers are artificially high (which always makes a happy customer but doesn't tell the truth). The dyno operator knows this and is giving you BS numbers to make you feel good. That is why it feels slower than the numbers indicate. The numbers are just incorrect. It is a very common trick...happens often...

Good luck.
Originally Posted by Braineack
Final drive ratio is irrelevant as Dyno is calibrated to Hub speed and engine rpm. The software should self calibrate, unless they didn't set it up properly.
I believe this was happening..
Old Oct 22, 2009 | 04:53 PM
  #20  
Savington's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,106
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Default

Originally Posted by Braineack
Final drive ratio is irrelevant as Dyno is calibrated to Hub speed and engine rpm. The software should self calibrate, unless they didn't set it up properly.
Not on a Dynapack. They do it correctly, by inputting the final drive and then using the 1:1 gear.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:03 PM.