Notices
DIY Turbo Discussion greddy on a 1.8? homebrew kit?

Possible crankcase pressure problems???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 22, 2019 | 09:29 AM
  #1  
xmacmiatax's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 108
Total Cats: -19
Default Possible crankcase pressure problems???

Hi all. I’ve Recently had a bottom end built of a 1.6 with cp pistons and some rods. New rings bearings etc. having a problem where turbos are leaking oil from the compressor side. Had a precision 5557 on there at first and it was leaking bad. Rebuilt it. Same thing happens. Bought a cheap cx racing turbo. And it’s still leaking from the compressor side. Drain and feed lines are completely vertical. Stock Pcv system was replaced with a catch can. Also no oil in the exhaust port of the head. That’s my reason for thinking crankcase pressure is to high. And not allowing oil to drain properly. I’ve attached a picture to sort of be able to see catch can setup. -10an fittings welded on the front right side and rear left side.I can take a better one after work. Any insight would be appreciated. Thank you.
Old Jul 22, 2019 | 09:33 AM
  #2  
cpierr03's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 288
Total Cats: 34
Default

Restrictor on oil feed line? Are you sourcing oil feed from the block?
Old Jul 22, 2019 | 09:41 AM
  #3  
xmacmiatax's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 108
Total Cats: -19
Default

Originally Posted by cpierr03
Restrictor on oil feed line? Are you sourcing oil feed from the block?
Sourcing from the block and restrictor on the precision was 30 thousands and the cx turbo is slightly bigger.
Old Jul 22, 2019 | 12:21 PM
  #4  
sixshooter's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 22,204
Total Cats: 3,560
From: Tampa, Florida
Default

Is the catch can vented to atmosphere?
Old Jul 22, 2019 | 02:07 PM
  #5  
xmacmiatax's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 108
Total Cats: -19
Default

Originally Posted by sixshooter
Is the catch can vented to atmosphere?
Catch can is not vented. But I did remove hoses from the valve cover. And it still did it but it could’ve been residual build up
Old Jul 22, 2019 | 02:24 PM
  #6  
matrussell122's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,861
Total Cats: 517
From: Seattle
Default

Step 1 vent catch can
Old Jul 22, 2019 | 02:28 PM
  #7  
xmacmiatax's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 108
Total Cats: -19
Default

Originally Posted by matrussell122
Step 1 vent catch can
Even at just idle it does it. would not having a vented setup make that much of a difference. The car hasn’t seen any rpms above 3000 yet. No boost. Hasn’t even been driven. Been trying to figure this problem out for the last month. Finallly figured I’d just ask here and see if anybody knew.
Old Jul 22, 2019 | 03:16 PM
  #8  
sixshooter's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 22,204
Total Cats: 3,560
From: Tampa, Florida
Default

If both hoses go to a closed container, that's exactly the same as capping off both hoses at the valve cover.

Please tell me you understand this.
Old Jul 22, 2019 | 03:46 PM
  #9  
matrussell122's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,861
Total Cats: 517
From: Seattle
Default

Six i understand this completely is a basic concept
Old Jul 22, 2019 | 05:45 PM
  #10  
sixshooter's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 22,204
Total Cats: 3,560
From: Tampa, Florida
Default

Originally Posted by matrussell122
Six i understand this completely is a basic concept
You get it and I get it but I'm not sure about xmac.
Old Jul 23, 2019 | 06:41 AM
  #11  
Arca_ex's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,634
Total Cats: 431
From: Chandler, AZ
Default

So to sum this up you capped off the only routes for crankcase pressure to escape and now you don't know why you have excessive crankcase pressure?

Umm...
Old Jul 23, 2019 | 12:54 PM
  #12  
xmacmiatax's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 108
Total Cats: -19
Default

Na I understand I’ve seen setups similar to this before with no breathers that have worked before. Think I’m gonna do a dual setup and put a breather on each. Hopefully that works.
Old Jul 23, 2019 | 01:13 PM
  #13  
HowPrayGame's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 412
Total Cats: 28
From: Tampa FL
Default

Originally Posted by xmacmiatax
I’ve seen setups similar to this before with no breathers that have worked before.


Old Jul 23, 2019 | 01:14 PM
  #14  
matrussell122's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,861
Total Cats: 517
From: Seattle
Default

Originally Posted by xmacmiatax
Na I understand I’ve seen setups similar to this before with no breathers that have worked before. Think I’m gonna do a dual setup and put a breather on each. Hopefully that works.
No you havent seen sealed setups that have worked before.

This is a simple concept. Cap off vent on the pcv side. Run big line from exhaust side into a VENTED can. Drill out the passage in the valve cover and add copper scrubbers. Then be done with it.
Old Jul 23, 2019 | 01:20 PM
  #15  
sixshooter's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 22,204
Total Cats: 3,560
From: Tampa, Florida
Default

Or just run both sides to a vented can.

The secret is not a secret. It's the venting part. Engines need venting. Even Briggs & Stratton have venting. You have never seen an engine without venting. Ever. You might not have understood where it was venting, but it was venting.
Old Jul 23, 2019 | 01:28 PM
  #16  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

Originally Posted by xmacmiatax
Na I understand I’ve seen setups similar to this before with no breathers that have worked before. Think I’m gonna do a dual setup and put a breather on each. Hopefully that works.
there's 2 options:
1) sealed with 2 ports, one of them to a vacuum source
2) vented

das it
Old Jul 23, 2019 | 01:30 PM
  #17  
xmacmiatax's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 108
Total Cats: -19
Default

Alright I’ll try that thanks
Old Jul 23, 2019 | 09:50 PM
  #18  
stevos555's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 501
Total Cats: -8
From: Chicago
Default

The OEM standard for dual catch can is back to the vacuum source, while the PCV and IM takes it to non vented catch can

http://www.radiumauto.com/Catch-Can-...ata-P1180.aspx
Old Jul 24, 2019 | 02:15 AM
  #19  
Arca_ex's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,634
Total Cats: 431
From: Chandler, AZ
Default

Originally Posted by xmacmiatax
Na I understand I’ve seen setups similar to this before with no breathers that have worked before. Think I’m gonna do a dual setup and put a breather on each. Hopefully that works.
Those setups that you've seen without a breather filter have an additional line that is routed to the intake piping before the turbo, and it dumps the crank case pressure there. Nobody runs theirs set up the way you have it, because it doesn't work.
Old Jul 24, 2019 | 01:37 PM
  #20  
Der_Idiot's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,489
Total Cats: 29
From: Saint Paul, MN
Default

This is my dual catch can setup

Passenger side: PCV bung tapped for hose fitting (prevents weeping leak) -> Catch can -> Hose to PCV valve -> Another hose to Intake port from PCV -- This puts the PCV inline between the catch can and the intake manifold. Prevents pressurizing the catch can and keeps a large ID for the vacuum hose to slow airflow
Driver side: Valve cover port --> Catch Can -> Port on filter @ turbo





All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:06 AM.