Notices
DIY Turbo Discussion greddy on a 1.8? homebrew kit?

Question about pipeing size for a t25

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 31, 2007 | 09:42 PM
  #1  
cardriverx's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,573
Total Cats: 12
From: Hermosa Beach, CA
Default Question about pipeing size for a t25

the compressor outlet has an outter diameter of 2 inches. Does that mean I must use 2 inch pipe? What if I used 2.25 inch pipe? would that reduce spool time? thanks.
Old May 31, 2007 | 10:08 PM
  #2  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

nope not one bit

you're going to want to make it 2.5" by the time you get to the TB....typically we do 2" in the intercooler and 2.5" out.
Old May 31, 2007 | 10:23 PM
  #3  
cjernigan's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 8,091
Total Cats: 7
From: Atlanta, GA
Default

Whatever piping sizes you decide to use you have the option of using transition couplers or you can weld transitions on the pipes themselves.
Old May 31, 2007 | 10:28 PM
  #4  
cardriverx's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,573
Total Cats: 12
From: Hermosa Beach, CA
Default

ok, thanks! you guys are great!
Old May 31, 2007 | 11:02 PM
  #5  
nester's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 811
Total Cats: 0
From: Houston, TX
Default

I run 2" from compressor to throttle body.. no problems, car spins through first and second..
Old Jun 1, 2007 | 12:03 AM
  #6  
Savington's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,106
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Default

The smaller the better, right? Ideally you want the pipes to have as little volume as possible so they take the least amount of time to fill up, correct?

For instance, if you've got an IC with 2.5" inlet/outlet, it'd be best to run 2" to a transition coupler, then out the other side to another transition coupler, up to the TB to a 90° transition coupler. Difficult, but ideal, right?
Old Jun 1, 2007 | 12:07 AM
  #7  
Atlanta93LE's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,195
Total Cats: 1
From: Marietta, GA
Default

Seriously, I feel that ideal is whatever fits the best. For the power levels we're aiming for, going to big pipes doesn't add much benefit, and the "throttled volume" decrease in small pipes is not very important with a turbo.
Old Jun 1, 2007 | 08:39 AM
  #8  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

Originally Posted by Savington
The smaller the better, right? Ideally you want the pipes to have as little volume as possible so they take the least amount of time to fill up, correct?
you could use 4" piping and the volume will fill up just as fast...
Old Jun 1, 2007 | 03:05 PM
  #9  
Savington's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,106
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Default

What? 2" pipes will fill faster than 4" pipes.
Old Jun 1, 2007 | 03:18 PM
  #10  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

The flow of CFM relative to the volume of the intercooler, pipes and distance involved in whatever sort of plumbing you utilize...have virtually zero influence.

yeah they will fill faster, but will you be able to measure/feel the difference?

Last edited by Braineack; Jun 4, 2007 at 08:58 AM.
Old Jun 3, 2007 | 09:21 PM
  #11  
mazda/nissan's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,075
Total Cats: 0
From: Lexington, SC
Default

AND.... 4" pipes would look kickass
Old Jun 3, 2007 | 09:48 PM
  #12  
Kelly's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,396
Total Cats: 0
From: Sammamish, Washington
Default

Only 4"??? You guys must drive girl cars.....:gay:

FWIW I use 2.5" plumbing on pretty much everything because thats what size the intercooler inlet and outlet are.
Old Jun 3, 2007 | 10:34 PM
  #13  
Al Hounos's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,168
Total Cats: 0
From: Knoxville
Default

use whatever fits best/is cheapest
Old Jun 4, 2007 | 01:58 AM
  #14  
kylelind's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 220
Total Cats: 0
From: Mountain View, CA
Default

At 200bhp 2.0" puts you at about mach .27 in the pipe and 2.5" is at about .18. Corky Bell says that frictional losses get noticeable at about mach .4, so 2" would work good. He also says to resist the urge to go larger because the volume of the system is directly proportional to the time it takes for the boost pressure to get to the engine.

Time = (volume / flow rate) X 2
Old Jun 4, 2007 | 08:52 AM
  #15  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

Now your getting crossed with Supercharger talk:

Originally Posted by Corky Bell
The throttled volume doesn't change with the turbo. Throttle stays in the original place.

I see no change in the throttle response regardless of intake tract. Isn't throttle response sort of defined as the engine's response to a throttle position change? Turbo/no turbo.... I don't see how it affects it.

Lag is a different deal. Would the large volume intake path from turbo to throttle affect the lag? Maybe, if the volume is as big as my office.

Try this: estimate the volume from turbo to throttle, estimate the cfm in the system when typically nailing the throttle, then calc the air velocity in the tube, then calc the time the air will spend in the tube. The results are kinda cool. And slightly surprising.

Another thought: Use an improper anti-surge valve (bypass valve) and the turbo will keep 3 or 4 psi packed into the throttle inlet tube all the time. With some boost already there, the throttle need only let it in. Not much for lag.
I think this post clearly states what I'm saying.
Old Jun 4, 2007 | 03:52 PM
  #16  
samnavy's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 6,463
Total Cats: 327
From: VaBch, VA
Default

This discussion comes around every other month or so. If I remember correctly, Corky did expiriments and found for power levels in the sub-300whp range, there was ZERO difference between around 1.75"-4" piping. I think he even talks about this in Maximum Boost.

Keep it a uniform size, make the routing as straight as possible, and use a properly sized IC.

My 2" pipes were super easy to route.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Full_Tilt_Boogie
Build Threads
84
Apr 12, 2021 04:21 PM
emilio700
Wheels and Tires
151
Jun 2, 2017 02:36 PM
Corky Bell
Prefabbed Turbo Kits
18
Nov 22, 2016 09:01 PM
Quinn
Cars for sale/trade
6
Oct 23, 2016 07:58 AM
Trent
WTB
2
Oct 1, 2015 12:15 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:59 PM.