DIY Turbo Discussion greddy on a 1.8? homebrew kit?

saving Stock rods by keeping peak torque low ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-06-2018, 07:27 PM
  #41  
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
k24madness's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: San Rafael, CA
Posts: 1,421
Total Cats: 95
Default

Originally Posted by Savington
There is no time component when it comes to a force applied to a body, though. The force is applied, and the body can withstand it, or the body can't.
I will respectfully challenge that statement.

In my humble opinion time is a factor up to a point. In a narrower period of time you have elastic deflection that rebounds. During a longer period of time you are more likely to bend something beyond its elasticity and introduce a perminate bend.

The million dollar question is how closely the two are to one another. In all likelihood the delta is so minor as to make the entire concept irrelevant.

Last edited by k24madness; 12-06-2018 at 09:04 PM.
k24madness is offline  
Old 12-06-2018, 07:39 PM
  #42  
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Savington's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,099
Default

Which engineering equation describing the yield strength of a structure includes time as a variable?
Savington is offline  
Old 12-06-2018, 07:45 PM
  #43  
Elite Member
 
nitrodann's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Newcastle, Australia
Posts: 2,826
Total Cats: 67
Default

A better question might be, what assumptions are made in those equations, and are they only useful for static loads.

Dann

Last edited by nitrodann; 12-06-2018 at 07:58 PM.
nitrodann is offline  
Old 12-06-2018, 08:13 PM
  #44  
Retired Mech Design Engr
iTrader: (3)
 
DNMakinson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Seneca, SC
Posts: 5,009
Total Cats: 856
Default

The best clause I have seen in this is from Savington... "if you want to".. in this statement: "Keep the timing soft and you can probably make 220wtq at 3000rpm on a stock motor if you want to."

Because as I have thought about it more, there are few times, if any, where torque at such a low RPM has value. Even at the drag strip, I would plan to launch at higher RPM; and on the street, I cannot hook that much torque in first gear, and all other gears are then above 4-5 K if running up through them.

And in first gear, there is not enough time or load to spool the turbo before the engine is well past 3K.
DNMakinson is offline  
Old 12-06-2018, 08:14 PM
  #45  
Elite Member
 
nitrodann's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Newcastle, Australia
Posts: 2,826
Total Cats: 67
Default

A thought experiment:

Take a 3 foot long steel roundbar, 1/2" in diameter.

You stand it on its end and apply increasing mass to the top of the steel rod until you find the force required to fold the rod onto itself.

If you watched the rod fold on high speed you would see that the rod is being initially bent through its elastic deformation stage and quite a few milliseconds would pass before the rod reaches its plastic deformation stage.

Therefor if the load is applied for a lesser period of time than it takes to reach plastic deformation the rod will not permanently deform.

Assuming 8,000 rpm in a 4 stroke, and 20 crankshaft degrees of peak cylinder pressure the load is applied for less than 1 millisecond.


What do you all think? I have run this past a mechanical engineering phd (a friend) and a physics phd (my auntie) who agree.

Dann
nitrodann is offline  
Old 12-06-2018, 08:19 PM
  #46  
Tweaking Enginerd
iTrader: (2)
 
Ted75zcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 1,773
Total Cats: 354
Default

Originally Posted by DNMakinson
The best clause I have seen in this is from Savington... "if you want to".. in this statement: "Keep the timing soft and you can probably make 220wtq at 3000rpm on a stock motor if you want to."

Because as I have thought about it more, there are few times, if any, where torque at such a low RPM has value. Even at the drag strip, I would plan to launch at higher RPM; and on the street, I cannot hook that much torque in first gear, and all other gears are then above 4-5 K if running up through them.

And in first gear, there is not enough time or load to spool the turbo before the engine is well past 3K.
you might feel differently if you had low end torque Power everywhere, regardless of gear or rpm, is pretty nice on the street.
Ted75zcar is offline  
Old 12-06-2018, 08:38 PM
  #47  
Tweaking Enginerd
iTrader: (2)
 
Ted75zcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 1,773
Total Cats: 354
Default

Originally Posted by DNMakinson
Resurrection.

Conservative tune, stock engine, '99. Concern is rods, just like this thread.

Can I run 200- 210 Ft-Lbs torque safely as low as 3500 RPM, if the mini-turbo can make it? Right now I'm hitting it at about 4000, same as Karter74 did.
I ran 200-210 at 2500 on a stock 1.6 bottom end for 6 months without failure.
Ted75zcar is offline  
Old 12-06-2018, 08:43 PM
  #48  
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
borka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 1,552
Total Cats: 196
Default

Originally Posted by Ted75zcar
I ran 200-210 at 2500 on a stock 1.6 bottom end for 6 months without failure.
210tq at 2500 rpm? what turbo setup can achieve this on a 1.6L?

a gt2554r cant even do 210tq at 2500 rpm on a 1.8L vvt motor.
borka is offline  
Old 12-06-2018, 08:45 PM
  #49  
Tweaking Enginerd
iTrader: (2)
 
Ted75zcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 1,773
Total Cats: 354
Default

Gt2871 churbo + Autorotor OA2076 compound twin
Ted75zcar is offline  
Old 12-06-2018, 09:07 PM
  #50  
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
borka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 1,552
Total Cats: 196
Default

Originally Posted by Ted75zcar
Gt2871 churbo + Autorotor OA2076 compound twin
impressive.

sup with the neg cats? am i expected to know each MT.net members wild setups??

chill out people, it was just a question.
borka is offline  
Old 12-07-2018, 12:43 AM
  #51  
Junior Member
 
Spaceman Spiff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 356
Total Cats: 93
Default

Originally Posted by Savington
Which engineering equation describing the yield strength of a structure includes time as a variable?
Strain-rate dependent (i.e. time dependent) behavior is a pretty big research field in solid mechanics. I'd imagine the time scales you see in engine combustion are small enough to make this relevant, but I'm definitely not informed enough to say for certain,



Spaceman Spiff is offline  
Old 12-07-2018, 12:46 AM
  #52  
Elite Member
 
nitrodann's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Newcastle, Australia
Posts: 2,826
Total Cats: 67
Default

This is what I have been referring to, thankyou for sharing your knowledge and giving me some terms to google.

Dann
nitrodann is offline  
Old 12-07-2018, 01:33 AM
  #53  
afm
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
afm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Berkeley, CA
Posts: 981
Total Cats: 508
Default

Originally Posted by Savington
Which engineering equation describing the yield strength of a structure includes time as a variable?
The most literal form of "breaking as a function of time at applied load" is creep.

Creep describes plastic deformation below yield stress as a function of time. So the more general question of "what stress will this part meaningfully deform at" can include time as a variable, even if it's not strictly called the yield stress. But I agree that this is not relevant to this discussion, since a con rod run at 3000rpm for 1 minute and a con rod run at 7000rpm for 1 minute spend the exact same amount of time in compression.
afm is offline  
Old 12-07-2018, 01:38 AM
  #54  
Elite Member
 
codrus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Santa Clara, CA
Posts: 5,165
Total Cats: 855
Default

FWIW, I ran 240-ish rwhp (dynojet) for 50K+ miles on a totally stock 99 motor, and when I took it apart to build it (because I wanted to make more), the rods were straight as an arrow. That motor never ran boost with less than 95 octane though.

--Ian
codrus is offline  
Old 12-07-2018, 01:58 AM
  #55  
Elite Member
 
nitrodann's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Newcastle, Australia
Posts: 2,826
Total Cats: 67
Default

Originally Posted by afm
a con rod run at 3000rpm for 1 minute and a con rod run at 7000rpm for 1 minute spend the exact same amount of time in compression.

But each time force is applied it's applied for less time the higher the revs are, and therein lies the root of the question.
nitrodann is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Wowbagger the I.P.
ECUs and Tuning
10
10-09-2014 08:38 PM
EunosRoadster
General Miata Chat
12
11-23-2009 04:43 PM
Joe Perez
Engine Performance
33
06-23-2009 12:28 AM
Savington
General Miata Chat
40
05-24-2007 07:47 AM
leshok
DIY Turbo Discussion
2
09-26-2006 09:34 AM



Quick Reply: saving Stock rods by keeping peak torque low ?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:30 PM.