Notices
DIY Turbo Discussion greddy on a 1.8? homebrew kit?

V-band Housings for EFR Turbos

Old May 2, 2013 | 05:33 PM
  #21  
concealer404's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,917
Total Cats: 2,206
Default

Originally Posted by thenuge26
I wish.



Looks like they're gonna make me decide between IWG and V-band inlet. Or just run ALLOFIT all the time

Obviously EWG will be more difficult if I end up fabbing my own manifold, but v-bands will be easier to deal with...


Bro think of all the vbands you could have. Vband e'er'thang!


(i'm a massive ricer so this appeals to me.)
Old May 2, 2013 | 05:36 PM
  #22  
thenuge26's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,267
Total Cats: 239
From: Indianapolis
Default

That makes sense, simpler is better. And while v-band inlet is simpler than T25 flange, the IWG is simpler than an EWG (and the Borg ones are as good as an EWG).

I wonder if the v-band EWG housing is the same one Indy uses? Or that housing pictured might be an Indy one and they will also offer a v-band inlet IWG (doubtful but I can dream can't I?).
Old May 2, 2013 | 05:39 PM
  #23  
Savington's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,106
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Default

Originally Posted by thenuge26
(and the Borg ones are better than an EWG).
FTFY
Old May 2, 2013 | 05:47 PM
  #24  
viperormiata's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 6,110
Total Cats: 283
From: Key West
Default

WANT
Old May 2, 2013 | 06:48 PM
  #25  
Leafy's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 9,491
Total Cats: 105
From: NH
Default

Originally Posted by thenuge26
I wish.



Looks like they're gonna make me decide between IWG and V-band inlet. Or just run ALLOFIT all the time

Obviously EWG will be more difficult if I end up fabbing my own manifold, but v-bands will be easier to deal with...
Yeah I saw the undrilled boss for the wastegate pivot point and figured it was coming without it. But thinking about it more, that boss wouldnt be in that casting if they weren't going to drill a hole there for the IWG.
Old May 2, 2013 | 07:30 PM
  #26  
Savington's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,106
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Default

Originally Posted by Leafy
Yeah I saw the undrilled boss for the wastegate pivot point and figured it was coming without it. But thinking about it more, that boss wouldnt be in that casting if they weren't going to drill a hole there for the IWG.
What casting are you talking about? The little bump just after the inlet is likely so you can drill/tap for EGT.
Old May 3, 2013 | 09:03 AM
  #27  
Leafy's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 9,491
Total Cats: 105
From: NH
Default

Originally Posted by Savington
What casting are you talking about? The little bump just after the inlet is likely so you can drill/tap for EGT.
The one that was on the other side that we cant see and I had the housing flipped around in my head.
Old May 3, 2013 | 09:47 AM
  #28  
shuiend's Avatar
mkturbo.com
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 15,235
Total Cats: 1,700
From: Charleston SC
Default

I am really hoping that the inlet for the turbine from the manifold is the same size of what Tial uses on their V-Band housing. If I could swap back and forth between the EFR and my GT2871 I would be very happy. I also would like the EFR to have the internal wastegate along with the V-Bands.
Old May 3, 2013 | 09:56 AM
  #29  
thenuge26's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,267
Total Cats: 239
From: Indianapolis
Default

The IWG on the EFRs makes the turbine-to-downpipe part of the housing really long, which makes fitment an issue. But from the looks of the v-band housing, you might be able to just swap it straight in where your 2871 was. Except I don't remember if you are EWG or not...
Old May 3, 2013 | 10:28 AM
  #30  
shuiend's Avatar
mkturbo.com
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 15,235
Total Cats: 1,700
From: Charleston SC
Default

Originally Posted by thenuge26
The IWG on the EFRs makes the turbine-to-downpipe part of the housing really long, which makes fitment an issue. But from the looks of the v-band housing, you might be able to just swap it straight in where your 2871 was. Except I don't remember if you are EWG or not...
I am EWG, but that does not mean I can not build a cap for that outlet. I know the stock exhaust housing is rather long on EFR with IWG, I have a lowmount manifold so I really should not have any issues fitting that. I also do not have any problems with making a new downpipe and just switching those. Really I just want to stay away from having to build a new manifold just for the EFR. Back to back testing with just a change of the turbo and downpipe would be very nice.
Old May 3, 2013 | 10:36 AM
  #31  
thenuge26's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,267
Total Cats: 239
From: Indianapolis
Default

Right but if you don't mind keeping your EWG, I'm thinking that with that EFR v-band housing you could just do a straight swap with your GT2871 from the looks of it. I'm not sure what the coldside looks like compared to the Garrett, you might have to modify the IC piping.

Just swap it out with no mods at all. Back to back testing by removing a couple of v-bands.
Old May 3, 2013 | 12:25 PM
  #32  
StarletRick's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 113
Total Cats: 4
From: Essex, UK
Default

after some more research.




they are doing both. wallop. the housing looks to be in similar proportion to the t25 flange, so wont be interchangable with a tial/garrett unit without the DP going too.
Attached Thumbnails V-band Housings for EFR Turbos-317189_10151094874946500_2046134439_n.jpg  
Old May 3, 2013 | 12:26 PM
  #33  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

Lars, that would be awesome, and get us a really good look at how the two stack up


Originally Posted by StarletRick
after some more research.



wallop.
WIN!!
Old May 3, 2013 | 12:30 PM
  #34  
thenuge26's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,267
Total Cats: 239
From: Indianapolis
Default

Originally Posted by StarletRick
after some more research.

they are doing both. wallop.
Attached Thumbnails V-band Housings for EFR Turbos-animation3.gif  
Old May 3, 2013 | 12:31 PM
  #35  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

Wonder how much more these suckers will cost
Old May 3, 2013 | 12:32 PM
  #36  
StarletRick's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 113
Total Cats: 4
From: Essex, UK
Default

yup! I cant tell you how happy this makes me. Lets just hope they are investment cast like the photos. I've heard too many bad stories of EFRs turning up with sand cast housings that look like a piece of ****.
Old May 3, 2013 | 01:19 PM
  #37  
Savington's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,106
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Default

Originally Posted by StarletRick
yup! I cant tell you how happy this makes me. Lets just hope they are investment cast like the photos. I've heard too many bad stories of EFRs turning up with sand cast housings that look like a piece of ****.
The sand cast housings are a temporary solution because the early investment housings were failing QC. The final housings for all of the turbos will be investment cast.
Old May 3, 2013 | 02:08 PM
  #38  
shuiend's Avatar
mkturbo.com
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 15,235
Total Cats: 1,700
From: Charleston SC
Default

Originally Posted by thenuge26
Right but if you don't mind keeping your EWG, I'm thinking that with that EFR v-band housing you could just do a straight swap with your GT2871 from the looks of it. I'm not sure what the coldside looks like compared to the Garrett, you might have to modify the IC piping.

Just swap it out with no mods at all. Back to back testing by removing a couple of v-bands.
My EWG tends to creep a bit on higher RPM's. Also from what I have read the internal gate on the EFR is amazing and better then an ewg. So if I go with an EFR for testing I would like the best of the best.

Also the making of a downpipe that does not need the EWG dump tube would be easier for me.

Originally Posted by 18psi
Lars, that would be awesome, and get us a really good look at how the two stack up
I think that my GT2871 will have a slightly better top end the smaller EFR, but I think that the EFR will have a better mid range. Now if I go with the slightly bigger one that Soviet is now rocking I think the top ends would be very similar, with the EFR having a better mid range. If I win the lotto or find me a sugar momma I would love to also throw a GTX of similar size on to test that also.
Old May 3, 2013 | 08:29 PM
  #39  
MazDilla's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 394
Total Cats: 6
From: Overland Park, KS
Default

Originally Posted by StarletRick
after some more research.



Let the era of low maintenance aftermarket turbocharging begin! Tune and forget.
Old May 3, 2013 | 08:33 PM
  #40  
TurboTim's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 7,035
Total Cats: 425
From: Chesterfield, NJ
Default

Yeah cause those FM kits are a royal PITA, definitely not user friendly.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:36 PM.