Notices
DIY Turbo Discussion greddy on a 1.8? homebrew kit?

Who is NOT running a BOV?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 19, 2010 | 06:20 PM
  #21  
AutoFreak57's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 587
Total Cats: 99
From: Louisville, KY
Default

Originally Posted by sixshooter
Agreed, but that was back when mullets and Camaros ruled the earth.
They don't still rule the earth?!?! Guess I need to cut my hair then :(
Old May 19, 2010 | 07:13 PM
  #22  
Sparetire's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,642
Total Cats: 36
From: Colorado
Default

[QUOTE=ScottFW;575333]Exactly. The rally guys do without BOVs because they want to eliminate lag as much as possible for better throttle modulation, and retaining pressure in the intake plumbing helps with that. QUOTE]

Srt of shooting myself down, but a BOV actually improves throttle response. Wihtout it you have a situation with rapid decleration of the compressor wheel when the throttle shuts, which requires the turbo to spin back up more than if a BOv was present. One of those weird counter-intuitive things.
Old May 19, 2010 | 07:14 PM
  #23  
Sparetire's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,642
Total Cats: 36
From: Colorado
Default

So my comp just did some pretty weird ****. Sorry for the newbish messed up posting. Wont let me delete.
Old May 19, 2010 | 11:06 PM
  #24  
na8psi's Avatar
I'm Miserable!
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 464
Total Cats: 0
From: North Carolina
Default

Not agreeing with the argument in any way of supporting NOT running a BOV, but I do know this, Chrysler Conquest TSi/Mitsubishi Starion's did not run BOVs. Yet, this was a time when engine design overall doesn't seem to be very well thought out with those vehicles, anybody who has seen the fueling system knows what I'm talking about.
Old May 19, 2010 | 11:37 PM
  #25  
chpmnsws6's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,712
Total Cats: 25
From: Springfield IL
Default

Originally Posted by na8psi
Not agreeing with the argument in any way of supporting NOT running a BOV, but I do know this, Chrysler Conquest TSi/Mitsubishi Starion's did not run BOVs. Yet, this was a time when engine design overall doesn't seem to be very well thought out with those vehicles, anybody who has seen the fueling system knows what I'm talking about.
The only way those are worth anything is when you stuff a 4G down its throat.


We don't have one on our 376rwhp monster
Old May 19, 2010 | 11:51 PM
  #26  
na8psi's Avatar
I'm Miserable!
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 464
Total Cats: 0
From: North Carolina
Default

Originally Posted by chpmnsws6
The only way those are worth anything is when you stuff a 4G down its throat.


We don't have one on our 376rwhp monster
Lol I have a good friend I grew up with that had a really nice/restored conquest with a ported big 16G on 15psi. His first engine went on him, he bought a new one with warranty from Jasper, ended up going through 6 of them. All were oil pump failures.
Old May 21, 2010 | 05:38 PM
  #27  
gnx7's Avatar
Newb
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 24
Total Cats: 0
From: San Francisco
Default

Actually the Buick Grand National 3.8i turbo '84-87 didn't come with a BOV... and their turbos lasted well beyond 100K miles. They were automatic transmissions so maybe they were a bit softer on them....

Get a BOV from an Audi, Mitsu Evo, Subaru WRX or other factory turbo'd car and install one for next to nothing. They are there for a reason.
Old May 21, 2010 | 07:33 PM
  #28  
matthewdesigns's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,648
Total Cats: 55
From: WNC
Default

I'd suggest a 1st gen DSM BOV as another cheap, reliable one. Nice and tight up to about 15-16psi, then can be modified to hold up to the lower 20's. You can find one in good shape for $30-40.
Old May 22, 2010 | 01:39 AM
  #29  
1slowna's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 328
Total Cats: 4
From: Palm Harbor FL
Default

Funny this subject would come up because i was talking to one of the guys from precision turbo and they told me if i have a turbo with an antisurge cover and a manual gear box a bov is good for nothing. however he said with an auto you gotta have one did t really get a chance to ask why autos needed em and manual dont but he said with an antisurge cover theres absolutely no need for a bov.
Old May 23, 2010 | 01:33 PM
  #30  
Sparetire's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,642
Total Cats: 36
From: Colorado
Default

That makes no sense to me. Autos dont need a BOV near as much as MTs do, the throttle plate does'nt close in hard shifting.
Old May 23, 2010 | 02:35 PM
  #31  
Full_Tilt_Boogie's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 5,155
Total Cats: 409
From: Jacksonville, FL
Default

Im going to recirculate my BOV to my *******
Old May 23, 2010 | 03:06 PM
  #32  
Savington's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,106
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Default

Originally Posted by TURNS101
Mullets still rule.

Many people I drive with dont run BOV either. They said the effect is minimal and worth it not having to worry about one more thing..

I have a big *** Tial BOV
This is my favorite logic in the whole entire world. "I'm not going to install something that improves reliability because it's one more thing to worry about"

Brb guyz im gonna go un-install my wideband because it's just one more thing to worry about
Old May 24, 2010 | 12:35 PM
  #33  
saedrin's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 248
Total Cats: 0
From: Chicago, IL
Default

Yeah, like the RX7 guys give a crap about their turbo lifespan when they wake up every morning praying for another day of functional apex seals.
Old May 24, 2010 | 12:38 PM
  #34  
falcon's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,499
Total Cats: 16
Default

I don't run on on the Miata and never ran one on my FD or Skyline.

And I track all of them. No extra shaft play has ever really come about from it either.
Old May 24, 2010 | 12:48 PM
  #35  
Full_Tilt_Boogie's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 5,155
Total Cats: 409
From: Jacksonville, FL
Default

Originally Posted by saedrin
Yeah, like the RX7 guys give a crap about their turbo lifespan when they wake up every morning praying for another day of functional apex seals.
Spoken out of true ignorance.
Old May 25, 2010 | 12:20 PM
  #36  
saedrin's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 248
Total Cats: 0
From: Chicago, IL
Default

Originally Posted by Full_Tilt_Boogie
Spoken out of true ignorance.
It's a joke. Relax.
Old May 25, 2010 | 01:06 PM
  #37  
Cococarbine3's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 601
Total Cats: 0
From: Batavia, IL
Default

http://www.honda-tech.com/showthread.php?t=2648460
Old May 25, 2010 | 02:09 PM
  #38  
hustler's Avatar
Tour de Franzia
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 29,085
Total Cats: 375
From: Republic of Dallas
Default

Originally Posted by Full_Tilt_Boogie
Im going to recirculate my BOV to my *******
What about that 80yar old boy's mouth?
Originally Posted by 1slowna
Funny this subject would come up because i was talking to one of the guys from precision turbo and they told me if i have a turbo with an antisurge cover and a manual gear box a bov is good for nothing. however he said with an auto you gotta have one did t really get a chance to ask why autos needed em and manual dont but he said with an antisurge cover theres absolutely no need for a bov.
Did they also tell you about several designs they're copying over from TiAL? I don't know WTF they are thinking but the anti-surge housing is another design they stole from TiAL.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Full_Tilt_Boogie
Build Threads
84
Apr 12, 2021 04:21 PM
StratoBlue1109
Miata parts for sale/trade
21
Sep 30, 2018 01:09 PM
90 Turbo
MEGAsquirt
19
Oct 19, 2015 03:23 PM
The Gleas
MEGAsquirt
3
Oct 1, 2015 09:30 AM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:06 AM.