Notices

Begi Churbo vs. GT2554R

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 25, 2015 | 06:06 PM
  #21  
1993z32's Avatar
Thread Starter
TheCarPassionChannel
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 188
Total Cats: 136
From: San Diego, Ca
Default

Originally Posted by Braineack
need real dyno comparisons. the auto cam shouldnt drop off until at least 6K.

Ive seen one a long time ago one a greddy kit, ill try to pull the before and afters.


the auto cam should gain responsiveness and provide a huge bump between 3 and 5k.
Well, a cam is easy enough to swap on the dyno, I'll try to get back to backs the next time I'm on the dyno as long as I can find that cam. I'm skeptical about the lift but am very intrigued by the effects of reduced overlap on a turbo engine.
Old Aug 26, 2015 | 10:39 AM
  #22  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

Originally Posted by 1993z32
I'm skeptical about the lift but am very intrigued by the effects of reduced overlap on a turbo engine.
yeah that. actually, it ends up with the same 20° overlap when i calculate it, but with both less lift and duration.

i was always under the impression the exhaust cam was the same, but it doesnt appear to be that way, at least according to solomita.


the few boosted auto motors I've seen dyno had a healthy mid range bump, with similar losses after 6K, but I've never actually seen the auto cam only. Like I said, always thought exhaust cam was the same. I'm sure they were designed to get more grunt out of the slushbox.

Last edited by Braineack; Aug 26, 2015 at 10:50 AM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Full_Tilt_Boogie
Build Threads
84
Apr 12, 2021 04:21 PM
StratoBlue1109
Miata parts for sale/trade
21
Sep 30, 2018 01:09 PM
tazswing
Race Prep
20
Oct 3, 2015 11:04 AM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:09 PM.