Notices

FE3 t3/t4 Miata

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 14, 2007 | 12:07 PM
  #1  
m2cupcar's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,486
Total Cats: 372
From: Atlanta
Default FE3 t3/t4 Miata

Fell "victim" to conservative AF targets. Final run 3 showed ~10rwhp/ftlbs gain with 4 points of Link master fuel removed. AFR on that run (16 to 14 to 16 psi) ran 11.2 at the power peak to 10.6 in the dip and to 7k. Pulling the master killed spool since the low end went lean, but showed how rich the higher boost was as the torque falls, the hp plateaus and then falls. Lots of tuning left to do.
Attached Thumbnails FE3 t3/t4 Miata-dyno051207640.jpg  
Old May 14, 2007 | 04:06 PM
  #2  
Markp's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,380
Total Cats: 2
Default

Originally Posted by m2cupcar
Fell "victim" to conservative AF targets. Final run 3 showed ~10rwhp/ftlbs gain with 4 points of Link master fuel removed. AFR on that run (16 to 14 to 16 psi) ran 11.2 at the power peak to 10.6 in the dip and to 7k. Pulling the master killed spool since the low end went lean, but showed how rich the higher boost was as the torque falls, the hp plateaus and then falls. Lots of tuning left to do.
I think you need to consider swapping that turbine housing for a .63 housing, with a 2.0 you should have enough motor, additionally at 15 PSI that turbo should be making alot more power. I suspect timing is far to conservative up top too, just a guess.

Mark
Old May 14, 2007 | 04:39 PM
  #3  
y8s's Avatar
y8s
DEI liberal femininity
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 19,338
Total Cats: 574
From: Fake Virginia
Default

looks good rob. i agree on the turbine housing. i'm running a .64 a/r and it's not too much. (the .86 woulda been)

did you measure knock for your pulls?
Old May 14, 2007 | 04:43 PM
  #4  
m2cupcar's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,486
Total Cats: 372
From: Atlanta
Default

I think you are exactly right. I didn't swap the turbine to the .63 at the time because it was going to require rebuilding the entire downpipe and I'd come to the end of the road for fabrication time. Also required another wastegate solution. I've got a 5-bolt merc and my .63 is 5-bolt ford.

I based all my maps on the FM defaults and it hurt on the dyno. NA 1.8 with an avo ran 250rwhp on the same dyno with a link at 12:1 and 15psi. I'm tuned for 11.1 at 15psi. I have no horsepower on the top end. Other FE3s keep climbing like the BPs - so there's lots tuning left up there. I'll get there. I'm a newb at this tuning stuff.

I know of an Mx3, same engine and turbo - 293whp at 14psi. So I know I should be near there.

I just wanted to leave the dyno w/o my SSA manifold coming apart.

No knock with any of the changes. More room for less fuel and more advance.
Old May 14, 2007 | 04:47 PM
  #5  
jayc72's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,908
Total Cats: 1
From: Edmonton, AB
Default

When adding timing do you just slowly add it across all areas, see where you are getting knock and then adjust those areas back?
Old May 14, 2007 | 04:51 PM
  #6  
Splitime's Avatar
Miotta FTW!
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,290
Total Cats: 31
From: Chicagoland, IL
Default

You want to push timing up until knock... then pull mostly at Peak torque. After that a slow rise in timing usually works.

At least... thats the rule of thumb I've been told to follow.
Old May 14, 2007 | 04:54 PM
  #7  
m2cupcar's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,486
Total Cats: 372
From: Atlanta
Default

I can't think of another way to do it- especially street tuning. I just adjust the IGN TRIM and look for knock. Keep bumping the trim, then pulling back on any zones with knock. Make the final over all MAP adjustment based on your trim to zero it out.
Old May 14, 2007 | 05:03 PM
  #8  
jayc72's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,908
Total Cats: 1
From: Edmonton, AB
Default

Figured that's the way to do it. Just seems sort of ham fisted.
Old May 14, 2007 | 05:04 PM
  #9  
y8s's Avatar
y8s
DEI liberal femininity
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 19,338
Total Cats: 574
From: Fake Virginia
Default

Originally Posted by Splitime
You want to push timing up until knock... then pull mostly at Peak torque. After that a slow rise in timing usually works.

At least... thats the rule of thumb I've been told to follow.
well, you want to push it up til you stop making more power--hopefully without knock. no point in going beyond that to find knock.
Old May 14, 2007 | 05:17 PM
  #10  
m2cupcar's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,486
Total Cats: 372
From: Atlanta
Default

IGN tuning is just way easier on a dyno for that reason. But I've sync'd my DLL power graph settings to match my dyno sheet - so that should help with street tuning.
Old May 14, 2007 | 05:19 PM
  #11  
jayc72's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,908
Total Cats: 1
From: Edmonton, AB
Default

How do you do that Rob? How does DLL calculate power? Timed acceleration?
Old May 14, 2007 | 06:44 PM
  #12  
y8s's Avatar
y8s
DEI liberal femininity
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 19,338
Total Cats: 574
From: Fake Virginia
Default

Originally Posted by m2cupcar
IGN tuning is just way easier on a dyno for that reason. But I've sync'd my DLL power graph settings to match my dyno sheet - so that should help with street tuning.
mine look nothin like each other. go figure. not even remotely.
Old May 14, 2007 | 09:00 PM
  #13  
m2cupcar's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,486
Total Cats: 372
From: Atlanta
Default

It's in the tools menu. Input your specs and graph. I just dropped weight on the car until they were similar. What I'm using it for is to show a difference (hopefully improvement) after making changes and doing another log. I'm sure it's based on the weight, gearing (among other specs) and time of rpm change.
Old May 14, 2007 | 10:39 PM
  #14  
y8s's Avatar
y8s
DEI liberal femininity
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 19,338
Total Cats: 574
From: Fake Virginia
Default

I did... if I try to match the peak power, it looks only vaguely similar. I tried fooling with drag coeff and dyno corrections and I can change the shape, but it says 800 rwhp. haha.

Last edited by y8s; Jan 12, 2009 at 12:34 PM.
Old May 14, 2007 | 11:11 PM
  #15  
m2cupcar's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,486
Total Cats: 372
From: Atlanta
Default

yeah, mine's much closer. Does a good job of matching the flat areas after torque peak.
Old May 15, 2007 | 03:46 AM
  #16  
Markp's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,380
Total Cats: 2
Default

Originally Posted by m2cupcar

I know of an Mx3, same engine and turbo - 293whp at 14psi. So I know I should be near there.
Same turbo at 14 PSI peak falling off a bit on the high end of the curve I made 295 RWHP in a miata, so yes I agree that's a good target to shoot for. This was done on a built 1.9 BP motor with higher compression hence less boost to make the same power roughly.

Mark
Old May 15, 2007 | 06:03 PM
  #17  
TurboTim's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 7,035
Total Cats: 425
From: Chesterfield, NJ
Default

Holy Torque.
Old May 15, 2007 | 06:14 PM
  #18  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

me no like FM defaults
Old May 16, 2007 | 09:26 AM
  #19  
m2cupcar's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,486
Total Cats: 372
From: Atlanta
Default

Peak torque should be at ~5k+ - yet another indicator more tuning is needed.

No kidding. It's safe for sure.

I actually referenced your last IGN map, and Y8s' for tweaking mine. Pulled about -1.5 adv from yours for my .5 compression. No knock on the first run. Then I bumped advance 1* and got some knock. Haven't looked at the log yet. Curious to see where it is. EGTs appeared lower. I actually found a stretch of vacant hwy in ATL that allowed me to run to redline in 4th and 6500 in 5th before shutting it down. Should be some good data.
Old May 16, 2007 | 09:32 AM
  #20  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

lower EGTs are probably a good sign the timing is back where it needs to be.

I myself ordered a KnocksenseMS so I can log/see knock events so I can do a better job a dialing in the IGN...plus a loaded dyno wont hurt..



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:09 PM.