GTX2867R, FM log mani, 1.8, 8.4cr
4 Attachment(s)
1.8, iron log FM manifold, GTX2867R, 3in turbo back, pump 93, MS1, Deatchwerks 750cc injectors, LS2 coils, 8.4cr Supertech pistons, Crower rods, Boundary pump, NA8 head ported by Miata2fast, stock valves, Supertech light double springs, stock cams.
The blips in the first run were where it was hitting overboost at about 15.25psi About 15psi 262whp @ 5810rpm 252tq @ 5050rpm https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1446468395 https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1446468585 |
screenshot of spark map?
|
1 Attachment(s)
|
1 Attachment(s)
|
Nice, thanks. That's about where I am right now with timing & afr on my gt2560r
|
I don't think I'd call that spark table conservative.
|
I wouldn't call it conservative either.
Why is the spark table 8x8? |
Originally Posted by Erat
(Post 1280260)
I wouldn't call it conservative either.
Why is the spark table 8x8? |
Originally Posted by sixshooter
(Post 1280171)
very conservative spark
|
Originally Posted by Savington
(Post 1280257)
I don't think I'd call that spark table conservative.
Originally Posted by Erat
(Post 1280260)
I wouldn't call it conservative either.
I seem to recall adding two degrees to the top of the map back a year and a half ago because I felt there was too much heat in the exhaust because of the (I thought) overly retarded timing. I saw a few others running more and felt I could safely add a couple.
Originally Posted by patsmx5
(Post 1280266)
Ha, you're running within a couple degrees as much as I'm running on E85. I would hardly call that very conservative.
|
IMO the 183 row is really the one that's kinda aggressive, and maybe the 212 by 1 or 2, top row aint that bad.
and y'all have proper fuel and not CA 91oct water, so I don't even think it's that bad. also the spark is not 8x8, that's the afr target table, unless we're looking at different tables. ...I'm not really impressed with how late that thing comes on though, that's for sure. |
Originally Posted by 18psi
(Post 1280385)
...I'm not really impressed with how late that thing comes on though, that's for sure.
|
Yep, I remember that.
|
I know it's not apples to apples but at 10:1 and with VVT I was able to get over 200lbft by 3750 rpm on a precision 4828 on a BEGI cast manifold. (195kpa)
|
Originally Posted by sixshooter
(Post 1280346)
...
Are you using low or high compression pistons with the E85? FWIW I think your spark map is great if it doesn't knock, just noting that's not super conservative. |
Originally Posted by 18psi
(Post 1280385)
...I'm not really impressed with how late that thing comes on though, that's for sure.
|
Originally Posted by sixshooter
(Post 1280510)
Me either. It has the .86 hotside but with ball bearings and a billet wheel I expected better.
|
Originally Posted by patsmx5
(Post 1280529)
On my GT3271, I found a lot of spoolage by not running pig rich while it spools. I ran it around 14:1 at 100kPa, 13:1 at 140kPa, etc, tapering to target AFRs when you get to target. That made a very very nice improvement in both driveability and spool. Worth a shot since your posted AFR target table is richer than needed at very low boost.
|
Originally Posted by Savington
(Post 1280558)
Great advice if you want to blow your motor up.
|
Originally Posted by Savington
(Post 1280558)
Great advice if you want to blow your motor up.
|
I would have thought a bit more fuel in the ramp up section would cause it to still be burning when the exhaust valve opens and therefore expanding in the exhaust manifold. But that's just a preliminary thought since you brought it up. I'll have a cup of coffee and think about it.
|
Originally Posted by 18psi
(Post 1280385)
...I'm not really impressed with how late that thing comes on though, that's for sure.
|
Yep, that too. It falls off really hard up top, so it's lose/lose
|
Originally Posted by 1993z32
(Post 1280662)
I'm actually a little surprised at the top end, 15psi on a turbo that big with a 1.8L and makes the same torque as my 2554R/stock 1.6L/Begi mani/2.5" exh/13psi from 6000 to redline? I am on E85 but I figured the GTX with a 3" exhaust would be flowing a lot more efficiently than a 2554 in the high revs. :dunno:
|
I dont think begi made the s4/s6 for the 1.6
|
Originally Posted by sixshooter
(Post 1280631)
I would have thought a bit more fuel in the ramp up section would cause it to still be burning when the exhaust valve opens and therefore expanding in the exhaust manifold. But that's just a preliminary thought since you brought it up. I'll have a cup of coffee and think about it.
|
Originally Posted by patsmx5
(Post 1280529)
On my GT3271, I found a lot of spoolage by not running pig rich while it spools. I ran it around 14:1 at 100kPa, 13:1 at 140kPa, etc, tapering to target AFRs when you get to target. That made a very very nice improvement in both driveability and spool. Worth a shot since your posted AFR target table is richer than needed at very low boost.
|
Originally Posted by sixshooter
(Post 1280718)
Log begi mani or tubular?
|
which (imo) is still better than the FM in terms of flow, but still lightyears behind proper tubulars
|
A year later....did this ever get figured out? Im trying to pick my next turbo but these results aren't helping. It took codrus 24 psi and 100 octane to make 340 on the 63mm billet wheel. I still think the bigger gt2871 may be superior to the billet stuff
|
Yeah, threadsurrection, but..
These numbers are far from impressive, Im about to run a Premium Gasoline NB8a setup with a GTX2871 and if it doesnt destroy this setup ill be so mad. Dann |
Even a standard gt2871 should destroy this. A gtx2863 did destroy this. Thats why i asked if it got figured out because something is up
|
I haven't changed anything since that dyno run except some reliability mods. The possible restrictions are the FM log mani, the 70 degree bend in the 3in downpipe about 10 inches from the turbine outlet, the 2" hotside intercooler piping, the intercooler, etc. Everyone so far says my timing is good, but pointers are welcome. Is base timing off or maybe a tooth off on a camshaft? I'm not sure.
It's been parked mostly and I've been busy selling a house. But I'd love some ideas. |
Originally Posted by sixshooter
(Post 1358677)
I haven't changed anything since that dyno run except some reliability mods. The possible restrictions are the FM log mani, the 70 degree bend in the 3in downpipe about 10 inches from the turbine outlet, the 2" hotside intercooler piping, the intercooler, etc. Everyone so far says my timing is good, but pointers are welcome. Is base timing off or maybe a tooth off on a camshaft? I'm not sure.
It's been parked mostly and I've been busy selling a house. But I'd love some ideas. 2 inch hotside IC piping shouldn't be a big deal either. Again, FM runs 2 inch and its fine. And the standard size for the turbo outlet is 2 inch Whats your air filter setup? Maybe choking the big azz turbo? Still puzzling tho. Im still thinking this is the turbo for my goals but if i struggle to hit even 300whp ill be mad asf |
7 Attachment(s)
Air filter is of adequate size but is in a poor location. Using NA8 intake manifold and Skunk2 throttle body. 3 inch downpipe is covered in heat shields but I have an old picture from a prior disassembly depicting the sharp turn. It is still many times larger than the turbine outlet so even though it's not ideal I don't know if it could cause a tremendous amount of restriction.
This is the downpipe and manifold (with a different turbo). https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...426_113819.jpg This is a good depiction of the difference between the turbine outlet size and the 3in pipe: https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...426_132910.jpg Again, the bend in the downpipe (very old pic, many of the surrounding components have been changed or rerouted): https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...426_113532.jpg As she sits this morning. Note air filter location far less than ideal. https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...906_074552.jpg https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...906_074531.jpg |
Originally Posted by sixshooter
(Post 1358677)
I haven't changed anything since that dyno run except some reliability mods. The possible restrictions are the FM log mani, the 70 degree bend in the 3in downpipe about 10 inches from the turbine outlet, the 2" hotside intercooler piping, the intercooler, etc. Everyone so far says my timing is good, but pointers are welcome. Is base timing off or maybe a tooth off on a camshaft? I'm not sure.
It's been parked mostly and I've been busy selling a house. But I'd love some ideas. |
the cheated radius on the downpipe right at the turbine exit doesnt look like it would promote flow very well but who knows. thats not the gtx2867 is it? looks like a small chinese thing
|
Originally Posted by LownSlow616
(Post 1358759)
thats not the gtx2867 is it? looks like a small chinese thing
https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...906_074531.jpg This was Chinese 2870: https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...426_113819.jpg |
Originally Posted by shuiend
(Post 1280389)
I think that is due to the cast manifold. Hustler had some old threads about his 2860 spooling like donkey shit on a begi cast manifold.
|
Originally Posted by Girz0r
(Post 1358769)
YUP. :eggplant:
if i had a turbo that big and shiny and was making as much power as ppl with stock engine and gt2560 id lose sleep at night. not even trying to sound like an ass, just trying to pick my next turbo and i cant have this happen to me... |
1 Attachment(s)
Originally Posted by LownSlow616
(Post 1358682)
Still puzzling tho. Im still thinking this is the turbo for my goals but if i struggle to hit even 300whp ill be mad asf
Virtual Dyno results of my last car: GTX2860, E85, begi cast manifold, stock '99 pistons, forged rods Attachment 183235 |
Originally Posted by pdexta
(Post 1358784)
Don't give up on the GTX lineup just because one setup doesn't post dyno numbers you're looking for. People have hit 300whp on a GT2560, no reason at all that you shouldn't expect a GTX2867 to do it. As much as these turbos seem to like high boost sixshooter would be +300whp with a few more psi, it's not like he couldn't get there if he wanted to.
Virtual Dyno results of my last car: GTX2860, E85, begi cast manifold, stock '99 pistons, forged rods http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/j...13.15.pull.png Ive been reading compressor maps a little and i think im going with the gtx2871. Wont even be breaking a sweat at 320whp and I could probably see 400whp someday if i get an allofit engine. my next goal is 340whp on a stock 99 engine with manley rods and e85 |
Originally Posted by LownSlow616
(Post 1358787)
i believe these VD results with the 11 second passes on there. what size turbine housing are you using?
It's .72 a/r. Special Turbine Housing T25 Inlet, Cast 44mm EWG Port : atpturbo.com |
Originally Posted by pdexta
(Post 1358806)
Haha, thanks.
It's .72 a/r. |
I think the oddly low peak power in the RPM range is a clue as to where to look for the problem.
|
Originally Posted by miata2fast
(Post 1358821)
I think the oddly low peak power in the RPM range is a clue as to where to look for the problem.
|
it is my understanding that it would shift the power curve one way or the other depending on whether advanced/retarded, and it looks like you have neither the low end grunt nor the top end power.
I'm thinking restriction |
Originally Posted by pdexta
(Post 1358784)
Don't give up on the GTX lineup just because one setup doesn't post dyno numbers you're looking for. People have hit 300whp on a GT2560, no reason at all that you shouldn't expect a GTX2867 to do it
http://www.codrus.com/dyno/synergy-O...ynergy-265.png --Ian |
Originally Posted by codrus
(Post 1359005)
I made 340 rwhp on a GTX2863, a 2867 is capable of more. Lots of boost and enough octane to run decent amounts of timing. This was with 24 psi of boost, and there's a lot more power there if I had more octane:
http://www.codrus.com/dyno/synergy-O...ynergy-265.png --Ian Its tough bc im pretty sure the 67 can do it but i feel like the 71 will be able to do it easier with less tuning and have way more headroom. Plus its only 4mm bigger..which will be like 2 or 300 rpm less spool. Not even a big deal |
Originally Posted by LownSlow616
(Post 1359007)
Ill be using e85. I want 330-maybe350whp. I know the gtx2867 can do it, I just don't want to run crazy high boost. I want to be at 330whp around 20psi.
330-350 should be quite doable on E85, though. --Ian |
Ill be on stock pistons. I don't care about the actual boost number. I just assumed more boost would add more chance for det, wear the rings more, make the turbo less efficient, etc. I think the power would be more reliable at a little less boost pressure? Or am i retarded?
|
you need to read moar young grasshopper
|
Originally Posted by 18psi
(Post 1358988)
it is my understanding that it would shift the power curve one way or the other depending on whether advanced/retarded, and it looks like you have neither the low end grunt nor the top end power.
I'm thinking restriction |
oh the downpipe is junk. but while the shape is terrible, it seems to still have at least 2.5" worth of girth so I dunno if it's choking at only 250
|
Originally Posted by LownSlow616
(Post 1359019)
Ill be on stock pistons. I don't care about the actual boost number. I just assumed more boost would add more chance for det, wear the rings more, make the turbo less efficient, etc. I think the power would be more reliable at a little less boost pressure? Or am i retarded?
Generally speaking, torque is proportional to MAP times displacement. Engine breathing mods will move the torque peak further up or down the RPM band, but they won't really change the peak value by all that much. Since power == torque * RPM, this means that you get more power either by adding more torque (and with fixed displacement this means more boost) or with more revs. More revs means cams, head work, better-flowing manifolds, etc. The parts and knowledge for building a Miata motor to take boost are generally cheaper, more available, and easier to DIY than for revs. From what I've read (never tried it myself), stock pistons can be used for higher boost better than stock rods can, but will reduce your margin for safety in detonation. --Ian |
Originally Posted by 18psi
(Post 1359030)
oh the downpipe is junk. but while the shape is terrible, it seems to still have at least 2.5" worth of girth so I dunno if it's choking at only 250
--Ian |
Check to make sure the throttle body is opening up all the way when mashing the pedal before doing anything else.
|
Originally Posted by 18psi
(Post 1359022)
you need to read moar young grasshopper
If i was at 22psi (2.5 pressure ratio) flowing the 40 lb/min, this turbo would be most efficient and have plenty of headroom https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.mia...a4d7959ba1.jpg |
Please start your own thread, and let us talk about how to help Sixshooter.
|
Originally Posted by miata2fast
(Post 1359098)
Please start your own thread, and let us talk about how to help Sixshooter.
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:58 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands