Notices

STD vs SAE correction

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 20, 2009 | 08:59 AM
  #1  
ArtieParty's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,118
Total Cats: 0
From: Trenton, NJ
Default STD vs SAE correction

I've been trying to google the difference in the 2 and can't really seem to find any formula's or anything except people on forums talking about it which one is accepted.

Can someone shed some light on the subject and tell us exactly what goes into each?

Reason I ask is because I noticed something in the dynojet files that we use in Newark, DE and was wondering if that made a difference in the numbers or not.
Old Nov 20, 2009 | 09:13 AM
  #2  
hustler's Avatar
Tour de Franzia
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 29,085
Total Cats: 375
From: Republic of Dallas
Default

In for answer.
Old Nov 20, 2009 | 09:32 AM
  #3  
therieldeal's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 547
Total Cats: 2
From: Northeastern CT
Default

SAE correction "corrects" your dyno numbers to standardized temp, atmospheric pressure, etc in an attempt to make dyno runs from one day comparable to dyno runs on a different day with totally different weather conditions.

it actually works pretty well... for n/a cars. for turbo cars the air actually going into the engine is so far seperated from the actual atmospheric conditions, that SAE corrections tend to wildly overcompensate.

personally i always go by the actual uncorrected numbers...
Old Nov 20, 2009 | 09:52 AM
  #4  
ArtieParty's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,118
Total Cats: 0
From: Trenton, NJ
Default

Originally Posted by therieldeal
SAE correction "corrects" your dyno numbers to standardized temp, atmospheric pressure, etc in an attempt to make dyno runs from one day comparable to dyno runs on a different day with totally different weather conditions.

it actually works pretty well... for n/a cars. for turbo cars the air actually going into the engine is so far seperated from the actual atmospheric conditions, that SAE corrections tend to wildly overcompensate.

personally i always go by the actual uncorrected numbers...
This is exactly what is on every other forum which gives almost no info. I'm looking for an actual explanation, not just "it uses etc and it corrects".
Old Nov 20, 2009 | 09:57 AM
  #5  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,541
Total Cats: 4,364
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

I just look at the number it gives my run and I can see it'll correct it by 1.02 or .98 I've never seen much more than that.
Old Nov 20, 2009 | 10:01 AM
  #6  
harleybutter's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 269
Total Cats: 0
From: Garner, NC
Default

Try this link:
Equations: Dyno Correction Factor and Relative Horsepower

Seems to give some equations and reasoning behind it.
Old Nov 20, 2009 | 10:05 AM
  #7  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,541
Total Cats: 4,364
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

hey look at that: exactly what he was lookin for.
Old Nov 20, 2009 | 10:21 AM
  #8  
ArtieParty's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,118
Total Cats: 0
From: Trenton, NJ
Default

Originally Posted by harleybutter
Try this link:
Equations: Dyno Correction Factor and Relative Horsepower

Seems to give some equations and reasoning behind it.
That is exactly what I was looking for. Except that it didn't touch on STD correction factors. But I think that's ok.

What I was really looking for is if elevation was part of the equation at all. Because the elevation the dyno has set in WinPEP is wayyyyy off for Newark, DE.

Thanks guys!
Old Nov 20, 2009 | 10:45 AM
  #9  
harleybutter's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 269
Total Cats: 0
From: Garner, NC
Default

Changes in elevation should make a difference in:
Pd = the pressure of the dry air, mb.
Old Nov 20, 2009 | 10:48 AM
  #10  
ScottFW's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,361
Total Cats: 17
From: Falls Church, VA
Default

Originally Posted by ArtieParty
Because the elevation the dyno has set in WinPEP is wayyyyy off for Newark, DE.
Insert comment about FM corrected dyno numbers here.
Old Nov 20, 2009 | 10:57 AM
  #11  
therieldeal's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 547
Total Cats: 2
From: Northeastern CT
Default

Originally Posted by ArtieParty
What I was really looking for is if elevation was part of the equation at all. Because the elevation the dyno has set in WinPEP is wayyyyy off for Newark, DE.
physical elevation is irrelevant, what's important is density altitude. that could be the number your looking at...
Old Nov 20, 2009 | 11:40 AM
  #12  
y8s's Avatar
y8s
DEI liberal femininity
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 19,338
Total Cats: 574
From: Fake Virginia
Default

just as a point of reference, most plots brain and i post are set to STD correction, smoothing at 5.
Old Nov 20, 2009 | 11:59 AM
  #13  
ArtieParty's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,118
Total Cats: 0
From: Trenton, NJ
Default

Originally Posted by therieldeal
physical elevation is irrelevant, what's important is density altitude. that could be the number your looking at...
No, I'm looking at physical elevation.



If it's a field there, I'm going under the assumption that it may be part of the correction. It says elevation 4500ft, but if you actually google Newark, DE it says average 75 ft.
Old Nov 20, 2009 | 12:00 PM
  #14  
ArtieParty's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,118
Total Cats: 0
From: Trenton, NJ
Default

Originally Posted by y8s
just as a point of reference, most plots brain and i post are set to STD correction, smoothing at 5.
Yup, that's what Paul and I do too.
Old Nov 20, 2009 | 12:09 PM
  #15  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,541
Total Cats: 4,364
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

weird my runs show 0ft. my SAE correction is .98. yours is the same correction.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bigmackloud
Miata parts for sale/trade
19
Jan 8, 2021 11:24 AM
Zaphod
MEGAsquirt
47
Oct 26, 2018 11:00 PM
Frank_and_Beans
Supercharger Discussion
13
Sep 12, 2016 08:17 PM
iparnell
MEGAsquirt
2
Sep 13, 2015 07:04 PM
Motorsport-Electronics
ECUs and Tuning
0
Sep 5, 2015 08:02 AM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:55 AM.