Notices

Virtual Dyno - '00 MK Turbo

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 25, 2017 | 03:20 PM
  #1  
sv650_ck's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 457
Total Cats: 3
Default Virtual Dyno - '00 MK Turbo

At the limits of the 1.6 super miata clutch

Name:  bd61wCO.jpg
Views: 84
Size:  55.2 KB

Name:  qjFaTJw.jpg
Views: 162
Size:  1.60 MB
Old Mar 25, 2017 | 03:55 PM
  #2  
mmmjesse's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 574
Total Cats: 44
Default

you porbably have more power left on the table up top. way rich up there. get it back to about 11.8. Consider the FM clutch. its a really good unit.
Old Mar 28, 2017 | 02:51 PM
  #3  
shuiend's Avatar
mkturbo.com
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 15,235
Total Cats: 1,700
From: Charleston SC
Default

Looks pretty good for being on just the wastegate. Hopefully you are enjoying it.
Old Apr 1, 2017 | 10:29 PM
  #4  
ridethecliche's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 3,890
Total Cats: 146
From: New Fucking Jersey
Default

Wait, the clutch is slipping already? The organic is supposed to be good for 220 lb ft of torque though.
Old Apr 2, 2017 | 07:16 AM
  #5  
sv650_ck's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 457
Total Cats: 3
Default

Originally Posted by ridethecliche
Wait, the clutch is slipping already? The organic is supposed to be good for 220 lb ft of torque though.
IIRC when it first came out the SM 1.6 organic clutch was rated for 200ft-lbs. Crank vs wheel rating? Adding a passenger; abusive driving, or upping the boost a tiny bit and slips. Thinking of going with their ceramic 1.6 which is rated for 270ft-lbs.
Old Apr 2, 2017 | 07:46 AM
  #6  
sv650_ck's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 457
Total Cats: 3
Default

Originally Posted by shuiend
Looks pretty good for being on just the wastegate. Hopefully you are enjoying it.
Yes, it's been lots of fun. Many thanks for a quality kit that's fabricated in the US.
Old Apr 3, 2017 | 05:09 PM
  #7  
mmmjesse's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 574
Total Cats: 44
Default

Originally Posted by sv650_ck
IIRC when it first came out the SM 1.6 organic clutch was rated for 200ft-lbs. Crank vs wheel rating? Adding a passenger; abusive driving, or upping the boost a tiny bit and slips. Thinking of going with their ceramic 1.6 which is rated for 270ft-lbs.
Why are you running a 1.6 clutch?? You should just go with the FM stage 1 and not have to worry about slip again.
Old Apr 3, 2017 | 07:27 PM
  #8  
sv650_ck's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 457
Total Cats: 3
Default

Originally Posted by mmmjesse
Why are you running a 1.6 clutch?? You should just go with the FM stage 1 and not have to worry about slip again.
I really like the way the LWFW and 1.6 clutch spin up on my previous and current set-ups. But yeah I want to up the boost and not have to worry about the clutch.

Name:  DSC00467_zps4d1f5a1b.jpg
Views: 399
Size:  90.8 KB




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:49 PM.