ECUs and Tuning Discuss Engine Management, Tuning, & Programming

Cost Effectiveness of different ECUs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-11-2012, 05:37 PM
  #61  
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
18psi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,481
Default

Ahh, I was unaware they made all the changes revisions and updates. That makes more sense why people like Dem and lassi are having much better experience with their units.
18psi is offline  
Old 08-11-2012, 06:08 PM
  #62  
I'm Miserable!
 
Techsalvager's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: albany, ga
Posts: 1,866
Total Cats: 0
Default

Originally Posted by spikes
I've been doing a bit of research into cost effectiveness of pricier ECUs like Adaptronic, Hydra, Link, Motec, etc..

From what I've gathered, those brand names where countless hours of R&D from engineers whom have more insight into engine control fundamentals to developing more sophisticated functions, like for example temp correction modeling, transient fuel, overall drivability control functions, having only one single axis injector offset and being hard to control 1000cc+ injectors and more advanced boost control and data logging.

So fair enough yeah, if you were building an all engine NA build, and an optimised tune so spark and fuel (which dramatically changes with temps) is exactly what the engine requires.
But for the average guy, who isn't chasing the ultimate HP/absolute absolute perfect drivability and tune and not willing to empty their pockets, how can he justify/weighing up between spending $500 vs $1500 ECU?
You get what you pay for, if I were to do it again I wouldn't even touched a megashit after dealing with mine and others. Sure it can run an engine but its missing many things to run an engine even close to OEM setup.
At the price point a AEM EMS 4 with harness is nearly the same cost of a MS3x with harness
When I checked its around a 100 dollar difference compared.

You do get what you pay for.
The average person will probably try to save money going with the cheaper esp thinking it can do all it says based on the features listed. I see it happen lot in person and on the internet.

Theres more to it then just perferct driveability and tune. Would you like your car\ecu to leave you stranded when one of the sensor goes bad?
Techsalvager is offline  
Reply
Leave a poscat -6 Leave a negcat
Old 08-11-2012, 06:21 PM
  #63  
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
18psi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,481
Default

18psi is offline  
Old 08-11-2012, 06:42 PM
  #64  
y8s
2 Props,3 Dildos,& 1 Cat
iTrader: (8)
 
y8s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Fake Virginia
Posts: 19,338
Total Cats: 573
Default

Originally Posted by Techsalvager
Theres more to it then just perferct driveability and tune. Would you like your car\ecu to leave you stranded when one of the sensor goes bad?
you mean the OEM cam and crank sensors or the $30 MAP sensor?
y8s is offline  
Old 08-11-2012, 06:49 PM
  #65  
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Leafy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: NH
Posts: 9,479
Total Cats: 104
Default

Originally Posted by y8s
you mean the OEM cam and crank sensors or the $30 MAP sensor?
You mean you dont also do a backup tps based OH **** tune?
Leafy is offline  
Old 08-11-2012, 07:54 PM
  #66  
I'm Miserable!
 
Techsalvager's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: albany, ga
Posts: 1,866
Total Cats: 0
Default

Originally Posted by y8s
you mean the OEM cam and crank sensors or the $30 MAP sensor?
Any input sensor being used by the ecu to control the engine.

You mean you dont also do a backup tps based OH **** tune?
Yes but that requires mean to have to the laptop on me at all times. What if I don't have it on me when some sensor takes a ****?
Not as simple as just disconnecting the maf\map and turning the car on and driving off.
Techsalvager is offline  
Reply
Leave a poscat -4 Leave a negcat
Old 08-11-2012, 08:21 PM
  #67  
Elite Member
iTrader: (6)
 
blaen99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,611
Total Cats: 25
Default

I see Tech is back to trollin', and giving himself props for every goddamn thing he posts.

Originally Posted by Techsalvager
Any input sensor being used by the ecu to control the engine.

Yes but that requires mean to have to the laptop on me at all times. What if I don't have it on me when some sensor takes a ****?
Not as simple as just disconnecting the maf\map and turning the car on and driving off.
Considering that I've had the car running on a megasquirt with every sensor either miscalibrated, not working or unplugged at some point or another but for the CAS/tach stuff, I think you don't know what you are talking about.

/Equally, I think I should probably make less mistakes on the sensors.
blaen99 is offline  
Reply
Leave a poscat -1 Leave a negcat
Old 08-11-2012, 08:37 PM
  #68  
I'm Miserable!
 
Techsalvager's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: albany, ga
Posts: 1,866
Total Cats: 0
Default

Originally Posted by blaen99
I see Tech is back to trollin', and giving himself props for every goddamn thing he posts.



Considering that I've had the car running on a megasquirt with every sensor either miscalibrated, not working or unplugged at some point or another but for the CAS/tach stuff, I think you don't know what you are talking about.

/Equally, I think I should probably make less mistakes on the sensors.
rip out your load sensor throw it in the ditch and try to start your car and keep it running and driving around properly. Disconect the o2 sensor while driving in closed loop, Have your IAT become disconnected and watch the bitch over fuel by the default ideal gas law that is hardcoded, etc

I also don't give myself props for anything I post
Techsalvager is offline  
Reply
Leave a poscat -4 Leave a negcat
Old 08-11-2012, 08:42 PM
  #69  
Elite Member
iTrader: (6)
 
blaen99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,611
Total Cats: 25
Default

Originally Posted by Techsalvager
rip out your load sensor throw it in the ditch and try to start your car and keep it running and driving around properly.
Oh, you can /start/ it and even drive it to certain parameters of drive.

Disconect the o2 sensor while driving in closed loop,
...wut? This one is just funny Tech. You can drive fine without an O2 sensor in closed loop. It'll just pull/add (depending on O2 configuration) fuel of X% maximum of your fuel table, so you may run a bit rich or lean.

Have your IAT become disconnected and watch the bitch over fuel by the default ideal gas law that is hardcoded, etc
Oh, I've driven no problem with a disconnected IAT sensor.

I also don't give myself props for anything I post

Last edited by blaen99; 08-11-2012 at 08:55 PM.
blaen99 is offline  
Reply
Leave a poscat -1 Leave a negcat
Old 08-11-2012, 08:56 PM
  #70  
I'm Miserable!
 
Techsalvager's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: albany, ga
Posts: 1,866
Total Cats: 0
Default

I said drive around properly not "certain parameters of drive"
Techsalvager is offline  
Reply
Leave a poscat -1 Leave a negcat
Old 08-11-2012, 08:58 PM
  #71  
Elite Member
iTrader: (6)
 
blaen99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,611
Total Cats: 25
Default

Originally Posted by Techsalvager
I said drive around properly not "certain parameters of drive"
No, you said...

Theres more to it then just perferct driveability and tune. Would you like your car\ecu to leave you stranded when one of the sensor goes bad?


Stranded means something else entirely then what you think it means apparently.
blaen99 is offline  
Reply
Leave a poscat -1 Leave a negcat
Old 08-11-2012, 10:31 PM
  #72  
y8s
2 Props,3 Dildos,& 1 Cat
iTrader: (8)
 
y8s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Fake Virginia
Posts: 19,338
Total Cats: 573
Default

This started as a troll thread and it's trying to end as a troll thread.

Explain to me how the ECU choice matters when running speed density on any car?

One time my car died and had to be flat-bedded. A sensor died. It was the ******* OEM cam sensor.
y8s is offline  
Old 08-11-2012, 10:32 PM
  #73  
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Leafy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: NH
Posts: 9,479
Total Cats: 104
Default

Originally Posted by Techsalvager
Any input sensor being used by the ecu to control the engine.



Yes but that requires mean to have to the laptop on me at all times. What if I don't have it on me when some sensor takes a ****?
Not as simple as just disconnecting the maf\map and turning the car on and driving off.
Then you suck at using your ecu, you can set pretty much all of them to automatically use backup maps if something faults out.
Leafy is offline  
Old 08-11-2012, 10:36 PM
  #74  
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Leafy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: NH
Posts: 9,479
Total Cats: 104
Default

Originally Posted by y8s
This started as a troll thread and it's trying to end as a troll thread.

Explain to me how the ECU choice matters when running speed density on any car?

One time my car died and had to be flat-bedded. A sensor died. It was the ******* OEM cam sensor.
Um duh, didn't you know you could spend silly amounts of money and get an ecu that uses the knock sensor to detect the firing pulses? (Apprilla does something similar).
Leafy is offline  
Old 08-12-2012, 01:04 AM
  #75  
Moderator
iTrader: (12)
 
sixshooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 20,664
Total Cats: 3,013
Default

Toyota Pickup crank sensor failed a couple of years ago - truck stopped running completely in busy four lane street and had to call a tow truck. WTF are you talking about? Troll is trolling.

And on to "histograms", TS VEAL does tell you how many times the cell has been touched and how much weighting has occurred with the same little colored chart if you click on the correct tab to view it. The boxes are labeled "cell change" and "cell weighting" and are under the "status" tab in VEAL. It looks very similar to the example posted on the previous page. And you can have every parameter line traced (like an EKG at the hospital) with max and min values listed.
sixshooter is offline  
Old 08-13-2012, 09:30 AM
  #76  
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
concealer404's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,917
Total Cats: 2,201
Default

Originally Posted by Techsalvager
You get what you pay for, if I were to do it again I wouldn't even touched a megashit after dealing with mine and others. Sure it can run an engine but its missing many things to run an engine even close to OEM setup.
At the price point a AEM EMS 4 with harness is nearly the same cost of a MS3x with harness
When I checked its around a 100 dollar difference compared.

You do get what you pay for.
The average person will probably try to save money going with the cheaper esp thinking it can do all it says based on the features listed. I see it happen lot in person and on the internet.

Theres more to it then just perferct driveability and tune. Would you like your car\ecu to leave you stranded when one of the sensor goes bad?
wrong.

Wrong.

WRONG.

WRONG.

IT'S ALL WRONG.
concealer404 is offline  
Old 08-13-2012, 02:00 PM
  #77  
Elite Member
iTrader: (6)
 
blaen99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,611
Total Cats: 25
Default

And there comes the retaliatory negs from Techsalvager.
blaen99 is offline  
Old 08-13-2012, 02:03 PM
  #78  
I'm Miserable!
 
Techsalvager's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: albany, ga
Posts: 1,866
Total Cats: 0
Default

Originally Posted by concealer404
wrong.

Wrong.

WRONG.

WRONG.

IT'S ALL WRONG.
Just learned the word wrong?

There are features of MS that are poorly implemented, implemented wrong or touted as a feature when they shouldn't be.

AEM ems 4 with small harness
AEM SERIES 2 EMS-4 UNIVERSAL PROGRAMMABLE ENGINE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 30-6905 | eBay

759$ total for AEM EMS4 with small harness

MS3x
MegaSquirt-III EMS System with MS3X Expansion V3.57 - Assembled, Brushed Case DIYAutoTune.com
640$
required harnesses

8&#39 MegaSquirt Electronic Fuel Injection Wiring Harness (MS1 / MS2 / MS3 Ready DIYAutoTune.com
8&#39 MegaSquirt Wiring Harness for MS3X DIYAutoTune.com

779$ total for ms3x assembled with both required harnesses
*noted I used both the small 8" harnessed for the ms3/x

I guess the price difference between the two has shrunk now.
Techsalvager is offline  
Reply
Leave a poscat -1 Leave a negcat
Old 08-13-2012, 02:06 PM
  #79  
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Leafy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: NH
Posts: 9,479
Total Cats: 104
Default

You dont want to use that harness for the MS, you want to make it work with a factory connector. That D-sub connecter doesnt have a rating for cross talk the last time I checked, much less a good rating.
Leafy is offline  
Old 08-13-2012, 02:08 PM
  #80  
Elite Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Reverant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Athens, Greece
Posts: 5,979
Total Cats: 356
Default

Originally Posted by Techsalvager
Just learned the word wrong?

There are features of MS that are poorly implemented, implemented wrong or touted as a feature when they shouldn't be.
So, have you actually tested the AEM to check all the features work correctly and as advertised?
Reverant is offline  


Quick Reply: Cost Effectiveness of different ECUs



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:30 AM.