I got an LC-2 as well, wires in and works pretty much the same as the LC-1. It comes with an extension now so you can put the controller inside the cabin and not have to worry about shielding it from engine heat. I wish I knew about no free air calibration, that sounds way better, but alas I read the instructions and did the free air cal. Warm up seems about the same.
One question, my wideband and the dyno have never agreed in the past. Should I trust my new LC-2 with a fresh sensor or should I trust the dyno? The dyno reads about .2 to .4 leaner than my LC-1 did. The dyno operator wasn't very confident in the precision of their sensor either, plus it goes in the tailpipe, which is post-cat and who knows how many exhaust leaks further than my wideband. |
its pretty obvious which one you should trust more
|
Originally Posted by vitamin j
(Post 1072946)
I got an LC-2 as well, wires in and works pretty much the same as the LC-1. It comes with an extension now so you can put the controller inside the cabin and not have to worry about shielding it from engine heat. I wish I knew about no free air calibration, that sounds way better, but alas I read the instructions and did the free air cal. Warm up seems about the same.
One question, my wideband and the dyno have never agreed in the past. Should I trust my new LC-2 with a fresh sensor or should I trust the dyno? The dyno reads about .2 to .4 leaner than my LC-1 did. The dyno operator wasn't very confident in the precision of their sensor either, plus it goes in the tailpipe, which is post-cat and who knows how many exhaust leaks further than my wideband. Either way, an error of .2:1 AFR is pretty negligible in the real world, for this type of application. |
A tailpipe wideband read is so fundamentally flawed that words can't express how much it angers me when "reputable" shops tune like that.
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:34 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands