Notices
ECUs and Tuning Discuss Engine Management, Tuning, & Programming

spark table question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 28, 2020 | 04:22 PM
  #1  
Junkythecat's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newb
 
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 21
Total Cats: 3
From: Milwaukee
Default spark table question

I was just curious if there was a quick explanation to why the numbers are so different between the tables. They are all grabbed from base maps and i was just curious why and which seems the best/safest. This is just for learning. Not actually changing my car. Ijust haven't come across a good reason to explain it. I'm probably looking at the wrong posts. Sorry




Last edited by Junkythecat; Jul 28, 2020 at 04:26 PM. Reason: wrong files attached
Old Jul 28, 2020 | 04:44 PM
  #2  
mjcanton's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 55
Total Cats: 4
From: Maple Grove, MN
Default

What are your sources for these 3 maps? From a 30-second look, none of them look too out of line, and they are fairly similar. Bottom map looks conservative and could use some more timing in the low load cells between 2600 and 5500 rpm

Reasons why they could/should be different, in general:
  • Different engine compression ratios (higher compression is more susceptible to detonation)
  • Different fuel types (91, 93, E85, etc.. higher octane rating is less susceptible to detonation)
  • Risk tolerance; more timing = more power (to a point) however less margin for error for detonation, which can end in catastrophic engine failure if significant enough
  • Different experience, preference, goals..
Edit: Top map looks like one of Brain's...
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
zammish
MEGAsquirt
32
Jan 2, 2015 04:56 PM
Techsalvager
MEGAsquirt
3
Jun 28, 2011 05:17 AM
miatauser884
ECUs and Tuning
2
Mar 9, 2011 02:08 PM
jonljacobi
MEGAsquirt
20
Nov 29, 2010 05:04 PM
evank
MEGAsquirt
14
Oct 9, 2009 05:05 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:03 AM.