ECUs and Tuning Discuss Engine Management, Tuning, & Programming

spark table question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-28-2020, 04:22 PM
  #1  
Newb
Thread Starter
 
Junkythecat's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 21
Total Cats: 3
Default spark table question

I was just curious if there was a quick explanation to why the numbers are so different between the tables. They are all grabbed from base maps and i was just curious why and which seems the best/safest. This is just for learning. Not actually changing my car. Ijust haven't come across a good reason to explain it. I'm probably looking at the wrong posts. Sorry




Last edited by Junkythecat; 07-28-2020 at 04:26 PM. Reason: wrong files attached
Junkythecat is offline  
Old 07-28-2020, 04:44 PM
  #2  
Junior Member
 
mjcanton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Maple Grove, MN
Posts: 55
Total Cats: 4
Default

What are your sources for these 3 maps? From a 30-second look, none of them look too out of line, and they are fairly similar. Bottom map looks conservative and could use some more timing in the low load cells between 2600 and 5500 rpm

Reasons why they could/should be different, in general:
  • Different engine compression ratios (higher compression is more susceptible to detonation)
  • Different fuel types (91, 93, E85, etc.. higher octane rating is less susceptible to detonation)
  • Risk tolerance; more timing = more power (to a point) however less margin for error for detonation, which can end in catastrophic engine failure if significant enough
  • Different experience, preference, goals..
Edit: Top map looks like one of Brain's...
mjcanton is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
zammish
MEGAsquirt
32
01-02-2015 04:56 PM
Techsalvager
MEGAsquirt
3
06-28-2011 05:17 AM
miatauser884
ECUs and Tuning
2
03-09-2011 02:08 PM
jonljacobi
MEGAsquirt
20
11-29-2010 05:04 PM
evank
MEGAsquirt
14
10-09-2009 05:05 PM



Quick Reply: spark table question



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:18 AM.