Notices
Engine Performance This section is for discussion on all engine building related questions.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: KPower

1.6L Stock? Dyno results

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 8, 2013 | 05:58 PM
  #21  
t2couger's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 57
Total Cats: 6
From: College Station/Bryan
Default

Originally Posted by Braineack
ah ha!

Looks much better.
Old Apr 11, 2013 | 02:23 PM
  #22  
t2couger's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 57
Total Cats: 6
From: College Station/Bryan
Default

Funny how things that start out seaming easy get out proportion real quick. Can you help me with a parts List so i can start ordering things i am going to need? My goals here are simply to get my 1.6 running reliably ON THE TRACK in Texas heat with headers back exhaust and custom intake.

Things i will need to do seems to be adding up and i am a little unsure on what exactly i need.
1. MSPNP Gen2 and AFM delete
2. New injectors Hustler recommends EV6's
3. Prob going to need AFR MTX-L?? Water temp and Oil temp I like Defi stuff.
4. VTPS prob go with Wells201 one that Brain recommends and has a write up on. Edited because i fail.
5. Do i need an adjustable fuel pressure gauge? was looking at one that 5Xracing does.
6. Coolant reroute, ducting <--- added. I am already working on this 18 PSI pointed it out so i thought i would add it.
7. Next??

Last edited by t2couger; Apr 11, 2013 at 03:08 PM.
Old Apr 11, 2013 | 02:27 PM
  #23  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

I dont ever recommend the BMW TPS. I like the Wells201 mod.
Old Apr 11, 2013 | 03:01 PM
  #24  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

Originally Posted by t2couger
6. What am i missing?
To address the cooling system

a coolant re-route
possibly a better than stock radiator too
everything shrouded tightly

The list grows because you mentioned the words "track" and "reliably"

Those 2 key words make a very short list become a very long one
Old Apr 11, 2013 | 03:10 PM
  #25  
t2couger's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 57
Total Cats: 6
From: College Station/Bryan
Default

Originally Posted by 18psi
To address the cooling system

a coolant re-route
possibly a better than stock radiator too
everything shrouded tightly

The list grows because you mentioned the words "track" and "reliably"

Those 2 key words make a very short list become a very long one

I have had good luck at the track all last year with no heat related issues cept for blown Heater core hose. I'm working on coolant reroute already to keep #4 happy.
Old Apr 11, 2013 | 05:16 PM
  #26  
hornetball's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 6,301
Total Cats: 697
From: Granbury, TX
Default

If you are keeping the engine stockish, I don't know that you NEED new fuel injectors. The stockers have some room to play, although your car will run better with a more modern design.

In any case, my bigger concern is the upcoming MS learning curve. If you keep your stock injectors, you can use the MSPNP base map while you come up to speed a bit. Swap the injectors and mess with "Req. Fuel" as a second step rather than doing both at once.

0.02.
Old Apr 11, 2013 | 09:00 PM
  #27  
t2couger's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 57
Total Cats: 6
From: College Station/Bryan
Default

Originally Posted by hornetball
If you are keeping the engine stockish, I don't know that you NEED new fuel injectors. The stockers have some room to play, although your car will run better with a more modern design.

In any case, my bigger concern is the upcoming MS learning curve. If you keep your stock injectors, you can use the MSPNP base map while you come up to speed a bit. Swap the injectors and mess with "Req. Fuel" as a second step rather than doing both at once.

0.02.

That is actually not a bad idea thanks for the input.
Old Mar 31, 2014 | 06:02 PM
  #28  
t2couger's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 57
Total Cats: 6
From: College Station/Bryan
Default

Same dyno as before This is the same car as before with MS3 tuned by me on the road. full exhaust and intake. That's it.

Attached Thumbnails 1.6L Stock? Dyno results-dyno.jpg  
Old Apr 1, 2014 | 05:08 PM
  #29  
hornetball's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 6,301
Total Cats: 697
From: Granbury, TX
Default

20 honest HP gain on a normally aspirated 1.6. Nice!
Old Apr 1, 2014 | 05:44 PM
  #30  
Chilicharger665's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,694
Total Cats: 67
From: SE NM
Default

Props added for doing it right and apparently doing it well enough to gain 20 hp!
Old Apr 1, 2014 | 07:31 PM
  #31  
greddygalant's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 771
Total Cats: 39
From: Beaverton, OR
Default

Nice numbers, what does your afr target table look like if you dont mind posting.
Old Apr 1, 2014 | 08:15 PM
  #32  
Fireindc's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,704
Total Cats: 904
From: Taos, New mexico
Default

Nice man! I was genuinely surprised to see you took our advice and applied it to your car.
Old Apr 2, 2014 | 12:04 AM
  #33  
Twodoor's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 628
Total Cats: 44
From: Meridian, Mississippi
Default

And THIS is why any time someone asks "what should I do about" with anything A/F related we say "engine management" instead of bandaids! An honest 6 lb/ft of torque and 18 HP gained. You aren't getting that from a fuel pressure regulator!

Great to see someone listen to good advice and then post up the results

Keith
Old Apr 2, 2014 | 05:53 PM
  #34  
t2couger's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 57
Total Cats: 6
From: College Station/Bryan
Default

Originally Posted by greddygalant
Nice numbers, what does your afr target table look like if you dont mind posting.
Im not going to pretend this is perfect but it is putting me around 13.1-12.9 when on the track under full WOT. Around town it is great and same on the highway. I have track video to back this up if interested cam can see AFR gauge. There is still plenty of fine tuning i can do if i had the time/will.

Attached Thumbnails 1.6L Stock? Dyno results-untitled.jpg  
Old Apr 2, 2014 | 10:00 PM
  #35  
hornetball's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 6,301
Total Cats: 697
From: Granbury, TX
Default

Since you are normally aspirated, you should rescale your tables to top out at 105 or 110 kPa. That will double your resolution. As currently configured, half your table is wasted.
Old Apr 3, 2014 | 09:46 AM
  #36  
t2couger's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 57
Total Cats: 6
From: College Station/Bryan
Default

Originally Posted by hornetball
Since you are normally aspirated, you should rescale your tables to top out at 105 or 110 kPa. That will double your resolution. As currently configured, half your table is wasted.
I didn't even know i could do that thanks for the tip.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Full_Tilt_Boogie
Build Threads
84
Apr 12, 2021 04:21 PM
Rick02R
WTB
3
Jan 3, 2016 07:18 PM
tazswing
Race Prep
20
Oct 3, 2015 11:04 AM
Trent
WTB
2
Oct 1, 2015 12:15 PM
The Gleas
MEGAsquirt
3
Oct 1, 2015 09:30 AM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:32 PM.