Notices
Engine Performance This section is for discussion on all engine building related questions.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: KPower

Because CNC

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 23, 2014 | 11:45 PM
  #221  
EO2K's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 10,477
Total Cats: 1,924
From: Very NorCal
Default

Fear not, its like a 2~3 hour job to put the rotrex back on the thing.

I'm sure John installs them on accident while sleepwalking.
Old Dec 24, 2014 | 12:22 AM
  #222  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

wow, that plot out of n/a BP is nuts. even some supercharged guys have less power and torque than that

....some serious VTAK action going on at 3700
Old Dec 24, 2014 | 01:35 AM
  #223  
guttedmiata's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 440
Total Cats: 3
Default

Originally Posted by 18psi
wow, that plot out of n/a BP is nuts. even some supercharged guys have less power and torque than that
Let's play nice now...
Old Dec 24, 2014 | 03:12 AM
  #224  
codrus's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,285
Total Cats: 883
From: Santa Clara, CA
Default

Originally Posted by emilio700
Manley rods
I'm curious why Manleys instead of the A beam Carrillos, since it seems like you're unlikely to need the 600hp rating on an N/A motor? Is the 100 grams of weight reduction each just not worth the cost?

--Ian
Old Dec 24, 2014 | 09:45 AM
  #225  
Midtenn's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,195
Total Cats: 310
From: Murfreesboro,TN
Default

Its amazing how far you're been able to stretch the BP especially in a reasonably affordable manor (based on the $8k estimate on Facebook). At $8k, it makes the K swap a little more temping for those of us who are constant tinkers. If you want a set it and forget it motor setup and are bound by rules to us a BP, this would be a great recipe. Thank you for giving us so many options for getting to more potential out of an affordable platform.
Old Dec 24, 2014 | 10:47 AM
  #226  
ctdrftna's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,146
Total Cats: 56
From: Cromwell CT
Default

Yeah this really put into perspective how economical the k swap is if staying all motor. The stock k24a2 would put those numbers to shame for the same price. But still sick power for a mid compression all motor BP.
Old Dec 24, 2014 | 10:54 AM
  #227  
Efini~FC3S's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,317
Total Cats: 99
From: Charlotte, NC
Default

Originally Posted by 18psi
wow, that plot out of n/a BP is nuts. even some supercharged guys have less power and torque than that

....some serious VTAK action going on at 3700
Lolz, beat me to it.

I was going to ask if the VTEC switch over was 3600 or 3700rpm?
Old Dec 24, 2014 | 12:07 PM
  #228  
emilio700's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 7,622
Total Cats: 2,619
Default

Originally Posted by codrus
I'm curious why Manleys instead of the A beam Carrillos, since it seems like you're unlikely to need the 600hp rating on an N/A motor? Is the 100 grams of weight reduction each just not worth the cost?

--Ian
This a repurposed bottom end I bought from a friend. He had a local guy (Advanced Engine Dynamix) build it. They put the thrust bearing in backwards and honed it wrong. It ate itself so we tore it down. Head was junck so we threw it in the trash. Bottom end was salvageable, thus the Manley rods. I think they are actually JE pistons with some lower tension rings than we normally use. I would use a bigger ST with more compression and Carrillo A's as you suggested.

Originally Posted by ctdrftna
Yeah this really put into perspective how economical the k swap is if staying all motor. The stock k24a2 would put those numbers to shame for the same price. But still sick power for a mid compression all motor BP.
I'll cut/paste something I posted on anther forum:

This is easily a 100hr motor. Fair to make comparisons. The Rotrex + BP combo is the value leader by far when it comes to making power.Take your existing $2500 I/H/E + ECU and add a $4000 Jackson Racing Rotrex kit for 350whp. Done for $6500. Want it to last, add another $3000 for a built long block and run a bit more boost for 400whp @ $10k.

The K swao comes into is own if you are staying N/A and want over 200whp. That can be done for $9-10K.

This 180whp E85 N/A build could be done cheaper. Starting with a bone stock Miata, probably $9K and you would make about 190whp.


K swaps are cost effective as long as you stick with a junkyard long block and are staying N/A. Outside of that a Rotrex +BP makes more power per dollar at anything above about 180whp.

But yeah, milking the last few hp out of a BP has never been cost effective but it does make for a 100hr track motor.
__________________


www.facebook.com/SuperMiata

949RACING.COM Home of the 6UL wheel

.33 SNR
Old Dec 24, 2014 | 05:16 PM
  #229  
ctdrftna's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,146
Total Cats: 56
From: Cromwell CT
Default

Yeah i don't mean to take anything away from what you have done for the BP at all. Your the only one i see really developing the engine.
Old Dec 24, 2014 | 07:08 PM
  #230  
k24madness's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,421
Total Cats: 95
From: San Rafael, CA
Default

I am more impressed by the average HP of about 176-178 from 6,500 to 8,000 than the peak of 180. Having that kinda power on tap through the entire rev range is what wins races.
Old Dec 29, 2014 | 11:59 AM
  #231  
noname4me's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 138
Total Cats: 5
Default

Hi,
1) Looks like the engine had a flat top intake manifold for the dyno pull? (I don't see that in your parts list.)

2) What would be the impact to HP staying with the OEM cams? The cost of the aftermarket cams is a significant % of the total cost for a BP6D build. This looks like a place to decrease the overall build cost upfront, but fairly easy to add the cams at a later date.

Thank you
Old Dec 29, 2014 | 01:42 PM
  #232  
my97miata's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 135
Total Cats: -52
From: Tampa, Florida
Default

According to the professionals, using the VICS(US 99-00 and MSM intake manifold) is suppose to increase the midrange torque but takes away from the top end horsepower. The 99-00 intake manifold would probably be better for an autocross and a street car than a car that is being used on a race track.
Old Dec 29, 2014 | 01:43 PM
  #233  
emilio700's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 7,622
Total Cats: 2,619
Default

Originally Posted by noname4me
Hi,
1) Looks like the engine had a flat top intake manifold for the dyno pull? (I don't see that in your parts list.)

2) What would be the impact to HP staying with the OEM cams? The cost of the aftermarket cams is a significant % of the total cost for a BP6D build. This looks like a place to decrease the overall build cost upfront, but fairly easy to add the cams at a later date.

Thank you
Square top, yes. Cams might be worth 12whp. We have never done a direct A/B test for that so I'm guessing based on a bunch of different data points. Our record power on stock cams was 174whp with a slightly higher compression 2.0L. That was an expensive engine though. Dialed back with a simpler build, 160whp is reasonable with a good valve job on BP6D cams with 85.5mm pistons on gas.
__________________


www.facebook.com/SuperMiata

949RACING.COM Home of the 6UL wheel

.33 SNR
Old Dec 29, 2014 | 02:27 PM
  #234  
emilio700's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 7,622
Total Cats: 2,619
Default

Originally Posted by my97miata
According to the professionals, using the VICS(US 99-00 and MSM intake manifold) is suppose to increase the midrange torque but takes away from the top end horsepower. The 99-00 intake manifold would probably be better for an autocross and a street car than a car that is being used on a race track.
Generally, yes. If you need to detune for a power limited class then the NB1 manifold with VICS enabled is the best bet. Our best PTE motor used that manifold for the most torques.
__________________


www.facebook.com/SuperMiata

949RACING.COM Home of the 6UL wheel

.33 SNR
Old Dec 30, 2014 | 08:36 AM
  #235  
my97miata's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 135
Total Cats: -52
From: Tampa, Florida
Default

Originally Posted by emilio700
Generally, yes. If you need to detune for a power limited class then the NB1 manifold with VICS enabled is the best bet. Our best PTE motor used that manifold for the most torques.
Sounds like the VICS manifold is money well spent, for a street car.
Old Dec 31, 2014 | 06:16 AM
  #236  
richyvrlimited's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,642
Total Cats: 42
From: Warrington/Birmingham
Default

Originally Posted by Leafy
All 01+ motors have vtcs msm or vvt. Only the 99-00 has vics.
In the USDM maybe

JDM and EUDM 01+ cars have neither VICS or VTCS.
Old Dec 31, 2014 | 08:00 PM
  #237  
newold_m's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 109
Total Cats: 6
From: San Jose, CA
Default

Helping a local friend install the CNC head on his NB this weekend. Can't wait to see this bad boy in person..
Old Jan 1, 2015 | 08:55 PM
  #238  
triple88a's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 10,522
Total Cats: 1,830
From: Chicago, IL
Default

I keep hoping for the hydraulic lifters to be come available. Like those from the koenigsegg free valves
Old Jan 1, 2015 | 09:21 PM
  #239  
EO2K's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 10,477
Total Cats: 1,924
From: Very NorCal
Default

Originally Posted by newold_m
Helping a local friend install the CNC head on his NB this weekend. Can't wait to see this bad boy in person..
I'm glad to hear I'm not the only one in the area who bought one. Is said "friend" here on MT? Maybe NCR? More hard data is always a good thing.

Related: I'm glad this thread got a bit o'cleanup, thanks mods
Old Jan 1, 2015 | 10:13 PM
  #240  
newold_m's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 109
Total Cats: 6
From: San Jose, CA
Default

Originally Posted by EO2K
I'm glad to hear I'm not the only one in the area who bought one. Is said "friend" here on MT? Maybe NCR? More hard data is always a good thing.

Related: I'm glad this thread got a bit o'cleanup, thanks mods
I don't think he's here even though he also has a sweet turbo NA. CNC head is going into his NB1 and not sure if his head is 4W or 6D. I've seen some posts from him on NCR but he's primarily on BAMD.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:22 AM.