Notices
Engine Performance This section is for discussion on all engine building related questions.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: KPower

which is the better base engine? oem 1600 or bpt1800 ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 28, 2011 | 02:38 PM
  #1  
3barboost's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 109
Total Cats: 0
From: Johannesburg, South Africa
Default which is the better base engine? oem 1600 or bpt1800 ?

Ok so I have bought into and taken over another project and am looking for some insight into whats the best base engine to start with - heres what came with the car - which was going to be built as a 12.5:1 compression na screamer

1 x oem 1600cc engine - complete with everything but the exhaust manifold but in a lot of pieces however

1 x bpt 1800cc block with crank
1 x bpt head (with the funkychicken dog leg gurney tab on the intake port)
1 x bp head (na)
1 x set of oem bp pistons ceramic coated
1 x set of eagle rods for a honda - they 1.5mm longer than the mazda rods
1 x set of oem mazda rods for bp 1800 na motor
new bearings / gaskets / arp stud kit / mains bolts etc etc
1 x new sump and pickup for bp1800 for rwd
1 x intake manifold for bp1800 that points the right way

is it better to simply turbo the oem 1600cc ?
or what combo on the bp 1800 do i choose ?
or do i just go buy a complete bpt1800 motor ?
there is no engine in the car just a pile of bits and i have no idea if everything is useable - I would hate to get 90% of the way through the bpt build and find out the water pump / cam tensioner is useless or some obscure part is actually missing etc etc

the base car is a 1991 with a 1800 lsd swap / rebuilt gearbox
the goal would be 250whp, with intercooler / fuel pump / bigger injectors / ecu
Old Dec 28, 2011 | 03:05 PM
  #2  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,541
Total Cats: 4,364
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

the 1.8L x 99999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999 999999999999999999999

preferably the VVT motor.


There's nothing good about the 1.6L despite the placebo effect of it "revving" better.
Old Dec 28, 2011 | 03:19 PM
  #3  
dustinb's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,321
Total Cats: 14
From: Victoria, BC
Default

The 1.8 all the way. I was very pleased when I swapped all my 1.6 stuff for 1.8.
Old Dec 28, 2011 | 03:24 PM
  #4  
3barboost's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 109
Total Cats: 0
From: Johannesburg, South Africa
Default

hmmm so 1800 gets the vote - neither of the heads i have are vvt heads - these 1800 engines here are labelled bp / bpt 1800 by the jap yards - i think they come out of the gtx 323 / familia they have the black tappet cover with ridges on them - does this change anything ?
Old Dec 28, 2011 | 04:06 PM
  #5  
miata2fast's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,145
Total Cats: 175
From: Dover, FL
Default

I am not 100% sure if there is a difference between the 323 head and the 94 - 97 Miata head. I want to say the early 1.8 Miata head is better, and heads from 99 and up (US) are vastly superior. VVTs are the best if you do not plan to run a monster camshaft from what I have learned.

Edit: When I say 99 and up (US), I mean we do not have a 98 Model. Your 98 model (if you have one) may have the better flowing head. Can't remember how they did it overseas.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Full_Tilt_Boogie
Build Threads
84
Apr 12, 2021 04:21 PM
90 Turbo
MEGAsquirt
19
Oct 19, 2015 03:23 PM
tazswing
Race Prep
20
Oct 3, 2015 11:04 AM
The Gleas
MEGAsquirt
3
Oct 1, 2015 09:30 AM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:04 AM.