Engine Performance This section is for discussion on all engine building related questions.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: KPower

E85 with stock VVT NB2

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-29-2017, 11:34 AM
  #21  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
 
bbundy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Anacortes, WA
Posts: 2,478
Total Cats: 144
Default

Originally Posted by hector
We are making over 130wtq and 150whp with e78 at 90% injector duty cycle on 01 injectors that were cleaned before install and a regulator from a NB at the rail. It made about +7 tq and hp at the wheels on corn. AFR's in the low to mid 13's seemed best as measured on the cars wbo2. This is uncorrected to uncorrected comparison on same dyno. The engine ecu was changed between the switch to corn so that may have had an impact and I suspect it did.
This sounds about right. We got very little gains in the rpm range before running out of injector by getting the Afr diled in for E85. Timing wise if we ran either more or less timing than we optimized for gas it made less power. It wanted the same exact timing. The gains were small though under 5 hp/ tq in that range almost in the noise of run to run dyno variation.

Because of the very small difference it looked like was going to make we aborted throwing more money at it tring to source bigger injectors while it was on the dyno swap them out and spend another day tuning.
bbundy is offline  
Old 04-29-2017, 11:57 AM
  #22  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
 
bbundy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Anacortes, WA
Posts: 2,478
Total Cats: 144
Default

Originally Posted by emilio700
Your post was a bit misleading. It sounded like your afr's were correct and you did not make power but clearly you completely ran out of injector so you don't know if the corn would make more power or not. NB FPR on stock NB2 has just enough headroom for E85. We find it varies from car to car. Out of probably 8 cars we have set up like that, two ran out of injector. NB1 is more likely to run out of injector then in be too because of cams and slightly smaller injector.
It has NB 1 fuel system pump, regulator, lines, fuel, rail. But has NB2 injectors.
bbundy is offline  
Old 04-29-2017, 02:54 PM
  #23  
Senior Member
 
hector's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Hollywood, FL
Posts: 807
Total Cats: 163
Default

I'll be going to bigger injectors soon to find out if e98 will make any more power and of course just to have some headroom as 90% dc is just too much.

I also would like to do a CSP engine build after Nats. I told myself I have to be somewhat competitive as the extra power won't do any good if I'm 3 seconds back. Then we'll see how close I can get to Emilio's estimate of 168/140. Or is that from first-hand knowledge?
hector is offline  
Old 04-30-2017, 12:31 PM
  #24  
Junior Member
 
cabowabo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Bama
Posts: 463
Total Cats: 121
Default

Originally Posted by emilio700
. NA with less fuel pressure and lower flowing injectors only supports about 125~130whp on corn.
I presume you mean NA6, since NA8's can make that much on 93e10 . When I tired to tune for e85 I hit max duty cycle around 5000rpm's on my 97. AFR's would hangout around 12.8-13, but obviously the fuel was just pooling and it didn't feel right in the upper RPM's WOT. An already not smooth revving motor felt even more trucky.
cabowabo is online now  
Old 04-17-2018, 01:10 AM
  #25  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
 
bbundy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Anacortes, WA
Posts: 2,478
Total Cats: 144
Default

Thought Id update this. after switching to Deatschwerks 450cc injectors and spending more time fine tuning both for 92-pump and E85 the E85 was good for about a 7 hp gain and with across the range gains everywhere. ~157 hp 143 ft-lbs blue is E85 red is 92pump.
Attached Thumbnails E85 with stock VVT NB2-28951803_1760624017332897_5364308078916151228_n.jpg  
bbundy is offline  
Old 04-17-2018, 01:34 PM
  #26  
Senior Member
 
Stock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Las Cruces, NM
Posts: 589
Total Cats: 113
Default

Please allow my to junk up this thread for a second. On a 95 with a VVT swap, could I replicate these results with the addition of a 99+ fuel pump? The motor with have a 99-00 fuel rail and NB2 injectors - at that point is the only missing piece a newer fuel pump, or are my factory lines an issue?
Stock is offline  
Old 04-17-2018, 05:03 PM
  #27  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
 
bbundy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Anacortes, WA
Posts: 2,478
Total Cats: 144
Default

Its an NB2 VVT motor rebuilt with factory overbore and head shaved to minimum spec, with NB1 fuel system lines rail dampers regulator and all. added flex fuel sensor. 450cc injectors. Modified NB1 intake manifold with functioning VICS. few other secret sauce things that are all legal for the class.

Originally Posted by Stock
Please allow my to junk up this thread for a second. On a 95 with a VVT swap, could I replicate these results with the addition of a 99+ fuel pump? The motor with have a 99-00 fuel rail and NB2 injectors - at that point is the only missing piece a newer fuel pump, or are my factory lines an issue?
bbundy is offline  
Old 04-17-2018, 06:12 PM
  #28  
Senior Member
 
Stock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Las Cruces, NM
Posts: 589
Total Cats: 113
Default

Originally Posted by bbundy
Its an NB2 VVT motor rebuilt with factory overbore and head shaved to minimum spec, with NB1 fuel system lines rail dampers regulator and all. added flex fuel sensor. 450cc injectors. Modified NB1 intake manifold with functioning VICS. few other secret sauce things that are all legal for the class.
Sorry, I guess I wasn't referring so much to the numbers but to the notion that the NB1/2 fuel lines were an integral part of the "E85 on a 'stock' fuel system formula."
Stock is offline  
Old 04-17-2018, 06:38 PM
  #29  
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
concealer404's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,917
Total Cats: 2,201
Default

Lines are fine, pressure @ injectors is different. USDM NB1/2 is 60psi non-reference. NA is 43.5 referenced. So, NB2 injectors + some way to run 60psi fuel system at WOT = probably G2G.
concealer404 is offline  
Old 04-17-2018, 08:27 PM
  #30  
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Arca_ex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Chandler, AZ
Posts: 1,628
Total Cats: 428
Default

Originally Posted by Stock
Sorry, I guess I wasn't referring so much to the numbers but to the notion that the NB1/2 fuel lines were an integral part of the "E85 on a 'stock' fuel system formula."
One of these kits:
https://supermiata.com/Walbro-190LPH-HP-Fuel-Pump.aspx

And an external adjustable fuel pressure regulator (Turbosmart actually makes a really good unit) and you can hit pretty much any power that a reasonable N/A Miata engine is capable of.
Arca_ex is offline  
Old 04-17-2018, 08:33 PM
  #31  
Elite Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Stealth97's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Canton, Ga
Posts: 2,156
Total Cats: 66
Default

I’m finding that my “street”motor with NB injectors and 60psi won’t have quite enough fuel for e85. I imagine that others will run into the same with anything better than a stock engine
Stealth97 is offline  
Old 04-18-2018, 06:35 AM
  #32  
Senior Member
 
hector's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Hollywood, FL
Posts: 807
Total Cats: 163
Default

We were seeing 92% dc on a stock junkyard un-opened VVT engine on ~E80. That engine was making 132wtq, 155whp. That was with a factory pump, lines and rail from a 95 and regulator and injectors from a NB.
hector is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
EpicOtter
ECUs and Tuning
9
05-31-2016 01:35 PM
Miniae86
WTB
8
04-15-2016 12:34 PM
jamesr242
Miata parts for sale/trade
11
04-14-2016 11:53 AM
porkchop
ECUs and Tuning
7
04-07-2016 11:47 AM
frvnk
ECUs and Tuning
1
04-06-2016 10:35 PM



Quick Reply: E85 with stock VVT NB2



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:56 PM.