Notices
Engine Performance This section is for discussion on all engine building related questions.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: KPower

Early 1.8 intake manifold vs 01+ intake manifold?????

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 26, 2010 | 06:08 PM
  #21  
Faeflora's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 8,682
Total Cats: 130
From: Los Angeles, CA
Default

Originally Posted by Full_Tilt_Boogie
I think he means removing the VTCS butterflies, not gutting the plenum.
Im not sure what all goes into it but it may be possible to pull those suckers out of there and JB weld up the throttle shaft holes.
FWIW I have a ****** gutted 01+ plenum in my GF's dad's trailer. Who wants me to do a back to back test! Yay! ****, I will do a whole intake manifold shootout on my own dime if you bitches send me them to test.

Hmm starting new thread
Old Jul 26, 2010 | 06:12 PM
  #22  
ismael_pt's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 341
Total Cats: 2
From: Granada, Spain
Default

Originally Posted by faeflora
FWIW I have a ****** gutted 01+ plenum in my GF's dad's trailer. Who wants me to do a back to back test! Yay! ****, I will do a whole intake manifold shootout on my own dime if you bitches send me them to test.

Hmm starting new thread
Does it looks like your frame rail?
Old Jul 26, 2010 | 06:15 PM
  #23  
RotorNutFD3S's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,522
Total Cats: 36
From: Newnan, GA
Default

lulz

Old Jul 26, 2010 | 06:23 PM
  #24  
Faeflora's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 8,682
Total Cats: 130
From: Los Angeles, CA
Default

Originally Posted by ismael_pt
Does it looks like your frame rail?
My frame rail fucked your dad for breakfast. I can post hot pics of intake if you want.
Old Jul 26, 2010 | 11:22 PM
  #25  
Aricjm15's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 407
Total Cats: 2
From: Grayslake IL
Default

Originally Posted by faeflora
My frame rail fucked your dad for breakfast. I can post hot pics of intake if you want.
rule 34 on your frame rail?
Old Jul 27, 2010 | 01:56 AM
  #26  
bbundy's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,502
Total Cats: 146
From: Anacortes, WA
Default

Some pics of my modified 94 manifold.

Bob
Attached Thumbnails Early 1.8 intake manifold vs 01+ intake manifold?????-p3090011.jpg   Early 1.8 intake manifold vs 01+ intake manifold?????-p3090013.jpg   Early 1.8 intake manifold vs 01+ intake manifold?????-p3090017.jpg   Early 1.8 intake manifold vs 01+ intake manifold?????-p3090019.jpg   Early 1.8 intake manifold vs 01+ intake manifold?????-p3110004.jpg  

Old Jul 27, 2010 | 07:12 AM
  #27  
Doppelgänger's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 6,850
Total Cats: 71
From: Charlotte, NC
Default

Interesting...def. loks like something I'd like to try. How much did the EGR equipment impede into the plenum? Looks like a much better flow over the NB IM.
Old Jul 27, 2010 | 11:37 AM
  #28  
bbundy's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,502
Total Cats: 146
From: Anacortes, WA
Default

Originally Posted by Doppelgänger
Interesting...def. loks like something I'd like to try. How much did the EGR equipment impede into the plenum? Looks like a much better flow over the NB IM.
I don’t think the EGR created much impedance to flow but it had to create some. It had a little hump right after the throttle body to create a disturbance for better mixing of the EGR gas. I was sort of conscerned the little hump might actually improve flow by creating a swirl but I decided to take it out anyway. My car started out as a 90 so it didn’t have EGR originally.

I suspect my manifold performs similar to some of the Honda setups, but with slightly longer runners. Seems like to me the short runners would be more tuned to RPM’s beyond where a Miata motor happily runs.

Bob
Old Jul 27, 2010 | 11:53 AM
  #29  
leatherface24's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,064
Total Cats: 10
From: Pembroke Pines
Default

This is the intake mani I wanna use badly

http://performanceparts.com/part.php?partID=320138



"The "Performer X" series of intake manifolds from Edelbrock are an ideal choice for high performance street or strip applications that have peak torque and horsepower bands in the 4500-8200 rpm range."
Old Jul 27, 2010 | 12:05 PM
  #30  
bbundy's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,502
Total Cats: 146
From: Anacortes, WA
Default

Originally Posted by leatherface24
This is the intake mani I wanna use badly

http://performanceparts.com/part.php?partID=320138



"The "Performer X" series of intake manifolds from Edelbrock are an ideal choice for high performance street or strip applications that have peak torque and horsepower bands in the 4500-8200 rpm range."
Interesting that my torque hump is more 3800 to 6000 rpm. Start loosing torque pretty rapidly at 7200. This is with a 2.0L stoker with all the Flyin Miata bells and wistles and a 99 head.

I don’t think it is the intake manifold that is the primary source for the torqe drop at high RPM though.

Bob
Old Jul 27, 2010 | 12:06 PM
  #31  
levnubhin's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 7,329
Total Cats: 12
From: Va Beach
Default

Originally Posted by leatherface24
This is the intake mani I wanna use badly

http://performanceparts.com/part.php?partID=320138



"The "Performer X" series of intake manifolds from Edelbrock are an ideal choice for high performance street or strip applications that have peak torque and horsepower bands in the 4500-8200 rpm range."
Because you are fail and don't listen to people who are win.
__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote
Old Jul 27, 2010 | 12:48 PM
  #32  
Faeflora's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 8,682
Total Cats: 130
From: Los Angeles, CA
Default

Originally Posted by bbundy

I don’t think it is the intake manifold that is the primary source for the torqe drop at high RPM though.

Bob
What do you think is the primary source?
Old Jul 27, 2010 | 12:51 PM
  #33  
bbundy's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,502
Total Cats: 146
From: Anacortes, WA
Default

Originally Posted by faeflora
What do you think is the primary source?
probably cams Im guessing.

Bob
Old Jul 27, 2010 | 01:01 PM
  #34  
TURNS101's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 715
Total Cats: 5
Default

Bob, what you did with that intake is great.

I have had this question in my mind for a while.

Those pics def mad me feel like that IM is much better than my current 99gutted set up.

I may look into that after the Vegas event in a few weeks.

I am also interested in the new BEGI intake..
Old Jul 27, 2010 | 03:33 PM
  #35  
fooger03's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,149
Total Cats: 230
From: Columbus, OH
Default

Originally Posted by bbundy
probably cams Im guessing.

Bob
And a head that is generally poor flowing when the cams are open.
Old Jul 27, 2010 | 04:38 PM
  #36  
bbundy's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,502
Total Cats: 146
From: Anacortes, WA
Default

Originally Posted by fooger03
And a head that is generally poor flowing when the cams are open.
Yea I think it is a combo of the two.

The strong point of the Mazda BP engine compared to a Honda is mid range torque It is simply different than a 9000 rpm Honda. Putting a 9000 rpm Honda intake manifold on a Mazda head doesn’t suddenly make it flow like a Honda.

Bob
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Full_Tilt_Boogie
Build Threads
84
Apr 12, 2021 04:21 PM
tazswing
Race Prep
20
Oct 3, 2015 11:04 AM
Aroundcorner
Miata parts for sale/trade
2
Oct 1, 2015 03:20 PM
cale saurage
DIY Turbo Discussion
16
Oct 1, 2015 11:25 AM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:32 PM.