Engine Performance This section is for discussion on all engine building related questions.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: KPower

Horsepower difference

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-24-2009, 11:59 PM
  #1  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
Toddcod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Dallas
Posts: 1,829
Total Cats: 0
Default Horsepower difference

How much hp would I loose for getting the 3" metal core cat compared to no cat?
Toddcod is offline  
Old 02-25-2009, 12:11 AM
  #2  
Junior Member
 
matttheniceguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Vancouver Canada
Posts: 104
Total Cats: 0
Default

How much HP do you have now? Unless it is a whole lot, probably nothing noticeable.
matttheniceguy is offline  
Old 02-25-2009, 12:28 AM
  #3  
Elite Member
iTrader: (16)
 
patsmx5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 9,295
Total Cats: 476
Default

It depends. Probably a 3-7% loss in peak HP, less of a loss at lower powers as there's less flow so less total resistance.
patsmx5 is offline  
Old 02-25-2009, 12:50 AM
  #4  
Elite Member
iTrader: (33)
 
RotorNutFD3S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Newnan, GA
Posts: 2,518
Total Cats: 30
Default

Pat's on the right track, here's a good read from the EvolutionM forums: Test Pipe VS 130 cell MS high-flow cat - evolutionm.net
RotorNutFD3S is offline  
Old 02-25-2009, 09:22 AM
  #5  
Elite Member
iTrader: (5)
 
m2cupcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 7,486
Total Cats: 372
Default

^ the chart in that link (good one) is an eye opener.

And the number of cells dictates flow and emissions effectiveness. It's a give and take.
m2cupcar is offline  
Old 02-25-2009, 09:33 AM
  #6  
Tour de Franzia
iTrader: (6)
 
hustler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Republic of Dallas
Posts: 29,085
Total Cats: 375
Default

Originally Posted by RotorNutFD3S
Pat's on the right track, here's a good read from the EvolutionM forums: Test Pipe VS 130 cell MS high-flow cat - evolutionm.net
however, he didn't build boost any sooner. Hmmmm...this changes plans for me significantly. Now I'm back to "jocking" the sheet-metal intake idea.
hustler is offline  
Old 02-25-2009, 10:51 AM
  #7  
Former Vendor
 
Stephanie Turner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Bell Tuning & Performance
Posts: 1,337
Total Cats: -99
Default

Probably about 5 - 10 hp. Those were the differences when we measured it on an MSM, but it was also a 2.75" CAT.
Stephanie
Stephanie Turner is offline  
Old 02-26-2009, 06:15 PM
  #8  
Junior Member
 
matttheniceguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Vancouver Canada
Posts: 104
Total Cats: 0
Default

I wonder what the flow rating on the CAT in that graph was. As you can clearly see that CAT has no impact at all on power, untill you go beyond a certian exhaust flow and it starts to create meaningfull backpressure. If that exact CAT were used on a miata, most of us would never see a difference between it and a test pipe, because most of us are below 300whp. If you go beyond that the CAT is undersized and starts to impact performance, like it did in that test.
matttheniceguy is offline  
Old 02-26-2009, 06:34 PM
  #9  
Elite Member
iTrader: (13)
 
cueball1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Tigard, Oregon
Posts: 3,875
Total Cats: 2
Default

That is very interesting and great info to learn from. Cat's not a problem when tuned until it basically hits the wall in it's ability to flow. Would be interesting to see what happens with the 100 cell or going to a larger cat (4"?) in that evo's system.

I love that they call it a "stock" evo. Look at the mod list! It ain't stock. I'm not so impressed by the 360 hp with this list of mods.

WORKS throttle body
WORKS 76mm DP
WORKS 3in TB exhaust
Cosworth 272 IX cams
HKS exhaust adjustable cam gear
SAMCO IC hoses
Nisei LICP
Denso 720cc Injectors
GM solenoid
Perrin FMIC
Hyperforce System
RRE rally cat
GST SuperDuperDefcon5 open air filter
Titek tubular 02 housing
Ported stock exhaust manifold
Ported and coated hotside
ARP head studs
FP actuator
Stock evo 9 turbo (ported)
cueball1 is offline  
Old 02-26-2009, 06:40 PM
  #10  
Elite Member
iTrader: (16)
 
patsmx5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 9,295
Total Cats: 476
Default

Originally Posted by hustler
however, he didn't build boost any sooner. Hmmmm...this changes plans for me significantly. Now I'm back to "jocking" the sheet-metal intake idea.
Bigger turbine's operate at lower delta P's, so any back pressure causes a larger change in work output to drive the compressor vs. a smaller turbine.

IE- a GT2554 might operate the high side of the exhaust at 30 PSI to run 15 PSI of boost to the intake manifold. Assume that's with an open down pipe. In this case if the cat causes 2 PSI of back pressure then the wastegate has to close a bit more, brining pre-turbine pressure up ~2 PSI higher to to ~32 PSI to keep the same delta P across the turbine. That's only about a 7% increase in back pressure pre-turbine though.

But say you're running a GT2876 or whatever you use and you're running 11 PSI of boost and making the same power/ same mass flow rate through the exhaust. Say your running 11 PSI of boost and 23 PSI pressure pre-turbine. If you add in a cat that has a 2 PSI pressure drop, it will add ~2 PSI to the pre-turbine pressure to maintain the original 23 PSI delta, which is ~ 9% increase in back pressure. If I had to guess, the the GT2554 setup will see less HP drop adding a cat then a larger turbo setup.
patsmx5 is offline  
Old 03-19-2009, 06:19 PM
  #11  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
Toddcod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Dallas
Posts: 1,829
Total Cats: 0
Default

Well, I Went with the Reasonator Test Pipe.

I just got the the reasonator test pipe in today from enthuza! I can't wait to get home.

I bet it is going to sound sweet!
Toddcod is offline  
Old 06-08-2011, 08:43 AM
  #12  
Elite Member
 
Laur3ns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Enschede, NL
Posts: 2,053
Total Cats: 12
Default

Originally Posted by m2cupcar
^ the chart in that link (good one) is an eye opener.


And I wonder how much difference a 200 cell version makes (even more restriction?) when the core is loose in the housing - such as in my case. I now fitted a test pipe and will re-dyno soon.
Laur3ns is offline  
Old 06-08-2011, 10:28 AM
  #13  
Tour de Franzia
iTrader: (6)
 
hustler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Republic of Dallas
Posts: 29,085
Total Cats: 375
Default

I pulled my "bullet" cat a year ago and went .3-leaner in open-loop. I don't know how big of a change that is in output, but it probably wasn't worth the money to make the pipe. It also got louder, but considering it's a track car I'm less likely to cook the cat with fuel.
hustler is offline  
Old 06-08-2011, 11:52 AM
  #14  
Elite Member
 
Laur3ns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Enschede, NL
Posts: 2,053
Total Cats: 12
Default

Originally Posted by hustler
I pulled my "bullet" cat a year ago and went .3-leaner in open-loop. I don't know how big of a change that is in output, but it probably wasn't worth the money to make the pipe. It also got louder, but considering it's a track car I'm less likely to cook the cat with fuel.
I'm not leaner but fatter at idle at least. Prolly due to replacing the tired oem fp with a Walbo 255lph HP at the same time.
Laur3ns is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
d k
Race Prep
12
03-14-2018 06:33 PM
Frank_and_Beans
Supercharger Discussion
13
09-12-2016 08:17 PM
patsmx5
General Miata Chat
46
06-06-2016 10:27 AM
nbdooey
Miata parts for sale/trade
0
09-28-2015 08:46 PM
EErockMiata
MEGAsquirt
6
09-24-2015 09:49 AM



Quick Reply: Horsepower difference



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:33 AM.