Notices
Engine Performance This section is for discussion on all engine building related questions.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: KPower

MAF swap

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 23, 2013 | 02:35 PM
  #41  
concealer404's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,917
Total Cats: 2,206
Default

Originally Posted by mitchellrg
The only dumb question is the one not asked for fear of ridicule.

I am a newb but I refuse to believe that all mods have been tried. Sure, there is a generic tried and true method to everything we do. I just like to explore other options so I ask folks like you who have alot more experiance and knowledge in the area. From the good and bad responses I have recieved I know I can put the idea to rest.

No, I do not plan on a turbo. My plan ... one day ... if it will fit ... is the 3.7v6 out the current mustang. The whole motor only weighs 20lbs more than the 1.8, but that will be after my 1.8 fails or I kill it trying to do some DUMB mod that I didnt ask question about.

You don't even plan on doing engine swaps the correct way. Everything you want to do is half-assed.

Piggyback and Maf swap to get almost-kindof-sortof-not-really to a standalone...

Motor swap that's missing two cylinders...

Racelands instead of a suspension worth a ****...
Old Jul 23, 2013 | 02:54 PM
  #42  
mitchellrg's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newb
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 31
Total Cats: -12
Default

Please kill this thread as my feeling are so hurt I will simply burry my head in the sand, sell my miata and jump off a cliff. Oh wait, just kill the thread please.
Reply
Leave a poscat -1 Leave a negcat
Old Jul 23, 2013 | 02:56 PM
  #43  
concealer404's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,917
Total Cats: 2,206
Default

Help me help you.
Old Jul 23, 2013 | 03:16 PM
  #44  
dieselmiata's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,356
Total Cats: 154
From: Volo, IL
Default

No intentions of going turbo.

Joins Miataturbo for advice.




Too soon?
Attached Thumbnails MAF swap-eggplants101444394_zpse86a2b9c.jpg  
Old Jul 23, 2013 | 09:06 PM
  #45  
Vilko's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 111
Total Cats: 8
Default

Welcome to miataturbo, the only car forum where "haters gonna hate" is not a valid argument!
Old Jul 23, 2013 | 09:32 PM
  #46  
FRT_Fun's Avatar
I'm a terrible person
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 7,174
Total Cats: 180
From: Arizona
Default

#1 all time hater award will forever goto Scott. He is my hero. He hates even when he doesn't mean to hate.
Old Jul 23, 2013 | 09:46 PM
  #47  
dieselmiata's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,356
Total Cats: 154
From: Volo, IL
Default

I hate you for hating.
Old Jul 23, 2013 | 09:51 PM
  #48  
RussellT94's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 274
Total Cats: 24
From: Charlotte, NC
Default

MAF swap-tumblr_lubw454rbh1qfytizo1_500.jpg
Old Jul 23, 2013 | 09:52 PM
  #49  
FRT_Fun's Avatar
I'm a terrible person
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 7,174
Total Cats: 180
From: Arizona
Default

Somewhere in the world Scott is hating on something/someone right now.
Old Jul 23, 2013 | 10:01 PM
  #50  
Stealth97's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,156
Total Cats: 67
From: Canton, Ga
Default

Even 1.8 MAF is excrement. I gained 5rwhp just by removing it, and that's N/A
Old Jul 23, 2013 | 10:04 PM
  #51  
dieselmiata's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,356
Total Cats: 154
From: Volo, IL
Default

That's nothing. I gained 10RWHP just by excrementing into my MAF.
Old Jul 23, 2013 | 10:06 PM
  #52  
tpwalsh's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 191
Total Cats: 8
Default

Originally Posted by Stealth97
Even 1.8 MAF is excrement. I gained 5rwhp just by removing it, and that's N/A
'cause the 1.6 didn't have a MAF. It had an AFM. Different principles, different response curves. Also there are loads better hotwire MAFs out there than the 1.8NA's.
Old Jul 23, 2013 | 11:15 PM
  #53  
mitchellrg's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newb
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 31
Total Cats: -12
Default

Originally Posted by tpwalsh
'cause the 1.6 didn't have a MAF. It had an AFM. Different principles, different response curves. Also there are loads better hotwire MAFs out there than the 1.8NA's.
Can you list a few?
Old Jul 24, 2013 | 02:40 AM
  #54  
iantboyd's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 296
Total Cats: 7
From: Bellingham, WA
Default

*disclaimer: I agree with the trend in this thread, waste of effort and money. Get megasquirt or mod your suspension.

That being said, all the brokedicks in the protege/323/escort world "think" it is beneficial to swap the electronics out of the stock vaf(flapper box) into a vaf with a larger body. Typically from the F2/F2t powered mx6 or probes. Look up k-code hybrid for more. IMHO, any "gains" will only exist in your head.

Edit: didn't realize op had an obd-II car.

Last edited by iantboyd; Jul 24, 2013 at 10:35 AM. Reason: Correcting some mis-information.
Old Jul 24, 2013 | 04:13 AM
  #55  
codrus's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,285
Total Cats: 883
From: Santa Clara, CA
Default

Originally Posted by Stealth97
Even 1.8 MAF is excrement. I gained 5rwhp just by removing it, and that's N/A
The NA 1.8 MAF is pretty restrictive, but the NB one isn't too bad.

MAF vs Speed/Density -- in principle, MAF should be better. Instead of baking the VE of the motor into a 3d table so that you can extrapolate from MAP & RPM into a fuel amount, you just directly measure the air going in. As for why it's not more prevalent in the aftermarket, most of the downsides to Speed/Density come from a comparative lack of flexibility in dealing with changes to the motor's VE. With a factory computer that sucks because if you put a better-flowing exhaust on the engine, then suddenly the fueling is all wrong and you can't fix it. With an aftermarket computer it's still wrong, except you have a wideband so the computer can cope and then you just fix it. So S/D is cheaper and easier and doesn't have a major downside, so why use MAF?

People who tune cars with reprogrammable factory computers and factory MAF sensors often stick with the MAF sensor.

--Ian
Old Jul 24, 2013 | 04:33 AM
  #56  
codrus's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,285
Total Cats: 883
From: Santa Clara, CA
Default

Originally Posted by iantboyd
*disclaimer: I agree with the trend in this thread, waste of effort and money. Get megasquirt or mod your suspension.

That being said, all the brokedicks in the protege/323/escort world "think" it is beneficial to swap the electronics out of the stock vaf(flapper box) into a vaf with a larger body. Typically from the kl powered mx6 or probes. Look up k-code hybrid for more. IMHO, any "gains" will only exist in your head.
OP has a 97, so he's got a hot wire, not a flapper door.

That said, swapping to the Rx-7 flapper door on the 1.6 cars is one of the commonly accepted cheap small hp mods. Sure it was only worth a few hp, but the Rx-7 sensors were cheap and easy to get. Doesn't work on a 97 though.

The NB MAF is less restrictive, but I have no idea if it would work with a 97 ECU or not.

NA MAF:

NB MAF:


Looking on ebay, you can get a 99 MAF for $40; let's imagine that it worked right with nothing but some wiring harness hackery (possible, but unlikely) and let's say it's worth 2 hp. At $20/hp that's about the same ratio as a turbo kit. The downside is that you'll be throwing that $40 away if/when you get tired of tiny hp mods that you can't feel and go to a megasquirt. It's the same as how a header is a waste of money when you get tired of piddling little naturally aspirated mods and go with a turbo.

--Ian
Attached Thumbnails MAF swap-b6bff.jpg   MAF swap-maf-fp39-3.jpg  
Old Jul 24, 2013 | 08:22 AM
  #57  
mitchellrg's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newb
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 31
Total Cats: -12
Talking

Originally Posted by codrus
OP has a 97, so he's got a hot wire, not a flapper door.

That said, swapping to the Rx-7 flapper door on the 1.6 cars is one of the commonly accepted cheap small hp mods. Sure it was only worth a few hp, but the Rx-7 sensors were cheap and easy to get. Doesn't work on a 97 though.

The NB MAF is less restrictive, but I have no idea if it would work with a 97 ECU or not.

NA MAF:

NB MAF:


Looking on ebay, you can get a 99 MAF for $40; let's imagine that it worked right with nothing but some wiring harness hackery (possible, but unlikely) and let's say it's worth 2 hp. At $20/hp that's about the same ratio as a turbo kit. The downside is that you'll be throwing that $40 away if/when you get tired of tiny hp mods that you can't feel and go to a megasquirt. It's the same as how a header is a waste of money when you get tired of piddling little naturally aspirated mods and go with a turbo.

--Ian
Thank you. The best reply yet.
Old Jul 24, 2013 | 08:44 AM
  #58  
tpwalsh's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 191
Total Cats: 8
Default

Originally Posted by mitchellrg
Can you list a few?
I was thinking something along the lines of a 4.6L MAF



Or a Bosch MAF

Attached Thumbnails MAF swap-hfp-maf1-1.jpg   MAF swap-pic1.jpg  
Old Jul 24, 2013 | 08:45 AM
  #59  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,541
Total Cats: 4,364
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

Tell us more about spending hundreds of dollars in order to make 0.25rwhp...
Old Jul 24, 2013 | 08:52 AM
  #60  
concealer404's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,917
Total Cats: 2,206
Default

Originally Posted by iantboyd
*disclaimer: I agree with the trend in this thread, waste of effort and money. Get megasquirt or mod your suspension.

That being said, all the brokedicks in the protege/323/escort world "think" it is beneficial to swap the electronics out of the stock vaf(flapper box) into a vaf with a larger body. Typically from the kl powered mx6 or probes. Look up k-code hybrid for more. IMHO, any "gains" will only exist in your head.

That's.... not really correct at all. They're using the flapper boxes you speak of, which are not present at all in any KL car.

They're using RX7 units, and the K-code Hybrid is probably something to do with F2-powered 1st gen MX6/Probe.

The KL unit is more of a "sliding booby nipple" type deal. I personally think it's far worse than a flapper, which is probably why those guys pick up so much power with a Millenia MAF conversion.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:18 AM.