Notices
Engine Performance This section is for discussion on all engine building related questions.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: KPower

More headwork Fail questions.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 12, 2008 | 05:57 PM
  #1  
Toddcod's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,829
Total Cats: 0
From: Dallas
Default More headwork Fail questions.

Paul and everyone's 99 motors seem to be running really well.

We all know you really want to go lower compression on a build for boost. But the 99 seems to be holding up great at 9.5:1 compression ratio.

My brothers S/C car is the old style. The nose is not upgradeable. But we found away around that. The JR1.8 version had a smaller pulley. Something like 67.5mm I think. Bam 2psi. YAY!

And if we get the crank pulley 2more psi, for hopefully 8-9psi.

Head milling question

We thought about milling the head on his car some. Since he will never be high boost, we would like to gain some compression. 9.5:1 would be great, if there is enough clearance for the valves. Otherwise, whatever is safe for the valve clearance.

I know it isn't going to be crazy power, but the 99 is holding great with up to 14psi on 9.5:1

What do you think about this. Milling is cheap, and we are not going for stupid compression. Just somemore responce and low end. All for $20 milling from a family friend, gasket, and time.
Old Dec 12, 2008 | 06:00 PM
  #2  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,541
Total Cats: 4,364
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

do it.
Old Dec 12, 2008 | 06:05 PM
  #3  
hustler's Avatar
Tour de Franzia
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 29,085
Total Cats: 375
From: Republic of Dallas
Default

Considering the 1.6 was actually 8.8:1, you're not going to get 7/10 of a compression point out of milling the head. I had a head decked once and noticed no difference on the butt dyno. However, I'm a bitch.
Old Dec 12, 2008 | 06:12 PM
  #4  
mrtonyg's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 483
Total Cats: -2
From: South Florida
Default

One thing to keep in mind about milling an aluminum cylinder head is that once you remove material from head it will not be able to deal with overheating situations as well as when it is at it's normal deck thickness. Mazda recommends a new cylinder head if it is warped by more than .006".

Take it for what it's worth.


Tony
Old Dec 12, 2008 | 08:10 PM
  #5  
Toddcod's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,829
Total Cats: 0
From: Dallas
Default

Hmmm.............. We'll probably just go a head and get the crank pulley.. And save that thought for when he is tired of the new found power.

Is there a stronger material, but thinner head gasket?

Dyno's sometimes read different from week to week, and place to place. I had a GSXR1000 read 143 hp one place and 153 another. But I did think it gained some power after 7000 miles.

Hustler could you feel any difference?
Old Dec 12, 2008 | 11:00 PM
  #6  
Savington's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,106
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Default

Originally Posted by hustler
Considering the 1.6 was actually 8.8:1, you're not going to get 7/10 of a compression point out of milling the head. I had a head decked once and noticed no difference on the butt dyno. However, I'm a bitch.
The 1.6s were 9.0s. Only 94-95s had the flat-topped 8.8 pistons.
Old Dec 13, 2008 | 01:12 AM
  #7  
NA6C-Guy's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 7,930
Total Cats: 44
From: Birmingham Alabama
Default

If it were me, and I was going to have a reason to pull the head other than to mill the head, I would do it while it was off. I wouldnt remove it just for that reason though. Im quite glad I did mine though, since I think higher compression will be helpful since I only have 8.8:1, and dont plan to do over about 8-10psi on a 2554. I had .015 removed from mine, and will probably have another .005 removed when I bring it to the machine shop again to remove some minor dings in the surface from sliding it on a table top. Though a whole different animal, I had the head from a Honda Prelude milled .020 years ago, and did notice a slight seat of the pants gain(very slight, maybe). It was n/a though, making maybe 160-170whp, already at 10.5:1 if I remember correctly, so it may have gone up to upper 10's or low 11's. Not sure that you would be able to tell a thing with an over 200whp s/c car though, not likely.
Old Dec 13, 2008 | 02:10 AM
  #8  
UrbanSoot's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,667
Total Cats: 18
From: Woodland Hills, CA
Default

its useless and unsafe. dont do it.
Old Dec 13, 2008 | 02:22 AM
  #9  
NA6C-Guy's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 7,930
Total Cats: 44
From: Birmingham Alabama
Default

Originally Posted by UrbanSoot
its useless and unsafe. dont do it.
Why do you say it is unsafe?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bigmackloud
Miata parts for sale/trade
19
Jan 8, 2021 11:24 AM
Quinn
Cars for sale/trade
6
Oct 23, 2016 07:58 AM
tomiboy
Race Prep
124
Nov 2, 2015 03:55 PM
shooterschmidty
Engine Performance
8
Sep 30, 2015 10:28 PM
StratoBlue1109
Miata parts for sale/trade
7
Sep 24, 2015 03:50 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:34 AM.