Engine Performance This section is for discussion on all engine building related questions.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: KPower

NB Fuel damper conundrum

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-30-2016, 10:12 PM
  #1  
Newb
Thread Starter
 
h20boynz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 28
Total Cats: 0
Default NB Fuel damper conundrum

Hi folks...hoping someone can shine some light on my confusion:

I have a 1998 (1999 USA) NB being rebuilt for turbo. I splashed out on the FM fuel rail which is a nice bit of gear now I have it in hand.
My question relates to what I thought was supposed to be a damper on my stock fuel rail (being an NB) but looks like a FPR rather than a damper?
My unit in the picture below has a return coming out of it and a vacumn port?
Is this an NA fuel rail FPR?


Attached Thumbnails NB Fuel damper conundrum-80-img_0987_26aebdda8584b747197862e9aef53f5e0b833250.jpg   NB Fuel damper conundrum-80-img_0988_a65bae4d497e4089ac06f3813c7d901f6677f9fd.jpg  
h20boynz is offline  
Old 05-30-2016, 10:49 PM
  #2  
Newb
Thread Starter
 
h20boynz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 28
Total Cats: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Calmdown
Apparently there is/May be a variant fuel rail for the 99-01? The fpr on the front has a part number of BP5B 795300-3730. It has a return line and a feed line parked up front near the throttle body. There's a few threads on here about it, but nothing definitive.

Under a Mazda parts search, it shows the 2001-2002 moats with a 13290c pulse damper in the front. Shows the same for all of them.

Now I'm really confused. Are mk2/2.5 fuel rails the same?

I've got a 99 coming in anyway, so does it need to be a mk1 1.8 fpr, or can I use a 1.6 as well?

Just asking because I'll be calling junkyards to see what they have .
OK so found this post...thats me with the variant FPR 795300-3730!
So my plan is to run the FM fuel rail, fuel line and filter arrangement as per this:


Given I have a FPR on the rail, can I assume I do not have one in tank? Secondly, I am going to run an aftermarket FPR as per the above so should I just get the 99+ damper BP4W20180 to mount to the rail, OR should I just plug the port on the fuel rail and not worry about a damper?
Its all very new to me, sorry.
TIA
Attached Thumbnails NB Fuel damper conundrum-80-diagram1_4_64caefb17278a433364e77477a767001b01f1322.jpg  
h20boynz is offline  
Old 05-30-2016, 11:40 PM
  #3  
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Savington's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,099
Default

Euro NB1s had return-style systems. You'll need to verify this, but I believe your fuel system is basically an NA system.

Do not follow that FM schematic for the NA. Get a regulator adapter and use a 2-port FPR. Their setup basically converts it to a returnless system which is inferior.
Savington is offline  
Old 05-31-2016, 01:39 AM
  #4  
Newb
Thread Starter
 
h20boynz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 28
Total Cats: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Savington
Euro NB1s had return-style systems. You'll need to verify this, but I believe your fuel system is basically an NA system.

Do not follow that FM schematic for the NA. Get a regulator adapter and use a 2-port FPR. Their setup basically converts it to a returnless system which is inferior.
Thanks. I chatted to my mechanic today and he advised me similarly. I will run with 2 lines, separate FPR and get my hands on a stock damper to install on the FM rail.
h20boynz is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
nitrodann
Engine Performance
22
09-09-2022 05:36 PM
adamiata
Miata parts for sale/trade
2
05-31-2016 05:19 AM
2ndGearRubber
MEGAsquirt
0
05-30-2016 07:43 PM
Del
DIY Turbo Discussion
25
05-26-2016 03:28 PM
Downmented
WTB
0
05-24-2016 08:37 AM



Quick Reply: NB Fuel damper conundrum



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:20 PM.