Engine Performance This section is for discussion on all engine building related questions.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: KPower

Skunk2 vs Square/Flat Top Intake Manifold - Dyno Results

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-21-2017, 01:13 PM
  #1  
FAB
Former Vendor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
FAB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 971
Total Cats: 417
Arrow Skunk2 vs Square/Flat Top Intake Manifold - Dyno Results

There have been a few discussions recently surrounding the Skunk2 manifold and in a nut shell (feel free to correct) it's been a great competitor to the Square-top. Coming in at a similar price point, often less, I'd say it's an excellent contribution to the aftermarket support these cars have. We've shipped over 100 of these manifolds and decided it was time to fill the gaps in the results that have been posted. We're blessed to have a community that is so result driven and kudos to the guys who have also shared their findings: FM, 949 and anyone else who might have been overlooked.

Skunk2 vs Square-Top (Naturally aspirated/Same Calibration) 949 results:
Square-Top: 150.41/123.19
Skunk2: 154.71/123.29

Skunk2 vs VTCS (Turbocharged/Unknown modification to boost or calibration) FM results:
VICS: 318.5/280.2
Skunk2: 350.8/278

Skunk2 vs Square-Top (Turbocharged/Same Calibration) Fab9 results:
Square-Top: 341.8/295.4
Skunk2: 341.8/298.8

Darby continued to up the boost by 3-4 psi and was able to knock out some pretty serious numbers with an end result of 365/309 on the Skunk2 manifold but this was done after changes were made in the calibration.

Plenum spacer? We're installing one Saturday and will test again, identical boost levels and calibrations.

Bottom line: You decide, but it's my interpretation that your decision can be made easily with the information we've been able to put together here.
  • VTCS or USDM intake manifold owner (naturally aspirated) MAYBE: Buy yourself a S2 intake, you'll pick up numbers either way. If you're running any sort of FI you'll apparently see tremendous gains.
  • VTCS or USDM intake manifold owner (forced induction) ABSOLUTE YES: This seems like a no brainer, tremendous gains and it's a quick way to clean up your engine bay for internet fame. It's also nearly the same price of sourcing a EDM Square-Top.
  • Square-Top owner (naturally aspirated) MAYBE: Your call if a few ponies is worth the coin but you aren't at risk of losing anything.
Stay tuned for plenum spacer results. Cheers guys.

The dyno operator and tuner was A Star Fabrication just up the road from us. This isn't the best representation of the plot but you can see the square top results blend right along side the S2. We will try to update the thread with a better screen shot after we play with spacers.


Last edited by FAB; 12-21-2017 at 01:35 PM.
FAB is offline  
Reply
Leave a poscat 11 Leave a negcat
Old 12-21-2017, 02:40 PM
  #2  
Elite Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Erat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Detroit (the part with no rules or laws)
Posts: 5,677
Total Cats: 800
Default

Props for the post.

It should also be noted that some people were experiencing fitment issues with fuel rails. Someone will post the correct info or correct me, I can't seem to remember off the top of my head. Was it return-less NB guys? There is also a relocation of the TB inlet location, people with rigid charge pipes or reroute could have fitment issues they didn't have before.

Again, just something to keep in mind for a bottom line decision.
Erat is offline  
Old 12-21-2017, 02:58 PM
  #3  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,493
Total Cats: 4,080
Default

is the bright red plot the square or skunk2?
Braineack is offline  
Old 12-21-2017, 03:14 PM
  #4  
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Goingnowherefast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Metro Detroit, MI
Posts: 397
Total Cats: 36
Default

Originally Posted by Erat
Props for the post.

It should also be noted that some people were experiencing fitment issues with fuel rails. Someone will post the correct info or correct me, I can't seem to remember off the top of my head. Was it return-less NB guys? There is also a relocation of the TB inlet location, people with rigid charge pipes or reroute could have fitment issues they didn't have before.

Again, just something to keep in mind for a bottom line decision.
Just popping in to say I can confirm the NB1 rail with the 90-93 FPR flipped over fits better than it does on a VCTS, VICS or Square top.
Goingnowherefast is offline  
Old 12-21-2017, 05:07 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
HarryB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 1,014
Total Cats: 140
Default

Peak numbers say only half of the story. Yay for collecting all data points, nay for not adding plots
HarryB is offline  
Old 12-21-2017, 05:14 PM
  #6  
FAB
Former Vendor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
FAB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 971
Total Cats: 417
Default

Originally Posted by HarryB
Peak numbers say only half of the story. Yay for collecting all data points, nay for not adding plots
All of the plots are there, outside of FM and 949's findings. Like I said, I didn't personally operate the dyno and the plot lines are graphed so thick it's difficult to decipher one from the other but they are illustrated. That being said, they are so in line with the square top that you can't see much of a difference.

I'm working with them to get a different line thickness.
FAB is offline  
Old 12-21-2017, 05:47 PM
  #7  
Junior Member
 
phocup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 343
Total Cats: 2
Default

Thanks for doing the test. Subbed for spacer results.
phocup is offline  
Old 12-21-2017, 06:12 PM
  #8  
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
ooja3k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
Posts: 230
Total Cats: 22
Default

By changes in calibration you mean changes to the tune? Fuel and/or timing?
ooja3k is offline  
Old 12-21-2017, 06:48 PM
  #9  
FAB
Former Vendor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
FAB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 971
Total Cats: 417
Default

Originally Posted by ooja3k
By changes in calibration you mean changes to the tune? Fuel and/or timing?
Yes, just swapped it and ran it.
FAB is offline  
Old 12-21-2017, 09:00 PM
  #10  
Elite Member
iTrader: (11)
 
chicksdigmiatas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Texas, 'Murica
Posts: 2,497
Total Cats: 0
Default

Originally Posted by FAB
Yes, just swapped it and ran it.
So what colors were what again? I about had a stroke trying to figure it out. Then there was that huge blob in the middle?
chicksdigmiatas is offline  
Reply
Leave a poscat -1 Leave a negcat
Old 12-21-2017, 10:08 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
Schroedinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 790
Total Cats: 188
Default

Originally Posted by FAB
Yes, just swapped it and ran it.
Kudos for the work, hard data is always appreciated and I know it requires time and expense to get it, so thanks.

I’ve wrestled with this decision when comparing variables. It’s good scientific practice to change only one variable and measure. The issue is that changing the IM surely changes the volumetric efficiency, and the gains that the manifold may provide would be unrealized without a re-tune. “Changing only one variable” could mean running an ideal tune for the VE that each manifold provides. Keeping the tune the same may actually introduce a confounding variable.Just thinking out loud here...
Schroedinger is offline  
Old 12-21-2017, 11:10 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
acedeuce802's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Farmington Hills, MI
Posts: 1,218
Total Cats: 175
Default

I think tuning for intake changes would depend on competency of the tuner. Ideally, the fuel and spark would be updated for the new intake to extract the best power curve for each. If tuning for the new intake manifold is going to produce inconsistent results (due to an inconsistent tuner) then just leave it be.
acedeuce802 is offline  
Old 12-22-2017, 12:38 AM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
AlwaysBroken's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: TAMPA, FL
Posts: 817
Total Cats: 20
Default

So it's basically the same as a squaretop to within a tenth of a horsepower. Amazing.

Still, if you don't already have a squaretop, junk2 is actually not a bad value proposition.
AlwaysBroken is offline  
Old 12-22-2017, 09:41 AM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
Schroedinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 790
Total Cats: 188
Default

Originally Posted by acedeuce802
I think tuning for intake changes would depend on competency of the tuner. Ideally, the fuel and spark would be updated for the new intake to extract the best power curve for each. If tuning for the new intake manifold is going to produce inconsistent results (due to an inconsistent tuner) then just leave it be.
There’s always Autotune. For better or worse, it follows the same algorithm every time.
Schroedinger is offline  
Old 12-22-2017, 09:53 AM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
Mazdaspeeder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 916
Total Cats: 70
Default

I still don't see any reason for existing Squaretop owners to go out and "upgrade" though.
Mazdaspeeder is offline  
Old 12-22-2017, 10:04 AM
  #16  
Moderator
iTrader: (12)
 
sixshooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 20,650
Total Cats: 3,011
Default

Originally Posted by Mazdaspeeder
I still don't see any reason for existing Squaretop owners to go out and "upgrade" though.
There is none.
sixshooter is online now  
Old 12-22-2017, 10:30 AM
  #17  
FAB
Former Vendor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
FAB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 971
Total Cats: 417
Default

Originally Posted by Mazdaspeeder
I still don't see any reason for existing Squaretop owners to go out and "upgrade" though.
I can't say there are pressing needs to upgrade here but I'll cover a couple of the advantages that one might find useful.
1. It's new
2. It can be taken apart for port/polish work to be done easily
3. It looks nicer

Originally Posted by acedeuce802
I think tuning for intake changes would depend on competency of the tuner. Ideally, the fuel and spark would be updated for the new intake to extract the best power curve for each. If tuning for the new intake manifold is going to produce inconsistent results (due to an inconsistent tuner) then just leave it be.
Completely agree. But for the sake of being on the same page with everyone the calibration was untouched. I'm sure there were improvements to be made.

Originally Posted by chicksdigmiatas
So what colors were what again? I about had a stroke trying to figure it out. Then there was that huge blob in the middle?
You're telling me, I'm awaiting cleaner lines - sorry guys. The bottom line is, minimal improvements were achieved with just the swap and then with 3psi she seems to be touching the efficiency pocket of that turbocharger.
FAB is offline  
Old 12-22-2017, 10:38 AM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
Mazdaspeeder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 916
Total Cats: 70
Default

I gotta say I like the look of the manifold on a table but when its installed in the car I think its odd, maybe just because of how far out it pushes out. I'm not sure if that's just my OCD wanting the distance from end of manifold to spark plug holes to be the same on both the intake and exhaust side, or maybe its because I think it looks out of place in a Miata. That might be due to years of seeing non S2 manifolds in them. Nice that it performs well, and will be an alternative to the JDM manifold when they run out or if importing them becomes harder. Any competition in the market is good. But for me, since I already own a Squaretop, I'm going to port that to match my S2 TB and install it. If I didn't already own a square top, I'd probably just get this because i guess I wouldn't even need to match it to the TB
Mazdaspeeder is offline  
Old 12-22-2017, 11:03 AM
  #19  
FAB
Former Vendor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
FAB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 971
Total Cats: 417
Default

Originally Posted by Braineack
is the bright red plot the square or skunk2?
Bright red is S2.
FAB is offline  
Old 12-22-2017, 12:08 PM
  #20  
Elite Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Stealth97's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Canton, Ga
Posts: 2,156
Total Cats: 66
Default

I’m still trying to decide which manifold for myN/a car.. I may go with flat top to keep some midrange since it’s a street car.
Stealth97 is offline  


Quick Reply: Skunk2 vs Square/Flat Top Intake Manifold - Dyno Results



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:55 PM.