Snakey Header dyno - Page 3 - Miata Turbo Forum - Boost cars, acquire cats.

Welcome to   Members

Engine Performance This section is for discussion on all engine building related questions.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-02-2015, 10:31 PM   #41
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,436
Total Cats: 58

Originally Posted by Leafy View Post
And piecuts dont flow as well as mandrel bends, and **** doing that many welds.

Haha I'm sure the ID looks like this:
Attached Thumbnails
Snakey Header dyno-178774613.jpg  
Enginerd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2015, 08:04 PM   #42
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (3)
emilio700's Avatar
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 5,326
Total Cats: 1,348

CX racing joy

Runner #1 is about 26" long
Runner #4 is about 14" long


Every internal junction has these cold welds protruding into the airstream

This is from the head side so exhaust flows against that step. Many of the junctions are mated like this.
emilio700 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2015, 08:51 PM   #43
I take big bites
iTrader: (1)
turbofan's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Hurricane, UT
Posts: 6,930
Total Cats: 526

Attached Thumbnails
Snakey Header dyno-image.png  
turbofan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2015, 09:24 PM   #44
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Posts: 10
Total Cats: -3

tpc0531 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2015, 10:32 PM   #45
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 90
Total Cats: -15

At least they tried to grind down some of the welds
whitrzac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2015, 11:39 AM   #46
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 3
Total Cats: -1

I was looking into the header as a someone posted it on the FB group with a video clip and it sounded great, it sure did sound like a Subaru. After looking at those pictures from Emilio, there is no way I would buy that. The craftsmanship is horrible, especially for the price. I will just wait off another year and put the funds into the turbo build.

Thank you for those pictures Emilio.
KiNg MaRtY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2015, 01:07 PM   #47
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
concealer404's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 8,465
Total Cats: 784

Post video link.
concealer404 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2015, 03:04 PM   #48
Elite Member
iTrader: (9)
TurboTim's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chesterfield, NJ
Posts: 6,485
Total Cats: 248

Originally Posted by Full_Tilt_Boogie View Post
Probably sounds like a subie.

Speaking of which, didnt someone do a turbo manifold with severely un-equal length 1-2 and 2-3, which sounded very subaru-ish?
Originally Posted by 18psi View Post
yes, timmah, and I loved it
Originally Posted by Chooofoojoo View Post
That car makes all the noises I want in my life. Do want.
Buy it! It's wasting away in my attic.

Originally Posted by concealer404 View Post
Post video link.
yeah I want to hear too.
TurboTim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2015, 03:34 PM   #49
SADFab Destructive Testing Engineer
iTrader: (5)
aidandj's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Beaverton, USA
Posts: 17,999
Total Cats: 1,466

<p>Wait, if emilio has one does that mean were actually getting a dyno comparison? </p>
aidandj is offline   Reply With Quote

Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Why dynos should plot Torque divided by MAP JasonC SBB ECUs and Tuning 11 10-27-2015 05:56 PM
Time to start learning and play with tuning The Gleas MEGAsquirt 3 10-01-2015 10:30 AM
3rd Time's a Charm...hopefully. zephyrusaurai Meet and Greet 2 09-28-2015 11:59 PM
1.8, C30-74 Rotrex, 9psi, 235WHP/190WTQ (E85) Lincoln Logs Dynos and timesheets 4 09-23-2015 01:26 PM

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:16 AM.