Notices
Engine Performance This section is for discussion on all engine building related questions.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: KPower

Upgrade camshafts

Old Feb 6, 2014 | 04:50 PM
  #101  
concealer404's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,917
Total Cats: 2,206
Default

Originally Posted by Impuls
I thought they were sold as "Mazdaspeed" not comp.
BUT, to run 272 it's suggested to run shim-under correct? Or we can ask Mazda what they did to build the turbo dragster.
I'd convert to shim-under (Or shimless) anytime you're talking about a reground cam. Increasing lift on a ground cam involves decreasing the base circle.

Taking that up involves thicker shims. Thicker shims on a shim-over setup is ******.
Old Feb 6, 2014 | 04:56 PM
  #102  
Leafy's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 9,491
Total Cats: 105
From: NH
Default

Originally Posted by Impuls
I thought they were sold as "Mazdaspeed" not comp.
BUT, to run 272 it's suggested to run shim-under correct? Or we can ask Mazda what they did to build the turbo dragster.
272 is just the duration. Its meaningless.
Old Feb 6, 2014 | 05:32 PM
  #103  
thenuge26's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,267
Total Cats: 239
From: Indianapolis
Default

Originally Posted by Impuls
Exactly, it's garbage. I git pissed when I took apart my engine. Why wouldn't they do that?!
I assume the MSM was engineered by accountants, not engineers.
Old Feb 6, 2014 | 05:34 PM
  #104  
concealer404's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,917
Total Cats: 2,206
Default

Originally Posted by thenuge26
I assume the MSM was engineered by accountants, not engineers.

Think of it like the RWD Mazdaspeed Protege. Engineered and designed by engineers. Then completely assfucked by accountants.
Old Feb 6, 2014 | 05:36 PM
  #105  
Leafy's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 9,491
Total Cats: 105
From: NH
Default

Originally Posted by concealer404
Think of it like the RWD Mazdaspeed Protege. Engineered and designed by engineers. Then completely assfucked by accountants.
I thought that was every car.
Old Feb 6, 2014 | 05:38 PM
  #106  
concealer404's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,917
Total Cats: 2,206
Default

Originally Posted by Leafy
I thought that was every car.
It is, but it's way worse in the under $30k turbo limited release segment.
Old Feb 6, 2014 | 05:46 PM
  #107  
thenuge26's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,267
Total Cats: 239
From: Indianapolis
Default

There's still some that sneak by. Like the C63 AMG or the Magnum SRT-8. They must have tied up the bean-counters.
Old Feb 6, 2014 | 06:22 PM
  #108  
Impuls's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 754
Total Cats: 19
From: Tampa, FL
Default

Originally Posted by Leafy
272 is just the duration. Its meaningless.
I know this. But I'm not going to type out the entire measurements when I can just say 272 and anyone with common knowledge would know your taking about aggressive cams. Unless your taking v8. Then I should just say aggressive cams. My bad.
Meanless, no though, very important.

Turbo= high duration/short lift
N/A= short duration/high lift
Correct? Simplified
Also I like ******.. but no seriously.
I've looked into cams and have supertek double springs, solid under shim as the setup. Which would be marvelous for 8k red line.
Old Feb 6, 2014 | 06:25 PM
  #109  
ardler_dan's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 56
Total Cats: 9
Default

Originally Posted by Impuls
Turbo= high duration/short lift
N/A= short duration/high lift
I tend to run them the other way around - big duration (with the right headwork) helps NA engines scavenge well and helps create power.

High lift with shorter duration reduces overlap but allows peak flow figures for a long duration than stock. Perfect for a turbo.
Old Feb 6, 2014 | 06:26 PM
  #110  
concealer404's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,917
Total Cats: 2,206
Default

It's really not that simple, anyways.

Next cam for my daily driver will have huge exhaust duration and lift. Short intake duration, big-ish lift.
Old Feb 6, 2014 | 06:34 PM
  #111  
Impuls's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 754
Total Cats: 19
From: Tampa, FL
Default

Indeed, engines are never really simple. Besides No replacement for displacement and Turbo = awesome.

Wait, did I get it backwards?
Is it
Turbo= short duration/high lift
N/A= high duration/short lift
Old Feb 6, 2014 | 06:37 PM
  #112  
concealer404's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,917
Total Cats: 2,206
Default

Really depends on the motor. I don't know that turbo BPs like.

I want both high duration and lift on the exhaust of my motor because my combined exhaust valve area is about the size of a mushroom stamp.
Old Feb 6, 2014 | 07:34 PM
  #113  
Impuls's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 754
Total Cats: 19
From: Tampa, FL
Default

Originally Posted by concealer404
Really depends on the motor. I don't know that turbo BPs like.

I want both high duration and lift on the exhaust of my motor because my combined exhaust valve area is about the size of a mushroom stamp.
I was told
Turbo= high duration/short lift
N/A= short duration/high lift
Talking intake, by a reputable Honda engine builder.

I wonder what it's like for Turbo BP. Anyone have inside on this?

Also, what kind if mushroom stamp? Black? Yellow?
Old Feb 6, 2014 | 08:38 PM
  #114  
Full_Tilt_Boogie's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 5,155
Total Cats: 409
From: Jacksonville, FL
Default

Originally Posted by Impuls
I was told
Turbo= high duration/short lift
N/A= short duration/high lift
Talking intake, by a reputable Honda engine builder.
This sounds very wrong. Not to mention oversimplified.

Longer duration is a necessity when an engine is operating at high rpm, regardless of it being naturally or force aspirated. In the case of being supercharged or turbocharged you typically would need less duration to get the same affect because of the positive pressure, but it has a lot more to do with the engines speed than anything. More revs means less time for cylinder filling and evacuation to happen, which means you need more duration.

Lots of duration comes with added effects on valve timing (late intake valve closing in particular) which are often really bad for turbo engines. So if anything I would say that its the exact opposite of what this builder told you.

Turbo cams usually use high lift to get the flow that they cant get from long duration. Ive even heard of people buying turbo specific cam grinds and actually losing peak power because the grind has less duration than stock (with more lift and an advanced intake profile). They gain spool and a lot of mid range, but up at high rpm the cams lowered duration makes the engine run out of breath.
Old Feb 6, 2014 | 09:05 PM
  #115  
ctdrftna's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,146
Total Cats: 56
From: Cromwell CT
Default

What full tilt said !!!! And let's speak of duration @.05 or 1mm , advertised duration is useless
Old Feb 7, 2014 | 12:15 AM
  #116  
Impuls's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 754
Total Cats: 19
From: Tampa, FL
Default

Maybe it's a Honda thing. Or he was just talking out his ***. He also sarcastically said gridlock with my Wiseco pistons.

Short duration seems more oriented to boosted cars, like you said, since the air is being forced in it should need a long.

So, just run massive duration/lift for ALLOFIT


Ctdrftna, your cans were custom weren't they? Remember the specs?
Old Feb 7, 2014 | 05:46 AM
  #117  
ctdrftna's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,146
Total Cats: 56
From: Cromwell CT
Default

Mine are the massive/ALLOFIT cams you speak of. The specs are

296(260 something at .05) .495 lift intake
282(250 something at .05) .455 lift exhaust

I will be running different cams when this motor goes into my new car
Old Feb 7, 2014 | 08:31 AM
  #118  
shlammed's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,910
Total Cats: 51
From: Kingston, Ontario
Default

CT, your cams seem like a good match for my all motor build. we should chat.

you would have had to clearance the head, but did you have any problems with standard valve guides being too long with that much intake lift?
Old Feb 7, 2014 | 08:47 AM
  #119  
ctdrftna's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,146
Total Cats: 56
From: Cromwell CT
Default

The head is clearanced, I'm running the supertech dual springs without the inner spring, and a .015 shim to get my spring pressure right. I have bronze guides , but I don't think they are any different dimensionally from stock. I know I'm close on retainer to seal clearance. But iv had no problems with these cams.

I did replace a few mazda comp lifters over the winter because they had some funny marks on the top . Looked like the chrome playing came off or something.
Old Feb 7, 2014 | 10:41 AM
  #120  
Impuls's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 754
Total Cats: 19
From: Tampa, FL
Default

Originally Posted by ctdrftna
Mine are the massive/ALLOFIT cams you speak of. The specs are

296(260 something at .05) .495 lift intake
282(250 something at .05) .455 lift exhaust

I will be running different cams when this motor goes into my new car
The RPM range of those were like 5000-10000 rpm right? It's been awhile since I read the build thread.
I wouldn't mind a max 7200 or 7500 rpm cam.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:37 PM.