Engine Performance This section is for discussion on all engine building related questions.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: KPower

VVT engine swap plan opinions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-06-2016, 09:38 AM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
blackandtan22's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 64
Total Cats: 3
Default VVT engine swap plan opinions

I bought a used VVT engine to swap into my NA perhaps next fall. My plan is RB header, RS3 exhaust, Skunk2 port matched to VICS intake, and 3d printed intake (carbon fiber version). The car is strictly for the track. I wanted opinions for the actual engine. Here are my the options I'm considering:

1. Don't touch engine except TB, water pump, etc. Engine has about 140k on it and has been tested to have good compression.

2. General maintenance + pull head to change head gasket to NA style and install coolant reroute.

3. Number 2 + mild head work, supertech springs and SS valves (not oversized though)

4. Number 3 + billet oil pump, 10.5 OEM pistons w/ coating.

Few more pieces of info. I already bought valve springs, valves, and pistons, coolant reroute (on my current engine) . So at some point I'll get to number 4.

Really trying to gauge should I pull head to just change gasket or at that point go further. Just wanted to get opinions. Currently was leaning towards 3.
blackandtan22 is offline  
Old 03-06-2016, 10:21 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Roda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Sierra Vista, AZ
Posts: 1,193
Total Cats: 294
Default

I'm in the middle of putting a VVT engine into my '92, and I did #2... TB/WP, head gasket, coolant re-route, new seals and gaskets. I also did a valve adjustment because a few of them were out of spec.

If you already have valve springs and valves, I'd seriously consider going through the head while it's off.
Roda is offline  
Old 03-06-2016, 10:37 AM
  #3  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
blackandtan22's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 64
Total Cats: 3
Default

Originally Posted by Roda

If you already have valve springs and valves, I'd seriously consider going through the head while it's off.
That was my exact thought, and just leave bottom alone until engine warrants it.
blackandtan22 is offline  
Old 03-06-2016, 11:31 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
btabor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 610
Total Cats: 12
Default

I did "option 2" plus a standard valve job, seals and a 99 head gasket with a coolant reroute. Leave the bottom end alone, add a washer to the oil pump spring.

I got a rs3 exhaust and returned it for an enthuza 2.25". The enthuza looks much better in my opinion and it fitted perfectly. Got it with the test pipe for $475 shipped. Sounds amazing. I did basically the same swap you are doing. Will dyno tune in a week. Milled the head .030" stock bottom end. I added a .060" to the stock oil pump relief spring and it runs with pretty high oil pressure. It was a tip from a miata engine builder in town
btabor is offline  
Old 03-06-2016, 04:46 PM
  #5  
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Savington's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,099
Default

I would do #2, or maybe #3 without the valvetrain upgrades. Stock valves are fine, and your money is better spent on a good P&P than stock-sized undercut valves IMO. Valve springs and billet OPGs are a waste unless you're planning to open the motor and add rods too.

#2 is easy, no machine work needed, can be done in an afternoon for the cost of the head gasket. #3 will cost you a few hundred dollars and add maybe 8-10whp to the car at most.

This all assumes you have an ECU already.
Savington is offline  
Old 03-06-2016, 04:56 PM
  #6  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
blackandtan22's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 64
Total Cats: 3
Default

Originally Posted by Savington
I would do #2, or maybe #3 without the valvetrain upgrades. Stock valves are fine, and your money is better spent on a good P&P than stock-sized undercut valves IMO. Valve springs and billet OPGs are a waste unless you're planning to open the motor and add rods too.

#2 is easy, no machine work needed, can be done in an afternoon for the cost of the head gasket. #3 will cost you a few hundred dollars and add maybe 8-10whp to the car at most.

This all assumes you have an ECU already.
So I already bought SS Supertech Valves (the intake are the high flow undercut ones) and Supertech dual springs. Couldn't resist during black friday. I also already have the ECU.

I'd be doing a P&P for sure if I did #3. Would you recommend a mild head shave as well say .020'' range? I just don't want to be interference.

I won't touch the bottom after reading folks opinions except for maintenance stuff and maybe the shim in the oil pump.
blackandtan22 is offline  
Old 04-25-2016, 07:21 PM
  #7  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
blackandtan22's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 64
Total Cats: 3
Default

I am going with option 3. I pulled the head this weekend and wanted to get people's opinion on the condition of one of the cylinders (all seem about the same). All seems smooth, but wanted to see if color of walls or anything else is a concern.
Attached Thumbnails VVT engine swap plan opinions-20160423_150914.jpg   VVT engine swap plan opinions-20160423_150906.jpg   VVT engine swap plan opinions-20160423_150900.jpg  
blackandtan22 is offline  
Old 04-26-2016, 10:39 AM
  #8  
Junior Member
 
my97miata's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 135
Total Cats: -52
Default

Why not add +1 mm valves while you're at it?
my97miata is offline  
Old 04-26-2016, 11:18 AM
  #9  
SADFab Destructive Testing Engineer
iTrader: (5)
 
aidandj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Beaverton, USA
Posts: 18,642
Total Cats: 1,866
Default

Originally Posted by blackandtan22
So I already bought SS Supertech Valves (the intake are the high flow undercut ones) and Supertech dual springs. Couldn't resist during black friday. I also already have the ECU.

I'd be doing a P&P for sure if I did #3. Would you recommend a mild head shave as well say .020'' range? I just don't want to be interference.

I won't touch the bottom after reading folks opinions except for maintenance stuff and maybe the shim in the oil pump.
Pretty sure it it's interference stock. I think we determined this in another thread recently.
aidandj is offline  
Old 07-03-2017, 10:08 AM
  #10  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
blackandtan22's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 64
Total Cats: 3
Default Take 2

So some time has passed and my plans have changed. I've decided to go all out. Let me know if I am missing anything big for a N/A build.

- VVT CNC head
- +1 valves
- light double valve springs
- Shim under bucket
- 85mm 11:1 pistons
- Manley forged rods
- Custom cams
- VICs intake port matched to skunk tb
- 3d printed intake
- MSLabs MS3
- Racing beat header
- 949 harmonic damper
- Billet oil pump
- Oil pan baffle
- coolant reroute
- arp bolts
- race bearings where possible
- Thermal coating: pistons, combustion chamber, exhaust ports, valves
- flow force injectors
- 8k redline
blackandtan22 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
guttedmiata
Miata parts for sale/trade
6
03-30-2016 04:09 PM
beatle
Engine Performance
13
03-06-2016 02:07 PM
nismo502
Engine Performance
3
02-23-2016 10:52 AM



Quick Reply: VVT engine swap plan opinions



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:55 PM.