Notices
Front Desk Questions, suggestions, site problems? Put all your site related threads in here.

can we dump the image applet?

Old Jul 14, 2015 | 03:09 PM
  #21  
Joe Perez's Avatar
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 34,402
Total Cats: 7,523
From: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Default

Originally Posted by Braineack
(a bunch of hating)
To quote myself from the exact same post in which you selectively quoted me saying that the "manage attachment" button wasn't significantly better than the new applet:

Originally Posted by Joe Perez
In a perfect universe, the button would go back to the old popup into which you can quickly paste a link and be done with it. And a new system would be devised which merges the functionality of the existing button with that of the new applet, giving users a quick and easy way to upload a file directly from their PC and insert it into the message, while also permitting attachments which have already been uploaded to be deleted.

I realize that's asking for a lot, and I'd be perfectly happy if the remained completely unchanged and the new applet simply died in a fire. I'm just allowing for the fact that some people might find the "upload from local" functionality of the new applet to be marginally more user-friendly than the way the existing screen works (even though it provides the same level of functionality.)

You know what's coming next:

Attached Thumbnails can we dump the image applet?-11223549_10152810784366504_156081155140630265_n.jpg  
Old Jul 14, 2015 | 03:10 PM
  #22  
DNMakinson's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,030
Total Cats: 861
From: Seneca, SC
Default

<p>I'm a good tester. Tend to break things by doing stuff that those skilled in the art might not attempt.</p>
Old Jul 14, 2015 | 03:12 PM
  #23  
hornetball's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 6,301
Total Cats: 697
From: Granbury, TX
Default

Well, we could optimize this for , or we could exercise KISS and serve the vast majority of users better. Just sayin'.
Old Jul 14, 2015 | 03:25 PM
  #24  
y8s's Avatar
y8s
Thread Starter
DEI liberal femininity
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 19,338
Total Cats: 574
From: Fake Virginia
Default

I got news for you: Brain DGAF.
Old Jul 14, 2015 | 03:34 PM
  #25  
mgeoffriau's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 7,388
Total Cats: 474
From: Jackson, MS
Default

Thread, co-signed.
Old Jul 14, 2015 | 03:47 PM
  #26  
hornetball's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 6,301
Total Cats: 697
From: Granbury, TX
Default

Originally Posted by y8s
I got news for you: Brain DGAF.
That's news?
Old Jul 14, 2015 | 05:06 PM
  #27  
sixshooter's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 22,204
Total Cats: 3,560
From: Tampa, Florida
Default

I hate you guys for making me scroll left to right to read.
Old Jul 14, 2015 | 05:38 PM
  #28  
aidandj's Avatar
SADFab Destructive Testing Engineer
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 18,643
Total Cats: 1,870
From: Beaverton, USA
Default

<p>On my portrait monitor this thread is hell. </p><p><span>@DNMakinson I use imgur. Sign up, upload pictures. My favorite bit is that when you go view all your pictures you can click on the &quot;view image info&quot; drop-down and change to Generate image links. Then you select everything you want. Pick your format (I use Linked BBCode, so it auto-generates the [IMG] tags for me. Then choose your size (so I don't have huge pictures) and then copy what is generated.</span></p><p><span>Works great for my build thread. For posting random pictures from online the applet sucks. But I barely use it because of how Imgur does stuff.</span></p>
Old Jul 14, 2015 | 08:39 PM
  #29  
DNMakinson's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,030
Total Cats: 861
From: Seneca, SC
Default

<p>But I understand that imgur drops pics after a time. I don't want my build thread to end up with broken links after a while. Now if the forum pics them up and re-hosts them, then I wouldn't mind going that route.</p>
Old Jul 14, 2015 | 08:40 PM
  #30  
aidandj's Avatar
SADFab Destructive Testing Engineer
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 18,643
Total Cats: 1,870
From: Beaverton, USA
Default

Originally Posted by DNMakinson
<p>But I understand that imgur drops pics after a time. I don't want my build thread to end up with broken links after a while. Now if the forum pics them up and re-hosts them, then I wouldn't mind going that route.</p>
<br />
<br /><br />
<br />That's news to me I have 1200 imgur photos.
Old Jul 14, 2015 | 08:43 PM
  #31  
Joe Perez's Avatar
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 34,402
Total Cats: 7,523
From: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Default

Originally Posted by DNMakinson
<p>But I understand that imgur drops pics after a time. I don't want my build thread to end up with broken links after a while.
I've used a number of free image hosts over the years. Imageshack, Picoodle, Geocities, Imgur, Kodak...

Thus far, Imgur is the only one that hasn't completely fucked me over by deleting my old pictures, closing abruptly, disallowing hotlinks, or suddenly throttling my bandwidth quota to nothing and not even allowing me to download my old images unless I pay them.

I fully expect that to change, however. Free third-party image hosts simply cannot be trusted. I've lost way too much work and too many "howto" drawings...


Originally Posted by DNMakinson
Now if the forum pics them up and re-hosts them, then I wouldn't mind going that route.</p>
It does. It has for quite a while. It's free, it's automatic, and we won't delete your ****.
Old Jul 14, 2015 | 10:05 PM
  #32  
sixshooter's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 22,204
Total Cats: 3,560
From: Tampa, Florida
Default

Originally Posted by Joe Perez
...and we won't delete your ****.
...yet.

...unless you are saving props. Or anything else that may be arbitrarily removed by the ownership. This ain't yer stuff here.
Old Jul 15, 2015 | 10:07 AM
  #33  
y8s's Avatar
y8s
Thread Starter
DEI liberal femininity
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 19,338
Total Cats: 574
From: Fake Virginia
Default

back on topic please. can someone using the new interface tag the IB staff?
Old Jul 15, 2015 | 10:29 AM
  #34  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

Originally Posted by Joe Perez
To quote myself from the exact same post in which you selectively quoted me saying that the "manage attachment" button wasn't significantly better than the new applet:

[posts a bunch of drivel that has nothing to do with that statement and leaves out the revelant statement]
my post was relevant to this:

Originally Posted by Joe Perez
The new applet is not significantly better for multiple files than the [MA] button.
I'd rather you be able to drag and drop images directly into this window but you cant. I'd also like to be able to poo from my chair right now without getting up. But none of that matters.

You said CURRENTLY the [MA] button is better than the applet. I disagree:

you have to first click "go advanced", then "manage attachments", then click upload for each individual file. You can only upload 5. Then you have to click "upload".

If you want to then display the images inline to your post, you need to then right click on each image get the new image url, and paste each link in the text area and surround them with [img] tags.

with the applet, you can click the image icon from the quick reply box. Click "browse my device" and select all the images you want to attach at once. It displays the images youve attached, gives you an area to attach text to each one and adjust the display order. Then when you click "insert" it inserts the images into the text formatted corrected for display.

That's MUCH better. sorry, but it is.


Oh wait, I'm sorry, I actually argued your point, sorry.

In a perfect world I'd like to ride an attack turtle down the streets of Arlington. Therefore you on wrong to suggest thehe new applet is not significantly better for multiple files than the [MA] button.

So you know what's coming next:

Name:  IknVO3Tl.jpg
Views: 59
Size:  59.5 KB
Old Jul 15, 2015 | 10:35 AM
  #35  
aidandj's Avatar
SADFab Destructive Testing Engineer
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 18,643
Total Cats: 1,870
From: Beaverton, USA
Default

<p>
Originally Posted by y8s
on topic
</p><p>Whats that...</p><p><span>@IB Nolan</span></p>
Old Jul 16, 2015 | 12:03 AM
  #36  
Jeffbucc's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 2,764
Total Cats: 951
From: Cedar City, UT
Default

My question is why are we trying to make old VB bulletin software work with new ****? Why not upgrade to the newest version like any other forum does? Legacy software adapted to new software is ******* infuriating a la my label printer that has drivers and software that barely work in windows 7 unless you offer a goat sacrifice to the printer gods.
Old Jul 16, 2015 | 07:39 AM
  #37  
shuiend's Avatar
mkturbo.com
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 15,235
Total Cats: 1,700
From: Charleston SC
Default

Originally Posted by Jeffbucc
My question is why are we trying to make old VB bulletin software work with new ****? Why not upgrade to the newest version like any other forum does? Legacy software adapted to new software is ******* infuriating a la my label printer that has drivers and software that barely work in windows 7 unless you offer a goat sacrifice to the printer gods.
Because IB hosts thousands of forums and doing a mass upgrade is an easy way to break them all.
Old Jul 16, 2015 | 08:23 AM
  #38  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

**** all other forums.
Old Jul 16, 2015 | 08:28 AM
  #39  
sixshooter's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 22,204
Total Cats: 3,560
From: Tampa, Florida
Default

Originally Posted by Jeffbucc
My question is why are we trying to make old VB bulletin software work with new ****? Why not upgrade to the newest version like any other forum does? Legacy software adapted to new software is ******* infuriating a la my label printer that has drivers and software that barely work in windows 7 unless you offer a goat sacrifice to the printer gods.




Old Jul 16, 2015 | 08:47 AM
  #40  
Joe Perez's Avatar
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 34,402
Total Cats: 7,523
From: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Default

Guinea pigs, while moronic, are undeniably cute.

That said, I don't think there's any need to pop a gasket about the forum software in general. Frankly I'm glad that we're not having to be a beta tester VB5. We're on release 3.8.7, and it works pretty damned well. I can absolutely guarantee that if we were to upgrade to 5.0, you guys would be bitching and screaming worse than if the ownership of cats as pets in the US were outlawed.

90% of the changes which have been made to this forums config over the past few years have been huge positives. Occasionally, something retarded gets implemented, and the new image uploader app is an example of that. But comparing that to a legacy printer driver is just retarded.

For the record, I have a 10 year old Panduit label printer with a parallel port on it, and not only does it work just fine under Win7, I have it shared across the domain here at work so that everyone can print to it directly out of WireCAD.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:34 PM.