Notices
General Miata Chat A place to talk about anything Miata

100 octane: is it good for miata?

Old Dec 10, 2010 | 02:26 PM
  #21  
Miataman28's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 58
Total Cats: -1
From: Oakland ca
Default

Originally Posted by 90R
this is something we found in the early days of SSC. Lower octane made more power on a stock engine. The higher octane we were guessing took too long to burn. Leaving unused BTU's out the tail pipe.
This!
Old Dec 10, 2010 | 02:34 PM
  #22  
DammitBeavis's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 281
Total Cats: 0
From: EXTREME Southern Illinois
Default

I can believe the 'long burn', but if that were the case, couldn't you counter that by advancing the timing to put the cylinder pressure curve back where it belongs (peak pressure at 14deg ATDC IIRC)?
Old Dec 10, 2010 | 02:38 PM
  #23  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

Originally Posted by DammitBeavis
I can believe the 'long burn', but if that were the case, couldn't you counter that by advancing the timing to put the cylinder pressure curve back where it belongs (peak pressure at 14deg ATDC IIRC)?
Yes you could. but then we're not talking about a STOCK running motor, which is what this thread is about.
Old Dec 10, 2010 | 02:59 PM
  #24  
Miataman28's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 58
Total Cats: -1
From: Oakland ca
Default

Originally Posted by DammitBeavis
I can believe the 'long burn', but if that were the case, couldn't you counter that by advancing the timing to put the cylinder pressure curve back where it belongs (peak pressure at 14deg ATDC IIRC)?
Yes! This is pretty common for n/a guys, but for boosted guys this mean potentially more boost. The higher the octane the slower the fuel burns which give you more oportunity for HP, on the reverse side for a stock engine with you theoretically lose power as you are not releasing the same amount of energy from your combustion cycle.
Old Dec 10, 2010 | 03:40 PM
  #25  
y8s's Avatar
y8s
DEI liberal femininity
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 19,338
Total Cats: 574
From: Fake Virginia
Default

20 years ago, advancing the timing was possible on a stock engine.
Old Dec 10, 2010 | 03:40 PM
  #26  
90R's Avatar
90R
Junior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 278
Total Cats: 0
Default

Originally Posted by DammitBeavis
I can believe the 'long burn', but if that were the case, couldn't you counter that by advancing the timing to put the cylinder pressure curve back where it belongs (peak pressure at 14deg ATDC IIRC)?
you can, but why stop at just one gain?
Old Dec 10, 2010 | 03:57 PM
  #27  
DammitBeavis's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 281
Total Cats: 0
From: EXTREME Southern Illinois
Default

Originally Posted by 90R
you can, but why stop at just one gain?
Huh?
Old Dec 10, 2010 | 04:01 PM
  #28  
90R's Avatar
90R
Junior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 278
Total Cats: 0
Default

advance the timing and run 87
Old Dec 10, 2010 | 04:05 PM
  #29  
DammitBeavis's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 281
Total Cats: 0
From: EXTREME Southern Illinois
Default

I was assuming that it was already optimized for 87 and was simply pointing out how power loss could be minimized if the lower output from a higher octane fuel was related only to the burn speed and not the energy per unit volume of the fuel.

Edit: In addition it wouldn't matter on a stock engine anyway since you would need to massage the entire curve considering piston speed, and not just an overall change from moving triggers.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Tony the Tiger
Miata parts for sale/trade
63
Dec 29, 2016 02:23 AM
Tekel
Cars for sale/trade
29
Feb 5, 2016 04:16 PM
PaperMate
Insert BS here
32
Sep 25, 2015 08:22 AM
ProjectDDoS
Build Threads
1
Sep 9, 2015 01:52 PM
SuperSneakySecretSquirrel
Meet and Greet
5
Sep 6, 2015 08:30 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:55 AM.