Notices
General Miata Chat A place to talk about anything Miata

Current accepted drivetrane loss data

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 26, 2010 | 05:55 PM
  #1  
miatauser884's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,959
Total Cats: 11
Default Current accepted drivetrane loss data

After quite a bit of reading here, m.net, and various other sites. My knowledge points me in the direction of (static loss + smaller non-linear friction dependence on power output.) So static loss + % total power loss. However, the % total power loss is small. The later is small enough that the larger the power output, the % total parasitic loss actually decreases.

Emelio suggested 35HP in a recent rotrex thread. He specified that this is widely accepted, but the criteria of its acceptance was not specified. i.e. 35 HP at stock, 211HP as tested, or up to 500HP.

My point is that on a 200 hp motor there would be a 17.5% drivetrain loss, and on a 350 HP motor it would be 10%.

Why is this important to me. When selecting a clutch for a dual duty car, there sometimes comes a point when you are approching the organic disk/ 6 puck threshold.

I am at this junction.
Old Dec 26, 2010 | 06:00 PM
  #2  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

I think the 35hp loss refers to stock or near stock cars. Not much more than 200hp or so.
Old Dec 26, 2010 | 06:20 PM
  #3  
miatamike203's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,102
Total Cats: 3
From: MONROE CT
Default

Just do the 6 puck unsprung hub clutch, i did it and loved it. You just need to rev it up higher then a normal clutch but other then that i don't think they are as bad as people say.
Old Dec 26, 2010 | 06:26 PM
  #4  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

"not as bad as people say" really doesn't sound encouraging to me, I dunno about you.
I have a sprung 6-puck and it sucks in traffic/city driving when it warms up.
Are you suggesting a non sprung would be MORE pleasant in said conditions?
Old Dec 26, 2010 | 06:57 PM
  #5  
Savington's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,106
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Default

It depends on the flywheel and the pressure plate - I DDed a stock flywheel, 1.8 ACT HD, sprung 6-puck for ~30k in my black car and it wasn't all that bad. Everyone would stall it once but once you got the "blip-slip-go" routine down it was fine. Stop-go traffic sucked a little but just driving it around town wasn't hard at all. The only annoying part was that it would shudder in reverse if you didn't blip the throttle like a ricer.

The rental car's original clutch was a 10lb Fidanza, 1.8 ACT XT with a 6-puck (forget whether it was sprung/unsprung) and it was the worst clutch/fly I've ever driven - nearly undriveable on the street, way worse than my 949 cerametallic twindisc. I'm sure you could get used to it, but you wouldn't want to.
Old Dec 26, 2010 | 07:03 PM
  #6  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

I have the XT with a 6 puck. Stock FW.
The only annoying part was that it would shudder in reverse if you didn't blip the throttle like a ricer
this is spot on.

Overall its not completely horrible, but definitely takes effort to live with.
When cold (or about 20 minutes or less driving) its fine. When it heats up it just gets more and more grabby.

I'd suggest either a combination of hd + extreme pressure plate or 6puck + ss pressure plate. Not both.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
emilio700
Wheels and Tires
151
Jun 2, 2017 02:36 PM
Quinn
Cars for sale/trade
6
Oct 23, 2016 07:58 AM
90 Turbo
MEGAsquirt
19
Oct 19, 2015 03:23 PM
interestedofold
Suspension, Brakes, Drivetrain
5
Sep 29, 2015 01:42 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:50 PM.