Notices
General Miata Chat A place to talk about anything Miata

Flyin Miatas new coilovers...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 22, 2008 | 05:35 PM
  #1  
teknikscian's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 399
Total Cats: 0
From: San Diego CA
Default Flyin Miatas new coilovers...

http://flyinmiata.com/index.php?dept...umber=13-16200

Looks promising, and good competition for 949's Monoflex and the new Ohlins suspension.

offered with a standard 450/300 spring rate but it sounds like these shocks can handle a lot more!

may have to start saving
Old Feb 22, 2008 | 05:36 PM
  #2  
Ben's Avatar
Ben
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,659
Total Cats: 134
From: atlanta-ish
Default

$2k = **** that
Why pay Keith's development costs so he can go play?
__________________
Chief of Floor Sweeping, DIYAutoTune.com & AMP EFI
Crew Chief, Car Owner & Least Valuable Driver, HongNorrthRacing

91 Turbo | 10AE Turbo | 01 Track Rat | #323 Mazda Champcar

Originally Posted by concealer404
Buy an MSPNP Pro, you'll feel better.
Old Feb 22, 2008 | 05:47 PM
  #3  
teknikscian's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 399
Total Cats: 0
From: San Diego CA
Default

monoflex are 1700, ohlins are pretty much 2k as well.

i dont see the problem, aside from not liking FM so much...

unless of course, when the full details are released, they dont offer up the same features and advantages as the other setups...
Old Feb 22, 2008 | 05:48 PM
  #4  
Marc D's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,047
Total Cats: 1
From: Milpitas, CA
Default

interesting design, but i would prefer the 949 coilovers. those dont look too beefy to me, maybe good for lightweight savings?
Old Feb 22, 2008 | 05:49 PM
  #5  
teknikscian's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 399
Total Cats: 0
From: San Diego CA
Default

i believe thats just a stock photo, if you read the description it says they wont have real photos until may when the production units are finished
Old Feb 22, 2008 | 05:55 PM
  #6  
Zabac's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (39)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 4,850
Total Cats: 8
From: High Point NC
Default

very interesting indeed, arm/leg price tag, but look very promising
Old Feb 22, 2008 | 06:03 PM
  #7  
cjernigan's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 8,091
Total Cats: 7
From: Atlanta, GA
Default

I think the major benefit of these shocks compared to the ohlins/jics/flex is the amount of droop and bump travel they have. Atleast that's what i assume from looking at the targamiata.com photos showing the amount of travel it had at full compression and droop.
Old Feb 22, 2008 | 06:22 PM
  #8  
ApexOnYou's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,274
Total Cats: 0
From: South Eastern Wisconsin
Default

Originally Posted by cjernigan
I think the major benefit of these shocks compared to the ohlins/jics/flex is the amount of droop and bump travel they have. Atleast that's what i assume from looking at the targamiata.com photos showing the amount of travel it had at full compression and droop.
That sounds like it. My JICs have only a few inches of droop. My full droop wheel gap with JICs in the air is smaller than my stock ride height wheel gap on the ground. I'll have to keep this in mind when the time comes to replace mine.
Old Feb 22, 2008 | 06:31 PM
  #9  
BenR's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,862
Total Cats: 1
From: ABQ, NM
Default

Interesting, if they are anywhere near as good as promised that's a fair price, and I'd strongly concider picking up a set. Especially with the high banking and, sharp rough transitions my local track has in 4 spots, I've lifted inside tires on stock suspension and old compound azenis before.
Old Feb 22, 2008 | 09:31 PM
  #10  
y8s's Avatar
y8s
DEI liberal femininity
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 19,338
Total Cats: 574
From: Fake Virginia
Default

I'd bet the AFCOs are an honest 2k without too ridiculous of a markup. They're custom valved racing shocks. For a full miata compatible solution, that's pretty good.

Especially when you consider they were probably designed with lengths that are ideal for a miata. Not like the TEIN which are too short and not optimal in my opinion. I read his blog on how the lengths were tuned. It's interesting.

Honestly, if they are what they claim to be, I might consider trading in my FLEX / EFDC on these. I love the idea of using the full amount of travel. And aluminum shock bodies. Reminiscent of my previous Advance Designs but with a real company behind them. The A-Ds also had length issues. at 12.5" you were virtually on the bumps.

Anyway, shock sex.
Old Feb 22, 2008 | 09:44 PM
  #11  
soflarick's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 884
Total Cats: 0
From: Floriduh
Default

I read through the shock development on targamiata.com a couple months ago. It looked quite interesting. Were there updates since a couple months ago?
Old Feb 22, 2008 | 11:10 PM
  #12  
teknikscian's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 399
Total Cats: 0
From: San Diego CA
Default

Originally Posted by y8s
I'd bet the AFCOs are an honest 2k without too ridiculous of a markup. They're custom valved racing shocks. For a full miata compatible solution, that's pretty good.

Especially when you consider they were probably designed with lengths that are ideal for a miata. Not like the TEIN which are too short and not optimal in my opinion. I read his blog on how the lengths were tuned. It's interesting.

Honestly, if they are what they claim to be, I might consider trading in my FLEX / EFDC on these. I love the idea of using the full amount of travel. And aluminum shock bodies. Reminiscent of my previous Advance Designs but with a real company behind them. The A-Ds also had length issues. at 12.5" you were virtually on the bumps.

Anyway, shock sex.

exactly. being able to utilize all of the available shock travel is something im definitely interested in. im looking to change out my setup pretty soon so this looks like a great option...
Old Feb 23, 2008 | 12:44 PM
  #13  
Pitlab77's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,914
Total Cats: 5
From: Houston
Default

rather get FatCat to custom build me something
Old Feb 23, 2008 | 01:09 PM
  #14  
cjernigan's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 8,091
Total Cats: 7
From: Atlanta, GA
Default

The shocks he actually used on the car:

Full droop:

Full compression:

Can you say holy travel batman?
Old Feb 23, 2008 | 01:44 PM
  #15  
y8s's Avatar
y8s
DEI liberal femininity
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 19,338
Total Cats: 574
From: Fake Virginia
Default

the secret is the raised bump stop thingy. It's the only real way to get more stroke out of the long shock suspension.
Old Feb 23, 2008 | 04:46 PM
  #16  
j_man's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 741
Total Cats: 20
Default

Originally Posted by y8s
The A-Ds also had length issues. at 12.5" you were virtually on the bumps.
AD don't have length issues if you were using them with what they were designed for - the FM top hats. They were designed for max droop, and at full compression the tires would hit the wheel wells sooner than these go out of travel ...
Old Feb 23, 2008 | 04:48 PM
  #17  
j_man's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 741
Total Cats: 20
Default

Originally Posted by cjernigan
The shocks he actually used on the car:




Blah. Another ones which don't have floating perches but have the springs resting vs the chassis instead ...








Last edited by j_man; Feb 23, 2008 at 04:59 PM.
Old Feb 23, 2008 | 04:57 PM
  #18  
j_man's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 741
Total Cats: 20
Default

Here is Miata suspension done right ...

Front lower:




Front upper:







Rear lower:




Rear upper:

Old Feb 23, 2008 | 05:24 PM
  #19  
ApexOnYou's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,274
Total Cats: 0
From: South Eastern Wisconsin
Default

Nice to see they have rear uppers that are raised
Old Feb 23, 2008 | 07:37 PM
  #20  
y8s's Avatar
y8s
DEI liberal femininity
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 19,338
Total Cats: 574
From: Fake Virginia
Default

Originally Posted by j_man
AD don't have length issues if you were using them with what they were designed for - the FM top hats. They were designed for max droop, and at full compression the tires would hit the wheel wells sooner than these go out of travel ...
I'm pretty sure the AD shocks had nothing to do with the FM top hats--or if it did, it was a secret nobody told me. And I doubt FM would have sold them incomplete. And if they did, they suck.

Anyway, I used them with the NB top mounts which was almost a huge failure. Ground Control/FM sent me the shocks with 6" front springs. I guess as a joke. Because with the perch at the top and the NB mounts, the car was tucking about an inch and a half of tire up front. ******* awesome.

Anyway the shocks behaved well but I decided to try the flex. I think I prefer the ride of the AD monotubes in general though. Hate the company behind them though (GC).



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:43 PM.