Notices
General Miata Chat A place to talk about anything Miata

My car ran without CAS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 4, 2008 | 08:40 AM
  #1  
Big Boy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 110
Total Cats: 0
From: St. Paul MN
Default My car ran without CAS

I was working on my car this weekend. There was a cable that had rubbed against the accessory belt and had split. I decided to go in and solder what I thought was a connection to my air conditioning. Once I got the under cover off I quickly realized that it wasn't connected to my AC at all but was my crank angle sensor. How is this possible that my car could start up and run decent (probably not the best but seemed fine)? It had been running like this for quite a while.

I soldered up the destroyed wires, plugged in the sensor, reset the computer and it ran without the Check Engine light which was there before.

Last edited by Big Boy; Aug 4, 2008 at 08:51 AM.
Old Aug 4, 2008 | 09:19 AM
  #2  
paul's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,957
Total Cats: 2
From: Point Pleasant, NJ
Default

Year?
96-97(which has a CAS on the exhaust cam also)?
99+(which has a sensor on the intake cam gear too)?
Old Aug 4, 2008 | 09:25 AM
  #3  
Big Boy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 110
Total Cats: 0
From: St. Paul MN
Default

Yes it is a 1997. That is interesting. What is the benefit of having 2 CASs besides the car still being able to run?
Old Aug 4, 2008 | 09:34 AM
  #4  
paul's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,957
Total Cats: 2
From: Point Pleasant, NJ
Default

On a 97 the engine probably runs off the CAS at the exhaust cam still and the crank pulley trigger is probably used for OBDII diagnostics. Aids in determining what cylinder has a misfire etc.
Old Aug 4, 2008 | 09:36 AM
  #5  
Big Boy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 110
Total Cats: 0
From: St. Paul MN
Default

Thanks for that bit of information. I don't know how applicable it will be after this week though. I should be getting Megasquirt installed in the next couple of nights.
Old Aug 4, 2008 | 09:38 AM
  #6  
paul's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,957
Total Cats: 2
From: Point Pleasant, NJ
Default

Are you gonna be running an MS using the cam sensor setup or the newer crank trigger?
Old Aug 4, 2008 | 09:47 AM
  #7  
Big Boy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 110
Total Cats: 0
From: St. Paul MN
Default

I haven't thought it through fully yet. By crank trigger you are referring to the sensor I had to fix, correct? Is this simply setup in megatune? If I eventually go with some adjustable cam gears could that throw off the cam sensor?
Old Aug 4, 2008 | 10:35 AM
  #8  
paul's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,957
Total Cats: 2
From: Point Pleasant, NJ
Default

I believe it's not simply a software setting. I only base that on DIY asking me how I wanted an MSI built recently for an MSM. I opted for the NA CAS setup since I have no experience with the crank pulley trigger.

If you ask me, doing with adjustable cam gears stands more of a chance of screwing up your electrical timing if you are determining timing based on cam position. Typically we determine timing relative to crank position. We just use the cam position to set it because with a fixed cam gear the position of the cam relative to the crank should be identical every time not taking into account timing belt stretching. If you start moving the exhaust cam relative to the crank I would think some compensation would have to be made in electrical timing. If you advance the exhaust cam gear 2 degrees you are advancing the electrical timing too, 4 degrees I think since 2 revolutions of the crank = 1 revolution of the cams.

If you set timing at crank by the actual crank position with crank pulley trigger the electrical timing is locked to the crank position no matter how much you move your adjustable cam gear.

anyone?
Old Aug 4, 2008 | 11:11 PM
  #9  
Joe Perez's Avatar
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 34,402
Total Cats: 7,523
From: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Default

You'll need to build the VR input circuit for the crank sensor (on the '96-'97 cars it truly is a naked VR sensor, rather than an open-collector hall sensor as in the NBs) and you will also need to build a second input circuit and wire up the CMP signal from the CAS (as per a "normal" NA install) to provide an absolute TDC reference.

If you're using an MS2, some fancy software config in MegaTune and you'll be up and running. With the MS1 CPU, you'll need to physically grind off the two teeth which are under the sensor when at TDC and BDC.


And Paul is 100% correct in that the '96-'97 cars use both CAS signals for primary operation, with the crankweel purely for OBD-II misfire detection. Starting in '99, the crankwheel became the primary firing trigger.
Old Aug 5, 2008 | 09:12 AM
  #10  
Big Boy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 110
Total Cats: 0
From: St. Paul MN
Default

Thanks for the helpful response.
Old Aug 5, 2008 | 12:51 PM
  #11  
mtncrvr's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 246
Total Cats: 0
From: NC
Default

I can testify on this one - no crank angle on 99-00 = no run even with the intake sensor.... I'd have to agree with Paul in that it's reversed on the 99/00 cars (top one is for OBD2).
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
spec1sef
MEGAsquirt
28
May 9, 2017 07:03 AM
Asx
MEGAsquirt
5
Dec 15, 2015 11:14 AM
elesjuan
Build Threads
7
Nov 3, 2015 01:51 PM
Elfering
MEGAsquirt
50
Oct 5, 2015 08:04 AM
Dobzeh
ECUs and Tuning
5
Sep 17, 2015 02:56 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:03 AM.