General Miata Chat A place to talk about anything Miata

Roll Bar - HDHC versus HDHC 'Hardtop'

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-07-2008, 10:36 PM
  #1  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (15)
 
ZX-Tex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 4,847
Total Cats: 27
Default Roll Bar - HDHC versus HDHC 'Hardtop'

As established in this thread (thanks Y8S) BOTH the regular M2 Hard Dog Hard Core (HC) and M2 Hard Dog Hard Core Hard Top (HCHT) WILL fit in a NB with a hard top, even with padding, despite what Bethania says.

So I am about to get one of these, and am wondering about differences between the two versions. Here is what I think is going on. Tell me if I am right.

The M2 HC hoop sits slightly farther forward in the car. The M2 HCHT sits farther back.
The M2 HC is slightly taller than the M2 HCHT maybe 1.5"?
The M2 HC covers up the side hard top latches. The M2 HCHT does not.
The front attachment points on both versions attach to the same points on the chassis. I am not sure about this one.
The seat belt retractors might work a little better with the M2 HCHT?

So it seems like the main reason to go with the regular M2 HC is for the additional head clearance. When using a hard top, one can either go without the side latches or get a solution like those shown in the aforementioned thread. Correct? Anything else to add?
ZX-Tex is offline  
Old 09-07-2008, 10:52 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
wildfire0310's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Outside of the Loop-ATL
Posts: 761
Total Cats: 1
Default

You got everything basically.

The main different between the HardTop and HardCore bars is that the HT bar is angled backwards more to allow clearance for the stock side latches as where with a HC bar the bar is angle to run on top of the latches.(to the point I couldn't install the stock latch on without tapping it in with a hammer, lol)

Everything HT bar I have seen bolts to the same places in all four corners.

The other questions I don't have an answer for as I have not compared HT and HC uninstalled to compare height or compared if the seat belts function smoother.
wildfire0310 is offline  
Old 09-07-2008, 10:53 PM
  #3  
Elite Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Saml01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: NYC
Posts: 5,710
Total Cats: 3
Default

Yea, youre onthe money.
Saml01 is offline  
Old 09-07-2008, 11:09 PM
  #4  
Elite Member
iTrader: (21)
 
paul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Point Pleasant, NJ
Posts: 2,957
Total Cats: 2
Default

My M2 HC non-HT version rubs my OEM hardtop. Enough that is has 1/8" depressions and I've wiped plenty of fiberglass dust off the tops of the seats and rollbar.

Mine also does not attach at the upper seat belt tower which allows the seat belts to retract better than any other HD bar I've owned M1HCDD,M1HCHTDD,M1HCHTSD,M1SportDD,M2SportDD
paul is offline  
Old 09-08-2008, 12:02 AM
  #5  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (15)
 
ZX-Tex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 4,847
Total Cats: 27
Default

Originally Posted by paul
My M2 HC non-HT version rubs my OEM hardtop. Enough that is has 1/8" depressions and I've wiped plenty of fiberglass dust off the tops of the seats and rollbar.
OK that right there would steer me towards the HCHT. Judging by your sig though, maybe since you have an M2 in an NA you are having clearance problems because the NA hard top is different (shorter) than the NB hard top?
ZX-Tex is offline  
Old 09-08-2008, 12:06 AM
  #6  
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
KPLAFIN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: VA, Germany, Afghanistan
Posts: 2,945
Total Cats: 3
Default

Originally Posted by ZX-Tex
the NA hard top is different (shorter) than the NB hard top?
WHAT? I was under the impression that there was no difference in the hardtops and that they were all interchangeable....
KPLAFIN is offline  
Old 09-08-2008, 12:14 AM
  #7  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (15)
 
ZX-Tex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 4,847
Total Cats: 27
Default

According to this the NA and NB hardtops are the same. So much for my theory.
http://www.miata.net/garage/hardtop

The difference in fits between Paul and Y8S then could be simple tolerance stacking. There are certainly several potential variables: the hardtop itself, the roll bar, latches, seals, and roll bar mounting.

Last edited by ZX-Tex; 09-08-2008 at 12:31 AM.
ZX-Tex is offline  
Old 09-08-2008, 01:32 AM
  #8  
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
jdmaddox88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 289
Total Cats: -2
Default

I also prefer the positioning of the HT one purely for aesthetics, I like how it sits back a bit further and doesn't sit so high. Actually, one thing I noticed is the HT bar doesn't sit directly above your head, whereas the regular ones do sit alot closer, something you might want to consider just in case you have any accidents that would cause you to jump up in your seat and maybe bang your head. I know with my hard top one it's still higher than my head but just sits behind me a few inches so there's no need to worry about launching the top of my head into the underside.
jdmaddox88 is offline  
Old 09-08-2008, 01:47 AM
  #9  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,493
Total Cats: 4,080
Default

You cannot use the acronym HT for a roll bar. Just doesn't work.
Braineack is offline  
Old 09-08-2008, 10:03 AM
  #10  
Elite Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Saml01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: NYC
Posts: 5,710
Total Cats: 3
Default

One other thing to keep in mind when deciding is your height. If you have a long torso a HD HT may not be suitable as your head might hit it. I know Chad went with a HD nonHT because his head was to close to it.
Saml01 is offline  
Old 09-08-2008, 10:46 AM
  #11  
y8s
2 Props,3 Dildos,& 1 Cat
iTrader: (8)
 
y8s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Fake Virginia
Posts: 19,338
Total Cats: 573
Default

Originally Posted by ZX-Tex
According to this the NA and NB hardtops are the same. So much for my theory.
http://www.miata.net/garage/hardtop

The difference in fits between Paul and Y8S then could be simple tolerance stacking. There are certainly several potential variables: the hardtop itself, the roll bar, latches, seals, and roll bar mounting.
i've got clearance alll around my bar between it and the hard top.

maybe paul drilled his holes wrong

actually it could very well be tolerances. I doubt bethania holds +/- 1/8" on height. That could be enough that if I got a short bar and he got a tall bar there'd be some rubbing or not.
y8s is offline  
Old 09-08-2008, 02:18 PM
  #12  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (15)
 
ZX-Tex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 4,847
Total Cats: 27
Default

Yeah I agree I doubt they hold +/- 0.125".

Time for some engineering geekage. Say that based on my list there are five sources of tolerance stackup. Assuming all five sources are +/- 0.125", and using root-sum-square stacking, then it is reasonable to assume the overall effect could be +/- 0.28". If the errors are assumed to be +/- 0.2", then the overall stackup is +/- 0.45"

I'm leaning towards the M2 HCHT version. Plus there are a couple of big guys I know (over 6 feet) that ride in my car from time to time. With the stiffer springs and shocks the roof clearance alone can be an issue on big bumps. The other day one of them hit his head on the roof (seatbelt on) when I went over a bump on an on-ramp So it seems like the rear tilt would help with that. I am getting padding regardless.

Now all I need to know is when Bethania is doing their next free shipping deal.
ZX-Tex is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bigmackloud
Miata parts for sale/trade
19
01-08-2021 11:24 AM
Quinn
Cars for sale/trade
6
10-23-2016 07:58 AM
Voltwings
Cars for sale/trade
0
09-27-2015 06:40 PM



Quick Reply: Roll Bar - HDHC versus HDHC 'Hardtop'



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:57 AM.