General Miata Chat A place to talk about anything Miata

Turbo BP vs Low Power Engine Swaps

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-20-2018, 12:24 AM
  #21  
Newb
Thread Starter
 
Chr1s7ian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 6
Total Cats: -3
Default

Thank you guys for all the inputs! So I'll just go top to bottom. I don't plan on making 250whp on a K Swap. With a build its possible but I was saying that in any circumstance I dont want to exceed 250whp. I have a '09 STI with 300whp and even though its 1000lbs heavier, 300whp has been enough for me on the track. I completely agree that mechanical empathy and research will prevent failures. If the K Swap is maybe $1-2k more than a reliable turbo build, is it worth not having to deal with the slightly more complex turbo system in a BP? As well as the weight savings. Im not saying a K Swap drops 100lbs but accessories aside the K swap drops 30lbs over the BP and that doesnt even include the turbo kit. It might sound like im being biased to the K Swap but im just trying to make an educated decision with help from you guys before I drop $$$$ on anything.
Chr1s7ian is offline  
Old 03-20-2018, 12:30 AM
  #22  
Newb
Thread Starter
 
Chr1s7ian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 6
Total Cats: -3
Default

Originally Posted by KMiata
Where in the Midwest are you? We can definitely throw you in the right seat of one of our cars on track this year if you want to experience a K24 swap first hand. We'll have a couple cars at the Gridlife festival and a bunch of other local events.

We've dialed in the K swap very well over the last 3 years. The current package is extremely reliable and works well with the factory drivetrain. figure 220whp for a stock k24a2 swap. If you want to see around 250whp, you'll need a k20a2 head, some big cams, and maybe e85. We made 248whp on 93 with a setup like this a couple years ago.

If you have specific questions you can hit me up via email anytime at sales@kmiata.com or call the shop to chat.
Im in the Omaha area. Ive seen you guys are based out of Chicago Metro and have seen your customer support on forums and those have been major factors in my consideration. Do you have any events in the Chicago area in the coming months?
Chr1s7ian is offline  
Old 03-20-2018, 09:12 AM
  #23  
Elite Member
iTrader: (4)
 
psyber_0ptix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 4,648
Total Cats: 544
Default

If i where ever to do it again, I'd K-swap. It's a newer motor, it's stout, it's a high performer with plenty of head room. I'd love to turbo one, but still wondering about speedometer solutions if using a bmw trans.
psyber_0ptix is offline  
Old 03-20-2018, 09:50 AM
  #24  
Elite Member
iTrader: (6)
 
ryansmoneypit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: A cave in Va
Posts: 3,395
Total Cats: 456
Default

Originally Posted by psyber_0ptix
If i where ever to do it again, I'd K-swap. It's a newer motor, it's stout, it's a high performer with plenty of head room. I'd love to turbo one, but still wondering about speedometer solutions if using a bmw trans.
Im in the same boat. To be completely honest, with my 6258 the car can be driven in 6th gear down to about 20 mph. It really took a lot of fun out of drives. It made driving in the twisties a lot different. No downshifting, ever, and its not that exciting until triple digits.. It just isnt laboring at 3k rpm and is still slamming you into the seat. I think a K would be more fun.
ryansmoneypit is offline  
Old 03-20-2018, 10:25 AM
  #25  
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
18psi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,481
Default

two completely different uses you're describing. I agree that being able to beat on a car, explore limits of cornering, drive flat out 10/10 is a whole lot of fun.

Then you drive that same car daily or on flat/straight roads and it's so boring you fall asleep at the wheel.

Meanwhile a fat torquey turbo powerband will keep most below 20% throttle in the twisties because both the car and the driver are simply overpowered, which does get frustrating in the corners from time to time, but feels a-ma-zing daily driving and in "point and shoot" situations and suddenly the situation is backwards.

Why not have both?
18psi is offline  
Old 03-20-2018, 10:36 AM
  #26  
Junior Member
 
tyhackman15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: ATX
Posts: 169
Total Cats: 13
Default

Originally Posted by Chr1s7ian
Thank you guys for all the inputs! So I'll just go top to bottom. I don't plan on making 250whp on a K Swap. With a build its possible but I was saying that in any circumstance I dont want to exceed 250whp. I have a '09 STI with 300whp and even though its 1000lbs heavier, 300whp has been enough for me on the track. I completely agree that mechanical empathy and research will prevent failures. If the K Swap is maybe $1-2k more than a reliable turbo build, is it worth not having to deal with the slightly more complex turbo system in a BP? As well as the weight savings. Im not saying a K Swap drops 100lbs but accessories aside the K swap drops 30lbs over the BP and that doesnt even include the turbo kit. It might sound like im being biased to the K Swap but im just trying to make an educated decision with help from you guys before I drop $$$$ on anything.
I think you are underestimating the cost of a kswap or overestimating a reliable turbo build. You can literally buy the ~$5k FM2 kit, slap on some hood vents and an oil cooler and do all the HPDE's you want without issue. My car has been doing exactly that for about 7 years now. Oil and basic consumables are all it has needed. 220whp 1.8.

Kswap you're looking at about $10k+ realistically. Yes I'd love one, but I'd argue the cost isn't as close as you think for a recreational HPDE build. If we're talking actual racecar then things start to even out as a turbo bp needs a few more things to handle that level of driving.
tyhackman15 is offline  
Old 03-21-2018, 01:39 PM
  #27  
Supporting Vendor
 
KMiata's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 635
Total Cats: 322
Default

Originally Posted by tyhackman15
Kswap you're looking at about $10k+ realistically. Yes I'd love one, but I'd argue the cost isn't as close as you think for a recreational HPDE build. If we're talking actual racecar then things start to even out as a turbo bp needs a few more things to handle that level of driving.
K swaps used to be $10k+, but with the new parts available we've typically been getting people into 220whp k24a2 setups for around $8500. NAs are still a bit more expensive due to the fuel system. Although we don't see it often, you can still do a budget build and make 200whp by using a cheap S2000 intake manifold/throttle body and the stock TSX exhaust manifold.
__________________
KPower Industries
Home of the original KMiata Swap




K24 NC swap is coming in 2024! Learn more

info@kpower.industries
Follow us on Facebook and Instagram







KMiata is offline  
Old 03-22-2018, 07:35 AM
  #28  
Newb
Thread Starter
 
Chr1s7ian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 6
Total Cats: -3
Default

I’m kind of on the side of the K being a newer design and more stout. I’ve also looked online and after radiator, clutch, and e85 system the turbo kit runs around $7.5k. I’ve check the same for the Kswap and online it turns out to be around $8.5k. Both of these figures are with everything included except tune. Anything about the J Swap? By far the least interest but I’d still like to hear
Chr1s7ian is offline  
Reply
Leave a poscat -3 Leave a negcat
Old 03-22-2018, 09:58 AM
  #29  
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
18psi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,481
Default

Yeah. It sucks
18psi is offline  
Old 03-22-2018, 03:59 PM
  #30  
Elite Member
iTrader: (4)
 
psyber_0ptix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 4,648
Total Cats: 544
Default

Start doing some searches. The number of hits you find may give you enough information.
psyber_0ptix is offline  
Old 03-22-2018, 04:19 PM
  #31  
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
concealer404's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,917
Total Cats: 2,201
Default

You like your engine on the end of a big lever, right?
concealer404 is offline  
Old 03-22-2018, 04:26 PM
  #32  
Elite Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Midtenn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Murfreesboro,TN
Posts: 2,045
Total Cats: 265
Default

I know Justin @ Thing 3 Racing (https://www.thing3racing.com/) runs a J32 in his AER/WRL Endurocar. User name slammed200.

Last edited by Midtenn; 03-22-2018 at 04:31 PM. Reason: Found the user name
Midtenn is offline  
Old 03-23-2018, 09:31 AM
  #33  
Elite Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Efini~FC3S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 3,310
Total Cats: 98
Default

Calling Justin Lee to the J-swapped Miata courtesy phone...

@slammed200


If anyone knows a thing or two about the J-swap, I'm guessing it's Justin. He's the only one I know of seriously racing and pushing a j-Miata to the limit.

Last edited by Efini~FC3S; 03-23-2018 at 09:32 AM. Reason: phone type Os
Efini~FC3S is offline  
Old 03-23-2018, 10:00 AM
  #34  
Junior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
slammed200's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 485
Total Cats: 29
Default

Originally Posted by Chr1s7ian
So hey guys I’ve had my Miata for almost 8 months now. I’ve been steadily learning how to push it to the limits while simultaneously increasing performance as well as safety mods. I plan on starting to track my car very consistently (I know the related costs).

Reliability and seat time are my main concerns.

Chiming in here from an endurance race team owner's perspective, reliability and seat time are huge. I also hesitate to recommend that ANYONE add a single horsepower when learning how to drive on track. Honestly, and this is always the last thing anyone wants to hear, power doesn't help you become a better driver. I'll get off my pedal-stool now since that's not what you asked but...

Now - about the J swap. I've had to completely redo just about every aspect of the J swap components to make it suitable for endurance racing and to my knowledge I'm the only one racing it regularly in these types of events. It's a hell of a car to drive now after all of that, smooth torques for days on days, but getting here wasn't easy at all. I'm not going to comment on the other options listed other than to say simple is sweet but you can swing that tradeoff based on your goals. Reliability and seat time are my main concerns.
slammed200 is offline  
Old 03-23-2018, 01:51 PM
  #35  
Senior Member
 
Schroedinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 790
Total Cats: 188
Default

^ good advice here.

You didn’t say much about your track goals in the OP, or if you’ve even been on the track at all yet. If your plan is just to do HPDE/track days and you’re not trying to shave seconds off of lap times, just get out there and do it in a stock car. Trust me the car won’t be holding you back.

I’m going down this path right now with a turbo 1.6L, making 170-180 hp. No reliability issues at all so far, and the car is plenty fast/fun. I have absolutely no need or use for more power in the foreseeable future.

Building a car for fun on the track is a totally different set of priorities than building a car for lap times or racing. I don’t think you can have more fun than throwing a stock Miata on street tires around a track.
Schroedinger is offline  
Old 03-23-2018, 04:12 PM
  #36  
Junior Member
 
MrJon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 106
Total Cats: 24
Default

There is also the ecotec swap that seems like a decent option. A little less desirable than a k series, but also it's a cheaper swap.
MrJon is offline  
Old 03-23-2018, 04:31 PM
  #37  
Moderator
iTrader: (12)
 
sixshooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 20,660
Total Cats: 3,011
Default

There's a really neat manifold swap that I'm a big fan of. It generates really good power. I'm pretty sure it allows you to run a turbo on your existing engine.
sixshooter is offline  
Old 03-23-2018, 04:55 PM
  #38  
Elite Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Midtenn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Murfreesboro,TN
Posts: 2,045
Total Cats: 265
Default

Originally Posted by sixshooter
There's a really neat manifold swap that I'm a big fan of. It generates really good power. I'm pretty sure it allows you to run a turbo on your existing engine.
Sort of like a turbo manifold?
Midtenn is offline  
Old 03-23-2018, 05:13 PM
  #39  
Elite Member
iTrader: (4)
 
hornetball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Granbury, TX
Posts: 6,301
Total Cats: 696
Default

Originally Posted by 18psi
two completely different uses you're describing. I agree that being able to beat on a car, explore limits of cornering, drive flat out 10/10 is a whole lot of fun.

Then you drive that same car daily or on flat/straight roads and it's so boring you fall asleep at the wheel.

Meanwhile a fat torquey turbo powerband will keep most below 20% throttle in the twisties because both the car and the driver are simply overpowered, which does get frustrating in the corners from time to time, but feels a-ma-zing daily driving and in "point and shoot" situations and suddenly the situation is backwards.

Why not have both?
Have to agree. I daily the turbo. It's a hoot to squirt around and break the tires free at will.

For the most part, I track a 949 95R project clone. Pretty much SuperMiata S2 specification. Fantastic track car that never misses a beat.

Sometimes I'll borrow my daughter's '15 PRHT GT with all the bells and whistles for date night.

You can never have enough Miatas. Are the '19s out yet?
hornetball is offline  
Old 03-23-2018, 05:38 PM
  #40  
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
ridethecliche's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: New Fucking Jersey
Posts: 3,890
Total Cats: 143
Default

Originally Posted by Savington
Not to toot my own horn, but if you built a reliable turbo car before 2015, you did it with an engineering degree or an extreme amount of persistence. It was certainly doable, but it was not formulaic like it has become in the last ~2yrs or so. The fact that you can buy off-the-shelf components from Trackspeed and build a reliable turbo car in your garage is a relatively new thing.
Hasn't flying miata been doing this since the mid 90's? Obviously TSE has refined and taken things to the next level with the EFR turbos, but I was under the impression that the full FM kits did this pretty handily.
ridethecliche is offline  
Reply
Leave a poscat -1 Leave a negcat


Quick Reply: Turbo BP vs Low Power Engine Swaps



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:13 AM.