Notices
General Miata Chat A place to talk about anything Miata

What is the purpose of the intake manifold brace?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 16, 2009 | 11:45 AM
  #21  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

lol at weight savings.
Old Apr 16, 2009 | 11:47 AM
  #22  
Turbo_4's Avatar
I EAT CUM
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,198
Total Cats: 0
From: Redneck, Texas
Default

Honestly, I thought I remembering reading that the piece had something to do with helping with vibrations and what not...definetly nothing to do with the tb.
Old Apr 16, 2009 | 11:49 AM
  #23  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

I'm willing to bet the rigidity of the IM stays the same with or without the brace.

never heard of any failure directly related to it, and im sure more than 50% of the m.net members have their brace removed.
Old Apr 16, 2009 | 11:58 AM
  #24  
Saml01's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,710
Total Cats: 3
From: NYC
Default

Originally Posted by Braineack
I'm willing to bet the rigidity of the IM stays the same with or without the brace.

never heard of any failure directly related to it, and im sure more than 50% of the m.net members have their brace removed.
I agree.

In order to help any with rigidity it needs to have tension on it, which it does not.
Old Apr 16, 2009 | 12:31 PM
  #25  
y8s's Avatar
y8s
DEI liberal femininity
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 19,338
Total Cats: 574
From: Fake Virginia
Default

anyone measured the amount the intake manifold moves relative to the block at all RPM conditions? because it probably does a little. And aluminum SUCKS at fatigue resistance. just a mm or two of shake will break stuff fast.
Old Apr 16, 2009 | 01:07 PM
  #26  
1slowna's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 328
Total Cats: 4
From: Palm Harbor FL
Default

the dsms have a very similar brace which i removed from my car with no issues at all, however my buddy removed it and his manifold literally fell off during a hard launch.
i think the only difference was that he had his coils mounted to the manifold like they are stock and i had cops. maybe the extra weight on it did it? it left the flange on the head and was hanging from throttle cable and plug wires.
Old Apr 16, 2009 | 01:26 PM
  #27  
wayne_curr's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,712
Total Cats: 5
From: Bellingham, Wa
Default

Removed the damn thing from our integra as well when I redid the head. No issues there either.
Old Apr 16, 2009 | 01:46 PM
  #28  
Savington's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,106
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Default

Originally Posted by Braineack
I'm willing to bet the rigidity of the IM stays the same with or without the brace.

never heard of any failure directly related to it, and im sure more than 50% of the m.net members have their brace removed.
And 99% of m.net members don't drive their cars hard enough for it to matter. 99% of the members here, too, for that matter. If you routinely rev your motor past 7000rpm, I'd have that thing in. I don't, but only because it doesn't fit.
Old Apr 16, 2009 | 02:13 PM
  #29  
Saml01's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,710
Total Cats: 3
From: NYC
Default

Originally Posted by 1slowna
the dsms have a very similar brace which i removed from my car with no issues at all, however my buddy removed it and his manifold literally fell off during a hard launch.
I think the only difference was that he had his coils mounted to the manifold like they are stock and i had cops. Maybe the extra weight on it did it? It left the flange on the head and was hanging from throttle cable and plug wires.
DaNgEr To MaNiFoLd!!!!!!!!!!!
Old Apr 16, 2009 | 04:33 PM
  #30  
hindle's Avatar
Newb
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 35
Total Cats: 0
From: Readington, NJ
Default

I removed it on all 3 of my DSMs the first time I ever had to do anything underneath it. Never looked back.
Old Apr 16, 2009 | 11:53 PM
  #31  
crashnscar's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 929
Total Cats: 9
From: Bay Area, California
Default

K. If you drive your **** hard, leave it in.

So everyone here, go ahead and take it out.

And how do you not see a correlation between the intake manifold brace and those bolts backing out? Leave the engineering to the engineers, not your puny little brain.
Old Apr 17, 2009 | 12:16 AM
  #32  
RotorNutFD3S's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,522
Total Cats: 36
From: Newnan, GA
Default

After just watching a video of Savington on the track, and him saying he doesn't have it installed, really leads me to believe that it's going to be just fine without it.
Old Apr 17, 2009 | 12:32 AM
  #33  
kotomile's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 7,537
Total Cats: 42
From: Monterey, CA
Default

Originally Posted by crashnscar
K. If you drive your **** hard, leave it in.

So everyone here, go ahead and take it out.

And how do you not see a correlation between the intake manifold brace and those bolts backing out? Leave the engineering to the engineers, not your puny little brain.
I suppose there could be a resonance, hadn't thought of that. Is the theory that Emilio's TB screw backed out due to the sustained vibration?

BTW - Like I told Sav, I'm not an engineer, or an engineering student, or anything like an engineer. I don't think that makes my brain "puny", kthx.
Old Apr 17, 2009 | 01:24 AM
  #34  
Savington's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,106
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Default

Originally Posted by RotorNutFD3S
After just watching a video of Savington on the track, and him saying he doesn't have it installed, really leads me to believe that it's going to be just fine without it.
I want it in, though. I tried to leave it in but I need to redo my oil cooler lines to make it fit. If you have room for it, it should be installed.
Old Apr 17, 2009 | 01:35 AM
  #35  
RotorNutFD3S's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,522
Total Cats: 36
From: Newnan, GA
Default

Originally Posted by Savington
I want it in, though. I tried to leave it in but I need to redo my oil cooler lines to make it fit. If you have room for it, it should be installed.
Ah. Sorry to have misinterpreted your statement then. I won't say that my motor routinely sees 7000+ RPM, but it's seen it on a few occasions. Guess I'll reconsider reinstalling it.
Old Apr 17, 2009 | 08:33 AM
  #36  
Doppelgänger's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 6,850
Total Cats: 71
From: Charlotte, NC
Default

Oil filter relocation...problem solved.
Old Apr 17, 2009 | 10:08 AM
  #37  
Saml01's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,710
Total Cats: 3
From: NYC
Default

Originally Posted by RotorNutFD3S
After just watching a video of Savington on the track, and him saying he doesn't have it installed, really leads me to believe that it's going to be just fine without it.
Savington needs to concentrate more on his brakes then intake manifold braces.
Old Apr 17, 2009 | 11:32 AM
  #38  
y8s's Avatar
y8s
DEI liberal femininity
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 19,338
Total Cats: 574
From: Fake Virginia
Default

mine doesn't fit because of the intake manifold spacer gasket. I need to put one on the bottom of the bracket to space it out accordingly.
Old Apr 17, 2009 | 12:10 PM
  #39  
bhoss's Avatar
Newb
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 9
Total Cats: 0
Default

Be careful with the intake manifold spacer and no brace. I ran this way on my NA track car. After a lot of abuse on track, three of the intake manifold studs broke, the intake started to suck in air and burned out the #4 piston.

I am now running with the stock intake gasket and the brace. The engine really moves around a lot at 7,000 rpm.
Old Apr 17, 2009 | 12:13 PM
  #40  
crashnscar's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 929
Total Cats: 9
From: Bay Area, California
Default

Originally Posted by kotomile
I suppose there could be a resonance, hadn't thought of that. Is the theory that Emilio's TB screw backed out due to the sustained vibration?

BTW - Like I told Sav, I'm not an engineer, or an engineering student, or anything like an engineer. I don't think that makes my brain "puny", kthx.
Talking about Saml01, and Philly, and Turbo_4. In response to your first post, we can't be sure, but it makes sense and there is a reason they increased vehicle production costs so that they could have it when designing the motor.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:03 PM.