The AI-generated cat pictures thread
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,046
Total Cats: 6,607
If the owner of the car has comprehensive coverage (which is optional), then insurance will most likely pay out. If they do not, then they can try to file a civil lawsuit against the police department, however they will most likely lose, as the police were not responsible for the event which instigated the pursuit, which was the theft itself. A suit filed against the thief would be pointless, as the average car thief does not have sufficient financial resources to pay against a judgement.
Disclaimer: my area of interest was IP and corporate law, not this messy civil stuff.
Collision. Comprehensive is for theft, vandalism, stuff like that. If the car is moving and hits something, or is hit by something else on wheels, then it's collision.
--Ian
Edit: I had assumed the question applied to a bystander car that was hit by the perp after the police spun him, but apparently not.
Assuming the car belonged to the perp, it probably isn't covered at all, because most policies don't cover damage incurred if you're operating the vehicle while committing a crime (and running from the cops is a crime.) If stolen then yeah, police aren't responsible for damage to the car incurred while stopping it, but normal policy should apply. I don't know if that would be collision or comprehensive though.
--Ian
Edit: I had assumed the question applied to a bystander car that was hit by the perp after the police spun him, but apparently not.
Assuming the car belonged to the perp, it probably isn't covered at all, because most policies don't cover damage incurred if you're operating the vehicle while committing a crime (and running from the cops is a crime.) If stolen then yeah, police aren't responsible for damage to the car incurred while stopping it, but normal policy should apply. I don't know if that would be collision or comprehensive though.
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,046
Total Cats: 6,607
Collision. Comprehensive is for theft, vandalism, stuff like that. If the car is moving and hits something, or is hit by something else on wheels, then it's collision.
--Ian
Edit: I had assumed the question applied to a bystander car that was hit by the perp after the police spun him, but apparently not.
Assuming the car belonged to the perp, it probably isn't covered at all, because most policies don't cover damage incurred if you're operating the vehicle while committing a crime (and running from the cops is a crime.) If stolen then yeah, police aren't responsible for damage to the car incurred while stopping it, but normal policy should apply. I don't know if that would be collision or comprehensive though.
--Ian
Edit: I had assumed the question applied to a bystander car that was hit by the perp after the police spun him, but apparently not.
Assuming the car belonged to the perp, it probably isn't covered at all, because most policies don't cover damage incurred if you're operating the vehicle while committing a crime (and running from the cops is a crime.) If stolen then yeah, police aren't responsible for damage to the car incurred while stopping it, but normal policy should apply. I don't know if that would be collision or comprehensive though.
Presupposing that the owner was not driving the car at the time (which is a reasonable assumption, as it was described as "stolen"), then this falls under comprehensive coverage, as a theft was the instigating event.
I don't recall seeing any third-party private vehicles being damaged during the pursuit. But if there were, then the insurance requirement would vary between collision (if the 3rd party car was being operated by the insured at the time) and comprehensive (if it was parked and un-occupied.)
Either way, a lot of motorists in the US carry only the state-mandated liability insurance, meaning that they'd have no recourse with insurance regardless of whether they owned the car which was stolen or suffered damage to their cars during the pursuit. In such an event, their recourse would be to serve the police deportment with notice that they intend to file a civil suit if they are not compensated for damages, then file said suit, and then lose (and have to pay attorneys fees and court costs.)
TL;DR: If you live in the USA, try not to be in the wrong place at the wrong time.
I don't recall seeing any third-party private vehicles being damaged during the pursuit. But if there were, then the insurance requirement would vary between collision (if the 3rd party car was being operated by the insured at the time) and comprehensive (if it was parked and un-occupied.)
Either way, a lot of motorists in the US carry only the state-mandated liability insurance, meaning that they'd have no recourse with insurance regardless of whether they owned the car which was stolen or suffered damage to their cars during the pursuit. In such an event, their recourse would be to serve the police deportment with notice that they intend to file a civil suit if they are not compensated for damages, then file said suit, and then lose (and have to pay attorneys fees and court costs.)
My parked, unoccupied Audi that was hit by the 16-year-old daughter of a friend of my wife's (in reverse). I filed under my policy because it was simpler than trying to deal with her carrier (USAA) directly. Despite the parked, unoccupied, and in-reverse aspects (which were not in disupute), it took USAA 2 years to agree to pay for it under subrogation, and thus for me to get my deductible back.
--Ian
Fergie should be ashamed... that shiz was aweful... but she's gonna have to dig a lot deeper to do worse than Jamie Foxx at the Pacquiao/Mayweather fight. Any respect I may have had for professional boxing went out the window after that... forget the ******* fight, hearing that **** totally ruined it for a long time.
I know everybody says Whitney at the '91 Super Bowl is the best ever... kinda tied with a dozen other great ones. I was about 15 rows up in Turn 1 for this one... tough to beat.
I know everybody says Whitney at the '91 Super Bowl is the best ever... kinda tied with a dozen other great ones. I was about 15 rows up in Turn 1 for this one... tough to beat.
Pink did a good job at the SuperBowl too (she's considered an honorary Australian since she's toured here a lot, always adding extra concerts, always filling stadiums and no-one here ever seems to have a bad word to say about her).
Most national anthems are crap IMO and have to be suffered rather than adding anything enjoyable to the experience.
Rugby pre-game activities that have one or two Polynesian teams always have a Haka which is entertaining and some of the Polynesian national anthems are pretty good too, like this Fijian one sung by the players at the 2017 Rugby League World Cup:
.
Australia's national anthem, "Advance Australia Fair", other than the first verse, is barely known by anyone in Australia and we much prefer our unofficial anthem, "Waltzing Matilda",
There's some stirring footage I saw on the History Channel of WWI Australian soldiers marching into battle behind the creeping barrage all whistling "Waltzing Matilda" which I can't find anywhere.
Here's some footage from WWII of Australian soldiers singing it on a march (yes, it's been dubbed) - sounds MUCH better than "Advance Australia Fair"!
At the 3:00 mark they switch to whistling the tune.
It's a song about a vagrant who stole and butchered a sheep to eat, then drowned in a water hole avoiding captured by the authorities - if that doesn't personify Aussies I don't know what does!
When sung in unison within a stadium, "Waltzing Matilda" sounds great.
Moderator
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 20,663
Total Cats: 3,012