The AI-generated cat pictures thread
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 5,155
Total Cats: 406
FF is faster for not a lot more money. I guess a Vee might be better for autox? I know a lot of guys autox these FFs too, but I want to do vintage or CF racing - I mean that's the point of having a race car right? To race it.
The tires, brakes, and other consumables are cheaper than SM over a season, and motor rebuilds don't need to occur every season either (maybe every 2 years tops), and it gives you a chance to really setup a real car by playing with transmission ratios and suspension setups. I'm a real nerd for that sort of thing.
The tires, brakes, and other consumables are cheaper than SM over a season, and motor rebuilds don't need to occur every season either (maybe every 2 years tops), and it gives you a chance to really setup a real car by playing with transmission ratios and suspension setups. I'm a real nerd for that sort of thing.
I raced Formula Vee for a while, and it was certainly a lot of fun even with a lousy ~50hp. I did some vintage racing in the HSR as well. Its a simple matter of swapping out the zero roll rear suspension for 2 normal shocks and putting the fan back on. It was fun too, but cheating was even more rampant than in the SCCA.
Ive been out of the game for a while now, but the FFs using Honda Fit engines now sounds really cool to me. I bet theyre bulletproof as ****.
If I was going to get into anything budget-ish and open wheel it would be the new 600 sport bike motors in F500 chassis class that is doing regional trials now. One of the local guys is spearheading them, and they're pretty fabbbb.
Yeah, odds are that if/when I get an FF I'd install a crate L15A motor at some point (probably around the time I'd need the first rebuild on the Ford 1.6. The SCCA will even let them run in the CF/vintage classes - you just need a massive restrictor. Doesn't stop the car from being competitive though, L15A powered FF cars have won a bunch of races.
Not sure if they let you install any more sophisticated engine management (read MS), but that would be nice to have as well.
Those Super Vee cars look a lot better than the regular FV cars, with aero and whatnot, suspension looks pretty similar. The FF motors are dry sumped though, which is pretty nifty. They look like they use hewland gears and chassis designs are pretty similar.
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,039
Total Cats: 6,604
When I hear things like "dry sump" and "hewland gears", affordability is not the first thing that comes to mind. Though admittedly, I've never priced out a FF car.
Formula Vee cars, by comparison, are laughably inexpensive. Older ones sometimes go for $5k or less, including trailer.
For what they are (really old cars running horribly primitive suspension and poorly-designed 50hp engines), they're also surprisingly quick. We usually get 3 or 4 FV cars on a typical autocross day down ay Qualcomm in San Diego. They run in F-mod, and typically produce laptimes which are identical to the SSM Miatas and S2Ks.
Formula Vee cars, by comparison, are laughably inexpensive. Older ones sometimes go for $5k or less, including trailer.
For what they are (really old cars running horribly primitive suspension and poorly-designed 50hp engines), they're also surprisingly quick. We usually get 3 or 4 FV cars on a typical autocross day down ay Qualcomm in San Diego. They run in F-mod, and typically produce laptimes which are identical to the SSM Miatas and S2Ks.
FV is the cheapest way to go fast, besides a kart. Like everything its being competitive thats expensive. But a 5-10k FV will run faster lap times than the stripped out racing cars on alot of circuits.... if your goal is to 'race yourself' and have fun AND go fast, its a win. Can tow behind cars too they are so light...
My uncle was competitive in the midwest region for Formula Ford 2000 (same stuff as FF, but with a 2.0l engine instead of the 1.6l). Always wished we'd live close enough for me to hang out with him (not that he'd necessarily want a kid hanging around his shop all the time). He was my fun uncle. The summer I turned 16, he took me for a drive in his C4, pulled over halfway through the drive, told me to get behind the wheel, and then when traffic cleared he told me to punch it.
Good memories.
Good memories.
Again, I'd never take an FV to a race track. I want something open wheeled and cheap that I feel comfortable with using on track. I just can't stomach buying something like that purely as an autox toy.
The 1.6 FFs I've been pricing out are all around the $15k range give or take, which is $10k less than the Elise's I've been looking at
The 1.6 FFs I've been pricing out are all around the $15k range give or take, which is $10k less than the Elise's I've been looking at
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,039
Total Cats: 6,604
Or you're concerned that the FV is just too slow to keep pace on a high-speed track?
I think the FF is more more structurely sound in a roll over situation than the FV would be. I think overall it is a safer and faster package, so its a win/win. Plus (I may be wrong here), but the FF suspension geometry is a bit more modern, and its an overall better platform (IMHO).
If I have a budget for an Elise, and I'm 10k under that for an FF car, its pretty well within my budget, so saving a few more grand isn't really an issue when comparing FV to FF - I can compare them just based on performance and stuff.
Super Vee looks pretty sweet, but I think FF is more popular, resulting in more competition which is always fun.
And an F600 would probably suck on an autocross course. You wouldn't be able to make any use of it. I see no reason why an F500/F600 would be any less big-track-capable than a 100hp Club Ford.
Bob
The only place I've seen F500/F600 cars is at an autox. I don't think its big track capable because a lot of normal sized Americans (I'm not one of them at 5'9" and 140lbs) will have their shoulders sticking out of the car. I've seen a lot of open wheeled cars at big tracks, never a single F500/600 car.
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,039
Total Cats: 6,604
Over the years, at least a dozen different companies (probably many more) have produces chassis and bodies for FV- you can tell just by looking at pictures of them that the chassis design varies radically from one manufacturer to another, even for cars built during the same era. Some builders were known for producing extremely well-engineered (and costly) vehicles, while others preferred to focus on very low-cost chassis, eschewing fancy hardware and not employing the services of a mechanical engineer to do the actual frame design.
Since FF was never a sole-source class with regard to chassis, I have to imagine that the same variability exists here.
And yet, despite all logic and reason, they actually seem to work pretty well.
Since FF was never a sole-source class with regard to chassis, I have to imagine that the same variability exists here.
Haha. "A bit more modern" is being extremely kind. The suspension design on the FV is so antiquated that it's amazing they don't roll over by themselves in a light breeze. The front suspension is a transverse-beam, twisted-leaf configuration, and the rear is a center-pivot swingaxle (camber changes from negative to positive as the suspension extends.) It's all straight out of the original 1938 VW Beetle.
And yet, despite all logic and reason, they actually seem to work pretty well.
So yeah, I want more modern suspension. I'm not even sure what twisted leaf actually is, so I'm pretty sure I don't want it
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 5,155
Total Cats: 406
Im pretty good freidns with a guy who builds FVs
Caracal Cars.com - Home of Clark Racing and Caracal Cars
Joe is right, the suspension is ancient, but its also strong, simple, and cheap to replace. Ive seen spectacular FV crashes that resulted in nothing more than having to replace some fiberglass and a getting a "new" front axle from the junkyard for $20.
The sport is so old that people know exactly how to squeeze every bit of everything out that that suspension. Ive only seen one shock dyno, and it was in Fred's shop (Caracal cars).
My old Vee was sexy as ****. It was like a big square dick with ***** of rage:
I was one of the guys out there running on no budget. I bought rusty parts from the VW junkyard, cleaned them up, modified them, and painted them. I built countless junkyard engines, that I worked over and was able to be competitive with the guys who were buying Noble crate engines for 5 grand.
Caracal Cars.com - Home of Clark Racing and Caracal Cars
Joe is right, the suspension is ancient, but its also strong, simple, and cheap to replace. Ive seen spectacular FV crashes that resulted in nothing more than having to replace some fiberglass and a getting a "new" front axle from the junkyard for $20.
The sport is so old that people know exactly how to squeeze every bit of everything out that that suspension. Ive only seen one shock dyno, and it was in Fred's shop (Caracal cars).
My old Vee was sexy as ****. It was like a big square dick with ***** of rage:
I was one of the guys out there running on no budget. I bought rusty parts from the VW junkyard, cleaned them up, modified them, and painted them. I built countless junkyard engines, that I worked over and was able to be competitive with the guys who were buying Noble crate engines for 5 grand.
Wow that is sweet! So you were running these little things on the big tracks?
I wonder what the cost difference if you did 4-5 races a year would be. Both motors shouldn't need to be rebuilt that often. For me doing 4-5 races a year on a real shoe-string budget, it would only really work for me to replace/rebuild the motor every 3-4 years. FF motors are obviously more expensive than a crap old air cooled VW motor, so that's a big plus for the FV. I'm kind of curious what the laptime around Sebring would be though. 3:30+?
The rebuild issue is why I'd consider putting a more reliable L15A in instead of another Kent motor.
I wonder what the cost difference if you did 4-5 races a year would be. Both motors shouldn't need to be rebuilt that often. For me doing 4-5 races a year on a real shoe-string budget, it would only really work for me to replace/rebuild the motor every 3-4 years. FF motors are obviously more expensive than a crap old air cooled VW motor, so that's a big plus for the FV. I'm kind of curious what the laptime around Sebring would be though. 3:30+?
The rebuild issue is why I'd consider putting a more reliable L15A in instead of another Kent motor.