Notices
Insert BS here A place to discuss anything you want

Holy Toyota!

Old May 18, 2010 | 09:22 AM
  #1  
inferno94's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 521
Total Cats: 2
From: ON
Default Holy Toyota!

I didn't realize such little boost (claimed 11psi) could make so much power. "it could use 900's" injectors?!

High powered scion

Maybe it's just me not knowing much about Toyota motors but that seems like alot. Truthfully idk what size motors a TC has but I'd think a 1.8 maybe a 2.4 which I could see making these #'s.
Old May 18, 2010 | 09:36 AM
  #2  
neogenesis2004's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,413
Total Cats: 20
Default

My TC, all TC's, have a 2.4L 4cyl.
Old May 18, 2010 | 10:08 AM
  #3  
ArtieParty's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,118
Total Cats: 0
From: Trenton, NJ
Default

Originally Posted by inferno94
I didn't realize such little boost (claimed 11psi) could make so much power. .
You do realize that boost (in psi) is different for every turbo right? 11psi on a 2554 is not the same as 11psi on a 3071. This guy never says in the thread what turbo he's running. But what he does say is that he's had head work done and he's using meth. I don't see why these numbers wouldn't be possible at all on a 2.4l.
Old May 18, 2010 | 10:08 AM
  #4  
saint_foo's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 442
Total Cats: 0
From: Ashburn, VA
Default

I thought he was running a lot more boost, like 19lbs from the first post (2nd paragraph, 3rd sentence). He was asked on page 3 if the boost levels were the same, he said yes.

Plus, wasn't he running meth with the tune?

Still quite impressive. I was talking to one of my Subaru buddies and they had a WRX (2.5 liter) on the dyno yesterday at TurboXS. Put down 500whp (Dynopack dyno) at ~23lbs of boost, IIRC. So, similar displacement (2.4 liter vs 2.5), but the Subaru's motor is slightly built. However, the charge has a longer distance to travel thanks to the layout of the exhaust and turbo location....
Old May 18, 2010 | 10:17 AM
  #5  
turotufas's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 3,304
Total Cats: 7
From: Gainesville,Fl
Default

TC motors must be badass. That's a high number compared to other 2.4 Liters. I know 240's can go to about 300 at 11 psi.
Old May 18, 2010 | 10:18 AM
  #6  
neogenesis2004's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,413
Total Cats: 20
Default

You have to consider that the engine tech is much newer than the 240 too.
Old May 18, 2010 | 10:20 AM
  #7  
Full_Tilt_Boogie's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 5,155
Total Cats: 409
From: Jacksonville, FL
Default

Not impressed.
Old May 18, 2010 | 10:21 AM
  #8  
Bryce's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,759
Total Cats: 35
From: Cypress, TX
Default

This talk of X power at Y boost without mentioning the size of the turbo needs to stop.

I have a Civic friend who made 300whp at 6psi on a 1.6. But that was with an SC61.
Old May 18, 2010 | 10:22 AM
  #9  
Full_Tilt_Boogie's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 5,155
Total Cats: 409
From: Jacksonville, FL
Default

Honda B16 (1.6 L) on 19 psi
b16s.jpg?t=1274192490
Old May 18, 2010 | 10:23 AM
  #10  
turotufas's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 3,304
Total Cats: 7
From: Gainesville,Fl
Default

Originally Posted by neogenesis2004
You have to consider that the engine tech is much newer than the 240 too.
Yes and power loss over time.
Old May 18, 2010 | 10:29 AM
  #11  
Full_Tilt_Boogie's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 5,155
Total Cats: 409
From: Jacksonville, FL
Default

Anybody ever driven a tC? They are heavy and slow, and the engine is a souless **** stain of an engine.
Its not a good engine, its a low reving, low performance, economy engine.
Making 400hp on 18 psi with with what is likely a very large turbo is not impressive at all for a 2.4L engine.
Old May 18, 2010 | 11:11 AM
  #12  
ZZZYZZZ's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 100
Total Cats: 0
From: Michigan
Default

417whp on FWD? That must be interesting.
Old May 18, 2010 | 11:22 AM
  #13  
saint_foo's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 442
Total Cats: 0
From: Ashburn, VA
Default

Originally Posted by ZZZYZZZ
417whp on FWD? That must be interesting.
It's still no SRT-4

The SRT-4, driven properly, can actual travel back in time. It can cause a tear in the space-time-continuum.

It's that fast.
Old May 18, 2010 | 11:47 AM
  #14  
Faeflora's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 8,682
Total Cats: 130
From: Los Angeles, CA
Default

Well if it can do that on a stock engine than it is pretty damn badass. Even if it is booaring our engines aint that great without the power to weight. Wow i'm a rapper
Old May 18, 2010 | 12:00 PM
  #15  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

1.6L miata makes 90rwhp. Add 10psi, assuming 10hp per psi = 100 more hp. Then 1.6L now makes 190hp.

2.4L makes 160hp. add 10psi, assuming assuming 10hp per psi = 100 more hp. Then 2.4L now makes 260hp.


cool huh?
Old May 18, 2010 | 01:10 PM
  #16  
Sparetire's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,642
Total Cats: 36
From: Colorado
Default

The idea of a big lazy turbo that makes tons of power with a low pressure ratio seems to come up periodically in any car community. For awhile you saw a decent number of guys in various apps going to low AR T4 setups (like .54 with a pretty mild wheel) and then just running less boost than they would with a T3. The low IATs/backpressures are tempting and the psychology is similar to the idea of a built engine: If I have this thing capable of 8 bajillion HP and I only make 350, then I am bullet-proof. And a T4 setup right will actually spool fairly well in relation to say a 35R. Honda guys do this type of thing all the time because they have a pretty high ceiling to work with and are often on pretty ghetto setups that really need to be protected from detonation. A big lazy cool turbo will make the power "safer" at the expense of some response that lots of guys dont really give a crap about anyway. Lag is meaningless in a straight line race as long as you can drive even sorta well.
Old May 18, 2010 | 01:28 PM
  #17  
neogenesis2004's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,413
Total Cats: 20
Default

The thing is, a big lazy turbo on a 1.6L miata isn't so lazy on a 2.4L TC.

That said, were I to turbo my TC I would just want a smaller turbo, like a Evo8 16G or something. Like the one I sold Splitime. Something to provide instant on demand power.
Old May 18, 2010 | 01:42 PM
  #18  
FRT_Fun's Avatar
I'm a terrible person
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 7,174
Total Cats: 180
From: Arizona
Default

Originally Posted by neogenesis2004
The thing is, a big lazy turbo on a 1.6L miata isn't so lazy on a 2.4L TC.

That said, were I to turbo my TC I would just want a smaller turbo, like a Evo8 16G or something. Like the one I sold Splitime. Something to provide instant on demand power.
But no matter what there is still going to be a small amount of lag, and don't even get me started on boost threshold. Waste of time IMO. What happens when you miss a shift and go to 5th instead of 3rd?!?!? You need that power at 1200rpm that's what. heheh.


If I was going to turbo a 2.4L it would be a Nissan Stanza. /thread.
Old May 18, 2010 | 01:47 PM
  #19  
neogenesis2004's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,413
Total Cats: 20
Default

You are a bag of dicks /thread
Old May 18, 2010 | 01:58 PM
  #20  
y8s's Avatar
y8s
DEI liberal femininity
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 19,338
Total Cats: 574
From: Fake Virginia
Default

GT2876 would work great on a scion *cough*

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:07 AM.